MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinkler Req'd Below Wood Stairs in NFPA 13R?

8/31/2023

3 Comments

 
In the stairway, on the 2nd floor only of 4-story wood-framed condo (NFPA 13R), do we require a sprinkler on the “extended landing” ?

In the attached image Blue is the sprinkler in question, red are the required sprinklers.
Picture
The main floor requires coverage because it has two entrances / exits from the stairway. The upper floor has full protection of the entire area. The 3rd floor does not require protection as the 4th floor does not have a extended landing. So this only applies to the 2nd Floor.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Ground Floor Standpipe Hose Connection Req'd?

8/30/2023

13 Comments

 
Regarding: IFC 905.4 Location of Class I standpipe hose connections.

Class I standpipe hose connections shall be provided in all of the following locations: 1.in every required interior exit stairway, a hose connection shall be provided for each story above and below grade plane,. Hose connections shall be located at the main floor landing unless otherwise approved by the fire code official.

Does this mean a standpipe connection is not needed at the ground floor?

I've brought this up to numerous design/build sprinkler subs and they all say a connection is required at the ground floor.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments

Tank Size for Simultaneous Sprinkler & Fire Flow?

8/29/2023

6 Comments

 
Long question - in essence - is Fire Flow considered on top of a flowing sprinkler system?

Recently there was a great discussion on the forum here about whether a water storage tank size needs to include Fire Flow in addition to sprinkler demand. There were some great points made (www.meyerfire.com/daily/must-water-storage-tank-include-site-fire-flow).

I have just come upon a project where we do have a municipal water supply, but it tapers off very steeply. The flow test in the area was 52 psi static, 25 psi residual at only 650 gpm. This would put the available Fire Flow around 712 gpm at 20 psi for the site.

In order for the AHJ to reduce the required Fire Flow under the IFC, the building(s) nearby need to be sprinkler-protected. This would bring down the Fire Flow requirement to 1,000 gpm at 2-hours, for this setup. The sprinkler system isn't designed yet, but we'd estimate around a 550-650 gpm demand with a fire pump. This gets really interesting based on the prior discussion.


When the fire department shows up on site during a fire, and then starts to pull water, is this Fire Flow in addition to the flowing sprinkler system, or considered separate?

In other words, is the 1,000 gpm (for 2 hours) for Fire Flow on top of a 600 gpm demand for sprinkler (for 60 minutes)?


If the water storage tank needs to meet the demand of the sprinkler and Fire Flow separately, then the calculation comes down to ~300 gpm needed to fill the shortage on Fire Flow, multiplied by 2-hours. That's a tank in the ballpark of 35-40,000 gallons.

If the water storage tank needs to meet the Fire Flow as the sprinkler system is operating, that's a flow of around 1,600 gpm to fight a fire. That's as much as ~900 gpm x 2 hours to a ballpark of 100-115,000 gallons. Huge difference.


I can't find any relevant code that stipulates one way or another, only that the tank must supply the sources it is connected to. 

Am I looking at this correctly? I see sprinkler and Fire Flow needing to be met by a tank that they're connected to, but is the Fire Flow robbing the sprinkler system, or vice-versa?

Thanks so much for reading. This is obviously TLTHFR (too long, thank-you-for-reading).

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Diesel Generator Startup for Electric Fire Pump?

8/28/2023

9 Comments

 
Recently a client determined that they no longer want diesel fire pumps to be provided on their projects. They want electric fire pumps with a diesel generator to ensure reliable power. (Please do not ask why state this desire.)

If a diesel generator is provided strictly for the electric pump assembly, what mechanism do you utilize to turn the generator on when fire pump needs to start up?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

How to Determine the Reserve Amount of Foam?

8/25/2023

6 Comments

 
What is the correct procedure for determining the quantity of the reserve amount of foam, such as FP 3%, for a plant?

I've looked specifically through NFPA 11 and NFPA 16, and can't determine it.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Pathway Survivability Only Apply to ECS?

8/24/2023

6 Comments

 
In NFPA 72, does Pathway Survivability apply only to Emergency Communication systems?

In the 2019 Edition of NFPA 72, Section 12.4 stipulates required protection regarding various levels. Section 24.3 Pathway Survivability defines requirements for different levels of declaration. Chapter 12 applies for all fire alarm wiring.

However, the title of Chapter 24 is for Emergency Communication systems. Does pathway survivability apply only for Emergency Communication systems only?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe​
6 Comments

Minimum Pressure for ESFR at Low-Pile Storage?

8/23/2023

3 Comments

 
When using ESFR sprinklers to protect a low-piled storage/miscellaneous storage that is equivalent to an OH2 curve: what minimum operating pressure for the sprinkler do you use?

Do you just go by the nearest chart in the later storage chapters and go with the closest to your situation (so like 35 for a K16.8 and 15 psi for a K22)?

Or do you just go with 7 psi like you do a standard sprinkler?

The listings do not specify a minimum operating pressure except to say "per NFPA 13". Code references are always appreciated. Thank you for your time.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Provide a 750 or 1,000 GPM Pump for Standpipes?

8/22/2023

10 Comments

 
I have a standpipe demand of 750gpm. I am providing a fire pump for the system demand.

Should I be selecting a 750 gpm pump or a 1000 gpm pump, based on adding a safety factor (or other reasoning)?

My sprinkler demand is less than 750 gpm so I would only need to provide the 750 gpm for the standpipes. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Does a Private Fire Hydrant Require Backflow?

8/21/2023

11 Comments

 
In the NFPA series of standards, is there a requirement for a water line supplying private fire hydrants to have backflow protection?

I am working on a project where the fire marshal is requiring double check detector assemblies to be installed on six private fire hydrants. The line serving the hydrants has no other connections to it.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

AHJs Accepting Private-Commissioned UL Test?

8/18/2023

9 Comments

 
UL does large scale testing reports conducted under paid private clients, and has commissioned some pretty large tests on certain fire sprinklers with a specific protected target and issue report.

How many AHJs would accept a performance-based design or something submitted in compliance with the old Chapter 21 on Alternative Fire Protection?

Do you have recommendations or concerns with these alternative approaches that you wish to have addressed?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Standpipe Required in Stairs 30-ft Apart?

8/17/2023

9 Comments

 
We have a 3-family building with parking garage and three floors over parking for a total of four floors.

According to the IBC, a standpipe is required; my question is - is the standpipe required in all stairs?

We have two stars which are less than 30-feet between the stairs. 

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

How to Protect Battery Energy Storage (BESS)?

8/16/2023

6 Comments

 
What is the recommended practice to protect Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)?

NFPA 855 states that if the BESS is not a walk-in unit, then fire suppression is not required.

How do you define a "walk-in unit"?

If any suppression is not required in side the unit, is there any requirement for systems protecting the outside?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Thread: Is a Post-Indicator Valve Required?

8/16/2023

0 Comments

 
A thread to discuss more on Post-Indicator Valve requirements from our blog hits series.

Original 2019 article link: www.meyerfire.com/blog/post-indicator-valve-required-for-my-project
Picture
0 Comments

Noncombustible Storage Considered "High-Pile"?

8/15/2023

8 Comments

 
Our customer stores pieces of metal u-channel strut and all thread rod that are stacked on steel cantilever racks. There are no pallets. Packaging is by wrapping of steel bands. Everything is non-combustible.

Since the commodity is non-combustible, Table 435.5.1 for high piled racking does not apply, correct?

It seems to apply only to combustible commodities. Therefore the 12-foot high limitation triggering high-pile storage requirements would not apply, right?

We hope to avoid the requirements of Table 435.5.1 since the building does not meet the fire department access door requirements even though it does meet the requirements for automatic sprinklers as well as smoke and heat removal.

I can't find a code section to cite to AHJ for what is not required on non-combustible commodities. Like proving a negative. Any suggestions would be appreciated!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

How to Sprinkler Protect Open Baffle Ceiling?

8/14/2023

7 Comments

 
What are the requirements for sprinkler coverage for baffled ceilings?

In Florida we use the 2016 edition of NFPA 13. I know that the sprinklers have to be within 12 inches of ceiling for heat collection. The contractor says the pictures shown are correct.

I think they need to place a 12 by 12 above the baffle for heat collection?

I found 8.6.3.4 Minimum Distances Between Sprinklers.
  • 8.6.3.4.1 Unless the requirements of 8.6.3.4.2, 8.6.3.4.3, or 8.6.3.4.4 are met, sprinklers shall be spaced not less than 6 ft (1.8 m) on center.
  • 8.6.3.4.2 Sprinklers shall be permitted to be placed less than 6 ft (1.8 m) on center where the following conditions are satisfied: (1) Baffles shall be arranged to protect the actuating elements. (2) Baffles shall be of solid and rigid material that will stay in place before and during sprinkler operation. (3) Baffles shall be not less than 8 in. (200 mm) long and 6 in. (150 mm) high. (4) The tops of baffles shall extend between 2 in. and 3 in. (50 mm and 75 mm) above the deflectors of upright sprinklers. (5) The bottoms of baffles shall extend downward to a level at least even with the deflectors of pendent sprinklers.

If sprinklers are installed above and below the ceiling, a baffle needs to be installed around the lower sprinkler to avoid cold soldering. Cold soldering occurs when discharged water from the sprinkler above cools the thermal element of the sprinkler below, preventing or delaying its activation in the event of the fire. The required baffle will prevent that water from contacting the thermal element of the sprinkler, thus circumventing the possible issue.
​
​Talked to some folks and we need the product paperwork as it may mention sprinkler coverage.
Picture
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Air Vent Required for CPVC Antifreeze System?

8/11/2023

7 Comments

 
Does NFPA 13D require trapped air to be removed in a sprinkler system?

In the 2016 NFPA 13, Section 7.1.5, Air Venting - a single air vent for a sprinkler system, with a connection conforming to 8.16.6, shall be provided in each wet pipe system utilizing metallic pipe.

I am using CPVC with anti-freeze in most residential systems.

Is there a code requirement for a vent for what I'm doing?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

How to Address Water Supply w/ Replacements?

8/10/2023

9 Comments

 
How do I, as an AHJ, address contractor scope limitations?

Project where an installer presents plans to replace 328 sprinklers and is changing some pipes out. Many times the installer says they're only responsible for pipe from the riser - not for a hydrant flow tests. 

What is the best way to navigate this to be sure that there's still sufficient water available?

It could be a one-for-one replacement, but what if there's significant work being done - what code basis is there to make sure than an effectively-new system can work with today's water supply?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Thread: Components of a Fire Sprinkler

8/9/2023

11 Comments

 
We had a tip last week about being able to comment and share ideas from our articles on the Blog and our hits series - and we love the idea. The hope is to open a thread once-a-week concerning the Blog topics so we can expand and discuss in greater detail.

My hope is that this doesn't take away from the Forum at all (again, just once a week), but allows opportunity for further discussion where it's wanted.​
Picture
This thread is for Components of a Fire Sprinkler, with our high-quality image above (right-click to download and save).

Thanks everyone!

- Joe
11 Comments

Is a Duct 3'-11" Wide and 18.1" Below Sprinkler OK?

8/9/2023

9 Comments

 
This is something that has always confused me.

NFPA 2019 Section 10.2.7.3.1 states that continuous or non-continuous obstructions more than 18" below the deflector have to meet Section 10.2.7.3. The only big requirement I see is that items over 4-ft in width need a sprinkler underneath them.

Does that mean that a sprinkler 18.1" located directly above a square duct that is 3'-11" wide does not need to worried about and the perceived obstruction of the duct is fine by code?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Allowed to Isolate a Hose Valve on Standpipe?

8/8/2023

7 Comments

 
Are you allowed to have a valve off the standpipe feeding a hose valve that is not in the stairwell?

Working in a high rise building with two stairwells. It is dual fed with combination riser standpipes.

On the tenant space there is a hose valve and they want a butterfly on the feed for the hose valve, always thought that was not allowed but couldn’t find it.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Add Hose Connection to the Sprinkler System?

8/7/2023

5 Comments

 
Occasionally, additional hose valve connections are required due to the failure of meeting a 150-ft / 200-ft travel distance to a hose connection.

Can you put a hose valve connection on a sprinkler system without a standpipe?

How do you reflect this in a hydraulic calculation?

A most-remote standpipe would require 500 gpm in a standpipe calculation. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

One Deluge Valve for Two Generator Rooms?

8/4/2023

10 Comments

 
We have a project where a foam-water system is installed for two generator rooms. The rooms are on the same floor and some distance from each other, which is also on the same floor as the fire pump, which is served by a vertical foam bladder tank.

I've read here before that it's possible to have one proportioner serving both of them, but is it possible to have one deluge valve to serve both rooms?

If so, do I need to add motorized butterfly valves to regulate the flow direction?

Really appreciate the input.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Can Fire Pump Feed Standpipe But Not Sprinkler?

8/3/2023

26 Comments

 
​I am currently evaluating a 7-story building that is being partially renovated and has an existing standpipe system (2 standpipes), but no sprinklers. My scope was to add sprinklers to the renovated areas, creating a partially sprinklered building.

The lack of pressure is leading the AHJ to require a fire pump due the 100 psi required for the standpipe system.

While the standpipe requires the fire pump, hydrant flow tests indicate that there may be sufficient pressure to supply a sprinkler system.

My question is two-fold. Is there really such a thing as a non-combined sprinkler/standpipe system where they are both required?

They both get their water supply from the same source.

Also, can I evaluate supplying the sprinkler system through a separate riser that tees off before the fire pump, while the fire pump supplies only the standpipe, significantly reducing the size of the pump?

The pump would be sized for 750 gpm total, 500 gpm @ 100 psi to the remote hose connections, and 250 gpm to the second standpipe.

What would that sprinkler calculation look like?

Would the sprinkler calculation remove the hose stream allowance and replace it with the 750 gpm to consider the flow to the pump/standpipes?

The flow potential is there based on the hydrant flow test just not the pressure for the standpipes (and it's close for sprinklers). I'm just wondering if I can give the client and rest of the design team options.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
26 Comments

Thanks to Our Top July 2023 Contributors!

8/3/2023

 
You all are simply the best. Thanks for bein' in the club.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Why is a Hose Allowance Required?

8/2/2023

9 Comments

 
I have a question in regards to hydraulic calculation and hose stream allowance being added to the calculations.

When and why are they added to your hydraulic calculations?

Is this specifically required under NFPA 13 somewhere regardless if a standpipe is required or provided?

Any insight or clarification would be greatly appreciated.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
<<Previous
    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT