MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

What Could Cause Leaks in Older 6-Story Condo?

4/28/2023

8 Comments

 
We have a 6-story condo building. It's an NFPA 13 system on the first floor, and NFPA 13D with PVC piping above.

Over the years this building has had leaking sprinklers. The last two leaks were within a week of each other, one in the second floor laundry room and one in the large lobby sitting area.

The leaks have been found by residents; no waterflow alarms. The sprinkler company who put it in is still doing yearly testing and maintenance. The fire units for these two events found the pressures in the stairwells at 150 psi. The jockey pump turns on at 120 and off at 133.

The sprinkler company says the sprinklers in the PVC piping are leaking at the fitting behind the sprinkler and not the sprinkler itself.

The connection between the sprinkler and the fitting was either cross threaded or over torqued.

Last week I found the gauge on the 6th floor reading 110 psi and the 1st floor at 130 psi.

Can pressures of 150 psi plus at extended periods of time cause the leaking?

The pipe is rated to 175 psi. The building was built in 1989.

And for my own knowledge-the pressure in systems of this type are this high for what reason?

We are told the pressures are typical. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

When is a Wall with Equipment Load-Bearing?

4/27/2023

6 Comments

 
UL designs discuss loading-bearing and non-load bearing walls.

I haven't seem many where they discuss when, say, electrical, fire pump, fire alarm panels or other equipment are mounted on the walls.

At what point do you have to consider the objects on the wall and consider the wall as load-bearing?

It may just be a structural question, but my structural contacts have said not to worry but I wanted to hear others opinions. Thank you in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

A Minimum Safety Factor for FM Global Projects?

4/26/2023

18 Comments

 
Is there an FM Global requirement for a minimum safety factor in a hydraulic calculation?

We have a project that is following FM requirements, and the calculation "safety cushion" is coming in at 2 PSI.

We have looked through the FM Data Sheets, but cannot find anything to give a minimum criteria.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
18 Comments

Does Egress Apply to Car-Stacking Garage?

4/25/2023

8 Comments

 
Is there an egress requirement for a garage structure that only houses the car stacker, with 10 bays and 3 levels?

What would a code path be for or against such a requirement?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe

8 Comments

Deep 18-inch Beams Obstructed or Unobstructed?

4/24/2023

16 Comments

 
I have a non-combustible shell building with 18-inch steel beams under corrugated metal deck.

Some of the beams are spaced in excess of 7'-6" apart, but not exceeding 9'-6" and creating an area exceeding 300 sq. ft.

To loosely summarize definitions, per NFPA 13, 2019 edition Section A.3.3.41.1 for Obstructed Construction, Beam and Girder Construction, the steel beams are to be spaced between 3 ft. up to 7½ ft.

Panel Construction requires that all cross-sectional areas be filled including the interface at the roof, (which this is not the case on my project), and not exceed the 300 sq. ft. area.

My question is this, since this building does not meet either criteria and is not combustible construction, (no wood is being utilized in the structure), there are no concrete tees being utilized and there are no bar joists present, would this then be considered as Unobstructed?

My thoughts are no, and that this is still Obstructed Construction, however I can't find a proper definition within the Obstructed Construction definition.

I am wanting to know if I can utilize the 1" to 6" below Obstructed Construction allowance however I am held up by the definition of the construction type and am unsure if I need to space within the bays or if I can space below the 18-inch steel beams.

Any thoughts or input on this would be greatly appreciated.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
16 Comments

Double-Wall Diesel Tank Require a Reservoir?

4/21/2023

16 Comments

 
Does a double wall diesel tank require a reservoir?

​Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
16 Comments

Does "Vertical Change in Elevation" Affect ESFR?

4/20/2023

7 Comments

 
Does NFPA 13 2022 Section 10.2.6.1.1.3 about "Vertical Change in Ceiling Elevation Greater Than 36 in." apply to all types of sprinklers?

I have a contractor who argues that the paragraph does not apply to ESFR sprinklers.

The design has a change in elevation of 14-feet and the last sprinkler on the high-bay side is 8'-4" feet horizontally from the vertical plane. 
Picture
Thanks for helping settle the disagreement here. 

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Code Basis for No Sprinklers at 100-ft Overhang?

4/19/2023

9 Comments

 
I have sprinklers at an exterior overhang over 100 feet above the floor (ground) it protects. There will not be anything stored directly beneath the overhang.

There is occupiable space above the overhang. It's noncombustible construction; a mid-rise office tower.

Questions have been brought up about heat collection, and the effectiveness of sprinkler spray: if there was a fire on the ground level, will enough heat be collected at the overhang 100-ft up in order to operate an intermediate temperature sprinkler that is 286 degrees F?

What will happen if there are high winds (common for this area)?

And if the sprinklers do discharge, will the water spray droplets evaporate before reaching a proximity of effectiveness?

Will a "cooling effect" even happen?

The AHJ will allow the sprinklers to be omitted. I'm not seeing anything specific to very high ceilings in NFPA 13 (2016).

My question to you all: Where can I find the science to backup their decision?

Do you know of any resources where this scenario has been studied, evaluated, or fire-modeled? (FM or non-FM?)

Obtaining a PE review is not a desirable option. (I am aware that FM datasheets address this scenario as requiring sprinklers.) Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Use Fire Alarm Notification for Gas Leaks?

4/18/2023

10 Comments

 
I'm currently looking at a water treatment plant.

Electrical design wanted to coordinate using the same horn/strobes to notify for a chlorine gas leak, as it would avoid being redundant and putting up their own horn/strobes to go off during a leak.

This would require hooking up a non-fire related notification appliance to the fire alarm panel.

What are thoughts on this?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Where is "Bottom of Riser" for 7-Story Building?

4/17/2023

24 Comments

 
I'm working on an existing system in a seven-story building. There is an existing pump and piping which snakes its way through the building.

There is a pressure gauge at the inlet and outlet of the pump, but none afterward until 200' away from the pump room. The pipe branches off with a zone valve assembly with pressure gauge serving that floor area, and then upwards through the remaining floors with no gauge.

Zone valve assemblies with gauges are located on the floors above.

Now for my question - when performing hydraulic calculations, where would you indicate the "bottom of riser"?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
24 Comments

How to Fix Fluctuating Pressure on Pump Suction?

4/14/2023

5 Comments

 
Hi everyone - thanks for answering my previous questions and for checking out today's as well.

I have three projects all connected to the same central fire pump assembly. It's a huge network of pipe running for miles. 

The client is having a problem with the fluctuating pressure (up and down) on the network for some reason that affects the fire pump's suction pressure. It's in series, and connected to each project.

The client refuses to add a break tank and cut the fluctuation. 

In your experience, is there any alternative solution available? 

Would a pressure relief valve help? What would happen when the pressure is less than design?

Thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

Separate FDC Required for Each NFPA 14 Zone?

4/13/2023

7 Comments

 
In regards to installing pressure reducing stations for separating areas of the building into different pressure zones, NFPA 14 calls out that the FDC needs to be installed downstream of the pressure reducing valves.

Is a separate FDC required for each pressure zone?

If you provide just one FDC, and the fire department supplies the system for an upper floor of a high-rise, you will exceed the maximum working pressure of the lower systems. I'm not sure how that's possible to avoid.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

How to Hang Pipe from Extremely Old Wood?

4/12/2023

11 Comments

 
What concerns should I have about hanging from old wood?

Like very old wood, almost petrified?

Picture
I'm doing an NFPA 13R job for an old historic building that has been moved. I don't know how old, but it uses full dimension wood. The 2x's look like they measure 2-inches thick.

I'm wondering what hanging to this old dry wood is going to be like?

Do they need to predrill? Are screws better?

Any ideas appreciated!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

Concerns for Leaving Dry-Valve as a Wet System?

4/11/2023

9 Comments

 
What are the physical or regulatory concerns of leaving an older dry pipe valve as wet for an extended amount of time?

This would be during the non-freezing months.

I can think of the alarm trim - water gong changed to electric, clapper gasket integrity, and the inevitable leaks in the overhead system.

Curious on other perspectives, thank you!

​
9 Comments

What Hazard Classification for 8-ft Self-Storage?

4/10/2023

20 Comments

 
I am working on a project with a new client who develops multi-level Self Storage Facilities.

The typical units are 10'x20' with 8-ft bent metal purlin dividing walls. The walls do not extend to the ceiling deck which is 11'-6" above finished floor.

All sorts of household items are being stored, which can include exposed expanded foam mattresses that are greater than 5-ft in height when on their side. The tenants are limited in storage height to 8-ft because of 14 gauge metal wire netting above the units.

On previous projects the client has been permitted to classify the hazard as OH2 (possibly because of the definition in NFPA 13, 5.3.2. 2016 edition, which includes contents with high-heat release rates up to 8-ft).

The question is whether or not it should be Extra Hazard Group 1 or Extra Hazard Group 2?

I am leaning towards EH1.

The occupancy is a storage facility so I believe we fall into Chapter 12 for our design requirements. Because we have exposed expanded plastics stored greater than 5-ft we cannot be considered Low-Piled (Chapter 13). Therefore we fall into Chapter 15.

Using NFPA13 Table 15.2.2.5(a) and the decision tree, selecting plastic commodities, Group A, Expanded, Exposed, Unstable, I believe the Density would be 0.30 gpm/sqft. This would be EH1.

I am using NFPA13, 2016 edition.

Can anyone speak to how they would classify the hazard (design area and density) for this type of storage facility?

​Should it be OH2, EH1 or EH2?

Thank you.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
20 Comments

What is MAQ for a High Hazard H-3 Occupancy?

4/7/2023

11 Comments

 
We have a customer who is building a storage building that includes flammable liquids.

The liquids are Class I-B flammable (as classified under NFPA 30).

I understand that there are limits for the quantity that is allowed within one control area. The Maximum Allowable Quantity (MAQ) is 120 gallons, from NFPA 30 tables. The reading can be increased 100% when a sprinkler system is used. 

So the limit increases to 240 gallons with sprinkler protection.

The number can increase even more when stored in approved liquid storage cabinets or safety cans, which I assume the customer would prefer.

So the final MAQ becomes 240 gallons x 2 = 480 gallons.

The biggest storage room is 2,000 square feet and the customer wants to exceed the MAQ to be above 480 gallons in that storage room.

I have understood that exceeding the MAQ is permitted if the building is classified as an H-3 Occupancy (High Hazard). This occupancy applies more restrictive requirements. 

Is there any numerical value for a new MAQ limit in that case?

My current path is as follows:
Class I-B liquid storage in Storage occupancy > maximum MAQ exceeded > building re-classified as H-3 Occupancy > but where is the new MAQ?

Thanks in advance for your input. I usually design under SFS and CEA standards, and they don't have the same MAQ concept within those standards.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

Thanks to Our Top March 2023 Contributors!

4/6/2023

0 Comments

 
Thanks to everyone for another great month on the forum, and a shout out to our top ten forum contributors for March 2023 below as well! Perhaps it's just my own anecdotal experience, but it sure seems like we have lots more involvement and through discussions here than we have ever had before. I very much enjoy the company.
​ - Joe
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

Does NFPA 13D Fire Pump Require Backup Power?

4/6/2023

12 Comments

 
Does a fire pump on an NFPA 13D system require backup power?

It seems like it should, but 13D does not say that it has to and does not reference NFPA 20.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

Group A in Plastic Totes: Exposed or Cartoned?

4/5/2023

8 Comments

 
Would the rack storage of non-encapsulated, Group A, unexpanded plastic commodities, stored in solid plastic containers (totes), be considered cartoned or exposed?

NFPA-13 Section 3.9.1.1 defines cartoned as storage consisting of corrugated cardboard or paperboared containers fully enclosing the commodity.

NFPA-13 Section 3.9.1.13 defines Exposed Group A Plastic Commodites as those plastics not in packaging or coverings that absorb water.

This leads me to think that any rack storage of Group A unexpanded plastics within solid plastic containers should be considered exposed, as these are not cardboard or paperboard nor does plastic absorb water.

Thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Is Domestic Tap Allowed from an NFPA 13 Riser?

4/4/2023

16 Comments

 
We have an NFPA 13 commercial project.

Do you allow a domestic water tap coming from an NFPA 13 fire sprinkler riser?

If it is allowed, what provisions should I be looking for when reviewing a layout with this arrangement?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
16 Comments

A Code-Path for Non-Combustible Rack Storage?

4/3/2023

12 Comments

 
This feels like a silly question, but we have high-piled, non-combustible storage, with open-grate or solid level single/double row permanent racks with Extra Hazard Group 2 overhead system.

I'm trying to identify the actual code verbiage that says nothing is required from an code/NFPA standpoint.

The product is metallic car parts with no added materials, just exposed solid metal, no plastic gaskets or spacers, etc.

The 2015 IFC is the highest code in my jurisdiction, so starting with that, Chapter 32 is for High-Piled "Combustible" Storage and provides no avenue for code justification.

NFPA 13-2013 defines "Noncombustible Material & Automotive Components on Portable Racks" but also gives no criteria for non-combustible storage.

FM Global Data Sheet 8-1 actually lists noncombustible as a commodity classification, unlike NFPA 13, but does not provide a criteria stating no coverage.

Is this just the simple scenario where code or NFPA standards don't list a requirement or criteria because it just doesn't require anything?

Again I feel like it's a silly question given the commodity but I believe the only rules to follow would be obstruction rules and distance from deflector to storage.

Thoughts?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT