MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Recessed Building Entry Ceiling 2-Hr in Type III-B?

5/21/2025

3 Comments

 
We have a building that's Type III-B construction.

Does a recessed building entry's ceiling need to also be 2-hour fire resistance rated, and non-combustible?

Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Use 2-Hour Gyp. Chase for Standpipe Protection?

3/28/2025

11 Comments

 
Section 9.2.2 in NFPA 14 allows protection for a standpipe that is not in a stairway to be "the piping is enclosed in fire-rated construction with a rating equal to that of the enclosed fire-rated exit stairway."

In the Gypsum Association Manual WP 3910 for a chase wall with staggered studs has a rating of 2 hours.

Does such a 2-hour rated chase meet the intent of NFPA 14 when the standpipe is not in the stair?

Thank you for your feedback!


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Picture
11 Comments

Can "Refuge Area" Include Area Open to Outside?

3/27/2025

3 Comments

 
We're looking at "refuge areas" per 2024 IBC (not to be confused with "areas of refuge" in NFPA 101) within smoke compartments to satisfy the requirements for smoke barriers in Group I-1, Condition 2 in the IBC.

Can the "refuge area" be calculated to include portions of the floor/smoke compartment that are open to the exterior of the building?

For example, an occupant load of 80 persons receiving care on the fifth floor of a Group I-1, Condition 2 occupancy would require a minimum of two (2) smoke compartments to be provided (420.6).

Each smoke compartment must be provided with a refuge area sized to accommodate 15 sqft/care recipient plus 6 sqft/other occupant and "areas or spaces permitted to be included in the calculation of the refuge area are corridors, lounge or dining areas and other low-hazard areas" (420.6.1).

If each side of the smoke compartment is provided with an exterior lounge/amenity area, may this be used as the "refuge area" to meet the minimum required square footage?

Picture
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

A-5 Assembly Occupancy Appropriate for Canopy?

3/24/2025

13 Comments

 
My company just completed design/build construction of a canopy structure over a courtyard between two restaurant buildings located on the east & west sides.

We assigned an Occupancy Classification of A-5. The structure is all steel, other than the roof construction is comprised of the following layers: 22 gauge steel B deck, 7/16 inch OSB, 24 gauge metal standing seam. The standing seam contractor asked for a solid substrate, instead of metal to metal (Standing Seam attached to the B Deck.

We agreed to add the OSB. We examined the 2018 IBC and assessed that we could use the OSB. Our assessment concluded that the entire structure could be built with wood framing without sprinklers (A-5, no enclosures, height 37ft, 6,090 sf, Type V(A) Construction).

The AHJ shut us down and told us we needed to remove the OSB (combustible material).

What we didn't know was that the City and developer executed a Covenant Agreement that stipulated the Canopy was an A-3 Assembly occupancy. This was arranged because the developer didn't want the exterior restaurant walls to be fire-rated because of the ease of movement from the restaurant to the courtyard.

As a result, the OSB needs to be changed to fire-retardant-treated plywood.

Was the original classification of A-5 occupancy (which could have been wood) canopy assembly an acceptable approach?

Picture below, showing the galvanized steel deck.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Picture
13 Comments

Is Large Circulation Space a 'Corridor' in NFPA 101?

2/13/2025

6 Comments

 
Subject: Two story convenience opening separation from corridors.

NFPA 101 (2021 edition) Section 8.6.9.1 permits convenience openings for two adjacent stories. But, these convenience openings shall be separated from corridors (requirement #3) and
further states that separation should be by a smoke partition (requirement #5).

How do you define a corridor versus an open floor area or lobby per NFPA 101, since no definitions are given within the code?

Jurisdiction is required to follow NFPA 1 and NFPA 101.

For example, a building has a large assembly space on the second floor. All doors from the assembly space lead to a ~40'-0" wide circulation space (+200'-0" long in the other direction). To reach the building exit stair, occupants from the assembly room must traverse the 40'-0" wide circulation space. Within this circulation space is a ~20'-0" x 40'-0" vertical opening that connects the 1st and 2nd floor.

Should this circulation space be considered a corridor
, and should the vertical opening be prohibited from being classified as a convenience opening without a smoke partition separating from the corridor?

Or is the 2nd floor space to be considered an open floor area, with exits immediately accessible in different directions (NFPA 101 7.5.1.1.1) and not consider it a corridor?

​The width of the circulation space seems too wide to be defined as a corridor but NFPA only provides minimum width requirements for corridors, and no maximum width for a space to be considered a corridor as far as I can determine.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Picture
6 Comments

Code Require Changes When Adding EV Stations?

2/10/2025

12 Comments

 
Is there anything in the code that specifically talks about EV (Electric Vehicle) charging stations?

Anything that might say "If you are adding EV Stations in a garage the sprinkler system must be checked, upgraded or analyzed?"

​Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

How to Address Control Areas in Old Buildings?

1/27/2025

8 Comments

 
We are a large metropolitan area with multiple universities that have been operating for decades with high levels of hazardous materials. They want to have separated control areas, but their building construction does not meet current requirements.

On one side we can only enforce the code that these were built to, which was BOCA or even no building code at the time, but on the other hand, there is a reason why control areas came about in the first place.

As they cannot easily upgrade the structure to meet 2-hr requirements, I am planning on just using equivalent level of safety through sprinkler protection and other factors, but was wondering if anyone had experience doing enforcement like this?

Is NFPA 45 enforceable here?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

NFPA 101 (1-hr) or NFPA 90A (2-hr) in 4-Story Shaft?

1/21/2025

9 Comments

 
NFPA references are based on current editions. While NFPA 101, Section 30.3.1.1.4 (New Apartments) allows vertical penetrations to be protected with a 1-hour rating when sprinklered, NFPA 101, Section 30.5.2 requires HVAC equipment to comply with NFPA 90A.

According to NFPA 90A, Sections 9.1.3 and 6.8.3, a higher level of protection is required for shafts that penetrate more than four floors (2-hr fire rated and fire dampers).

Does the exception provided in NFPA 101 permit reducing the required fire rating to 1-hour for duct shafts, or does NFPA 90A take precedence?

I'm curious to hear different perspectives on this.

I can understand both sides of the issue but find it challenging to justify allowing a 1-hour fire rating for a vertical exit within a New Apartment while requiring a 2-hour fire rating for the duct shafts.


Thanks in advance.
​
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Are Townhouse Complexes Group R-2 or R-3?

1/2/2025

12 Comments

 
Are townhouse complexes (3 or more side by side and separated by fire barrier) considered R-2 or R-3?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

Use Fire-Rated Construction in lieu of Sprinklers?

10/31/2024

14 Comments

 
Is fire-rated construction ever enough to not warrant sprinkler protection?

Is there a NFPA 13 section that would validate this one way or another?

Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments

Why is 90-Minute Door Allowed in 2-Hr Barrier?

10/21/2024

7 Comments

 
Does anyone know the historical context of why a 90-minute door is permitted on a 2-hour barrier?

Why the 30-minute difference?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Fireproofing for Column on Exterior of Exit Stair?

10/14/2024

7 Comments

 
This is a corner exit stair in a 2-story Type II-B building. There is 2-hr fire separation per client request (only 1-hr by code).

There's one column in the corner that only supports exterior precast walls and roof structure. Does it need to be fireproofed?

I would assume it doesn't. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Picture
7 Comments

1-hour Req'd Between Riser Room & Townhouses?

7/29/2024

8 Comments

 
Imagine you have a 6-unit, true townhouse-construction building covered by the 2018 IRC under construction. It has an NFPA 13D sprinkler and a one-hour separation between units, but​ there is one common closet for the sprinkler riser and domestic water main. This closet is accessed only through a door on the exterior and is under the control of the landlord, not the tenant.

What is the code path to require any fire separation between that closet and the dwelling units?

There is no dog house off the side. The IRC only seems to call out separation between units, and even if you go into the IBC, it is not apparent.

Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Elevator Hoistway Be a 'Convenience Opening'?

7/5/2024

3 Comments

 
Can an elevator hoistway connecting two adjacent stories be considered a "convenience opening" and avoid a fire resistance rating altogether based on NFPA 5000?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

When is Deluge System Required for Stages?

4/3/2024

12 Comments

 
What are the deciding factors or requirements on when a deluge system would be required on a stage to separate the stage from the audience?

This would be for the proscenium opening protection.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

Does Fire Separation Negate Need for Sprinklers?

1/30/2024

10 Comments

 
I purchased a commercial condo recently. It’s been vacant and unfinished since 2013. It’s a shell, picture is below. It has 5 residential condos on top and 5 commercial condos on first floor, in a 3 story building. All residential units were sold and have been occupied since. One commercial unit was also built and has been occupied as a salon with a U & O.
Picture
There are no sprinklers, no fire room. They were going off of 2006 IBC code.

My architect prepared stamped plans with no sprinklers using the separated building scenario. It has a 2-hour horizontal separation, 3-5 hour vertical, no access to second floors. The plan was denied for sprinklers to be installed.

Now, I certainly understand safety, but it’s almost impossible to install now after 12 years.

Can you help me decipher mixed use B (1st floor) and R-3 (2nd and 3rd one unit)?

Is this approach allowed by code, or is the code official correct?

Is a self-contained fire area allowed to be its own building?

Please help, thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

A Limit to Tire Storage in Unsprinklered Building?

1/16/2024

6 Comments

 
We have a storage building that is non-sprinklered, it only has fire alarm. The ceiling height in some areas of the building with storage of tires is up to 10-ft in height, and others up to 15-ft in height.

How many tires can be stored?

Is there a limit to the amount of storage?

Does storing on tread or on side matter?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Use Sprinklers at Window Instead of 1-Hr Glazing?

1/15/2024

12 Comments

 
I have a project in the Miami area where there are some exterior glass panels that need to be 1-hour fire rated.

I specified the glass to be fire rated type, but it prices are coming back too high. The contractor is looking into an alternative of providing fire sprinkler protection on the inside face of the glass.

Is this a feasible idea?

The wall that the glass is part of requires the rating due to its being within 10' of some adjacent exterior glass.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

Is Drywall on One Side of Fire Barrier Acceptable?

12/29/2023

11 Comments

 
I’m wondering if you can help me on this one.

​I have a project with the detail below referencing the use of the U419 listed assembly, but with the drywall only on one side of the assembly. 
Picture
I asked for verification that the U419 assembly would permit this and he provided me with the attachment referencing section 5A. I don’t believe that was the intent for section 5A of the listing, but I can’t figure out what the actual intent is.

Is drywall on only one side of the assembly here correct?

Is it allowed anywhere?

It is something that has come up since there is a V497 listed assembly that puts both layers of drywall on one side of the wall, but my understanding has always been that it was used only on the interior side of exterior walls required only to be rated from the inside (IBC Section 705.5).

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. I appreciate your help.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

How to Recertify or Address Old FRT Wood?

11/21/2023

5 Comments

 
I am working on a project that has Fire-Retardant-Treated (FRT) wood that is over 50-years old.

The wood is installed in a conditioned space (not subjected to sunlight or rain, heated and cooled with moisture levels maintained like any building). The wood had different manufacturers with varying labels, but two did list the chemical used as PROTEXOL.

I'm struggling to find information for the efficacy of the FRT wood after so many years.

Do you have any information or recommendations for recertifying FRT wood with lab testing for the presence of the correct chemicals or subjecting samples to ASTM/UL/NFPA?

Any help is greatly appreciated.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

What is "Exposed" Combustible Construction?

10/16/2023

12 Comments

 
NFPA 13 in talking about concealed spaces uses the language "Concealed spaces of exposed combustible construction shall be protected by sprinklers."

What does the term "exposed" construction mean?

We have a wood deck structure with a steel frame and a un-heated attic; so trying to figure out how to solve this without a dry system (historic building so spray foam on the interior is economical).

It would be nice to put an ignition barrier/thermal barrier on the wood deck and then not provide a sprinkler system. (concrete deck of the attic).

Thanks in advance for your take.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

How Much Engine Oil Stored in an OH2 Building?

10/13/2023

5 Comments

 
How much engine oil can be stored in a building with an Ordinary Hazard Group 2 (OH2) sprinkler system?

We're working on a repair garage and NFPA 13 (2019) classifies repair garages as OH2 in the appendix. It seems reasonable that some amount of engine oil would be allowed to be stored. However, the NFPA 13 definition of OH2 doesn't allow for flammable/combustible liquids, but EH1 and EH2 allows for some unspecified amount of flammable/combustible liquids.

NFPA 13 section 26.2.1 states that sprinkler system discharge criteria for the protection of flammable and combustible liquids shall comply with NFPA 30. NFPA 30 (2021) table 10.7.1 allows for unlimited IIIB liquids to be stored in mercantile occupancies with an OH2 sprinkler system.

Can this mercantile section be applied to a storage occupancy?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

Use 13, 13R, or Both, for Mixed M+R Occupancy?

9/22/2023

9 Comments

 
We have a rehab of a two story with a walk out basement where they are going to expand the basement level and make it mercantile with the two upper floors being R-2.

This is Type V-B construction and they are proposing to 1-hour horizontal to separate the mercantile from the R use. They are wanting to use the standpipes as their sprinkler risers.

My question is three-fold:
1. Can they sprinkler the entire building with 13R, or
2. Can they omit sprinklers completely in the mercantile if they separate from the R use by 1-hour (the mercantile by itself would not require sprinkler protection,
3. Can they sprinkler the mercantile with 13 and the R use 13R without a rated separation?

I am an AHJ and only wanting to require what the Code requires. I am having trouble deciphering the requirements.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Exterior Wall of Fire Pump Room Require Rating?

7/20/2023

11 Comments

 
Architect here with a fire code question. We have a fully sprinklered building (ESFR), of Type II-B, tilt concrete construction.

The fire pump room is located on an exterior wall, and the only door into the pump room is from the exterior. We have 1-hr rated construction separating the fire pump room from the rest of the building.

The fire marshal is telling us that the exterior wall and door also have to be rated. I responded by pointing out the fire pump is required to be protected from the surrounding building, and that it does not need to be protected from the exterior, so exterior wall and door should not have to be rated.

Fire marshal disagrees and pointed to NFPA 20 4.14.1.1.2. That section does not specifically state that separation is required from the rest of the building, although Section 4.14.1.1.1 right before it does make that distinction, just like IBC/IFC do.

We have solid concrete walls that are inherently fire rated construction, so typically I would just say ok and label them rated. The issue is we are required to have ventilation in the pump room per NFPA 20, so we have a makeup air louver in the exterior wall. If we rate the wall, then my understanding is we will have to put a fire/smoke damper on that louver, which is added cost and unnecessary in my opinion.

Is your understanding that all walls have to be rated as the fire marshal is saying, or just the walls between pump room and rest of building?

I've done many buildings of this type in multiple states and this is the first time I've been told this. I'd appreciate your insight, thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

Code Basis to Replace Old Fire/Smoke Damper?

7/11/2023

5 Comments

 
Four-story office building wants to shut down five large air handlers nightly. Purpose is to lower energy costs when building is unoccupied. This will cause all fire/smoke dampers (FSDs) to close (the smoke detectors in return ducts need minimum operational air velocity).

The FSDs are mostly original from 1985-1988. Only UL tested for 5000 cycles and no dynamic.

I cannot find a code reference to prohibit this and believe that the FSDs are already near the end of their functional lifespan. Many have been replaced due to bad actuators, binding jack shafts and missing blades.

Anyone know of a code reference to prohibit this use or when a FSD must be replaced?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
<<Previous
    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT