MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Shared Fire Line Monitored by Only One Building?

3/26/2025

6 Comments

 
Before people say, "Ask the AHJ," I am him; he is me.

I have an applicant who has combined plots of land with a mid-rise and some detached townhouses. A shared fire line supplies the two structures, but only the mid-rise FACP monitors the supply tamper.

The townhouse FACP will not know if the water is off (except for the tampers at the risers within the townhouse).

The buildings are owned by the same ownership. They are arguing they are technically meeting IBC 2015 903.4 "Valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems, pumps, tanks, water levels, and temperatures, critical air pressures, and waterflow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically supervised by a listed fire alarm control unit."

It is being monitored, but the fire marshal and I are of the opinion this doesn't provide monitoring for the townhouse and does not meet the intent of the code.

Does anyone have any thoughts on whether a shared line can be monitored by only one building that it serves?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Does a Hydrant Fed From Building Meet Code?

3/4/2025

14 Comments

 
My jurisdiction (I am the AHJ) has had several buildings built with private hydrants supplying the sprinkler system where the main comes into the building, through the RPZ, feeds the sprinkler system/standpipes, and leaves the building and feeds the hydrant(s).
Picture
This has always seemed counterintuitive to me, at best. I feel we are "robbing Peter to pay Paul" and have wondered if this arrangement will adequately supply the sprinkler system when we (FD) pull water from the hydrant and pump it back into the FDC.

Per our state law, private hydrants have to be "protected" with a backflow.

Is this configuration code compliant, and if not, what is a solution?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments

Is Automatic Drain Required for Remote FDC?

1/29/2025

7 Comments

 
In an area subject to freezing, we have a remote FDC that supplies a riser room at the same level. The feed is through underground pipe.

Is the base of the FDC required to have an automatic drain similar to what's at the base of dry barrel fire hydrants?

If not, how are these FDC's typically drained after use?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Drainage for Underground Pipe to Remote FDC?

9/12/2024

8 Comments

 
Is there any particular drainage pipe requirements needed for an FDC that makes a U-loop underground?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Can a 90-degree Elbow Be Beneath a Footing?

9/2/2024

7 Comments

 
Can a fitting (a 90-degree elbow) from a fire ductile iron water line be under the footing, which turns the pipe up into the Fire Pump room?

In other words, the pipe feed comes from a water tank underground, then turns up with a 90 under the building footing and the pipes through the footing.

Is this acceptable?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Fire Hydrant Max Spacing and Distance to Bldgs?

8/16/2024

8 Comments

 
I have a bunch of new houses going in. Some are along an existing street, and some are around a newly formed cul-de-sac.

How do I determine the number of hydrants, how far apart they are, and the maximum distance to any of the homes?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Does Each Building Need Own Isolation Valve?

8/9/2024

11 Comments

 
If I have a fire tap that services multiple buildings, is it required to have a service valve outside the building on each line?

Does each building need to be capable of being isolated in case of service needs without interrupting others?

As it is, if one building needs work done to the #1 valve on the backflow then the other buildings will have to lose water during repair.

Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

Thrust Block Volume Much Greater than Shape?

8/7/2024

6 Comments

 
MeyerFire has a great thrust block calculator that appears to match NFPA 13’s annex/appendix exactly.
https://www.meyerfire.com/blog/a-new-thrust-block-calculator-part-i
 
How can the thrust block volume fit within the dimensions of the thrust block?
 
The default entries, for example, give a thrust block volume of 57.8 ft³ (NFPA 13 Equation A.6.6.1c), a base height of 2.2 ft, and a base width of 4.27 ft.  This meets the bearing area required by the equations.
 
NFPA 13, Figure A.6.6.1(b) gives the angle between the base of the thrust block and the pipe as 45°. This makes the thrust block a pyramid shape but ends with a pipe instead of coming to a tip. The Figure shows both vertical and horizontal angles as 45°, but that wouldn’t work unless the height and width are equal.  If 45° is the minimum angle, then the width of 4.27 ft would control the distance from the base of the pyramid to the pipe. If each side has a 45° angle, this distance would be half the width or 2.135 ft.  These dimensions can be used with the pyramid volume formula to give another method to check the thrust block volume.
 
The pyramid formula is V = L*W*H/3, which gives a volume of 6.7 ft³.  This is very different from the NFPA equation result.   Even if the thrust block was poured as a cube, its volume would be V = L*W*H, which is 20 ft³ -- still much smaller than the NFPA value. – I am counting the tip of the pyramid, which is part of the pipe, not the thrust block. It would be more accurate to exclude the tip, lowering the required volume slightly, but it would be harder to calculate.
 
If the pyramid were 57.8 ft³ with a bearing area of 2.2 ft by 4.27 ft, then it would need a distance from the pipe of 18 feet.
 
I think there is something wrong with Equation A.6.6.1c in NFPA 13.  It doesn’t make sense that it cancels the thrust force with the weight of the fill material. If you could use some incredibly dense fill material (pretend fantasy fill that is 8670 lb/ft³), then the thrust block volume would be 1 ft³ by that formula, but how is that small thrust block volume going to transfer the thrust forces onto a large enough soil surface? 
Picture
The weight of the thrust block material should not be related to calculating the volume of fill material required.
 
Another issue I see with the equation is that it is suddenly using T = P*A*sin(theta) while all previous formulas were using T = P*A*sin(theta/2). 

Why did the angle change for this formula?

Thanks in advance for any insight you could shed on the difference in volume versus shape with the NFPA formulas.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Does Pipe Under Walkway Need Depth of Cover?

5/29/2024

9 Comments

 
We have a scenario where the fire riser will be installed after the building is completed.

If the pipe is located below the pedestrian walkway area, is this required to comply with NFPA 13, 2022, (6.4.2.2.2 In locations where freezing is not a factor, the depth of cover shall not be less than 30 in. (750 mm) below grade to prevent mechanical damage. [24:10.4.2.2.2])?

See the attached sketch. If yes, what is the possible solution?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Picture
9 Comments

Is a 4"-6" Discharge OK for Sprinklers & Hydrants?

5/17/2024

4 Comments

 
Can a 4" pump with 4"-6" discharge fitting be used on a private 10" combination line (fire suppression and hydrants)?

NFPA 24 Section 13.1 states that no line less than 6" shall service a hydrant. But does the fact that NFPA 20 Section 4.16 allows the 4"-6" discharge fitting as part of the pump assembly overrule this?

Thanks in advance.

​
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments

Maximum Length from Hydrant to Water Main?

5/3/2024

7 Comments

 
Hi all, what is the maximum length of the connection from the hydrant to the fire water main?

​NFPA 24 mentions that the minimum size is 6" but couldn't find anything related to the pipe length. Thanks


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Limit for Length and Size for Underground Loops?

4/26/2024

11 Comments

 
Typically when I work on campus/multi-building systems, I am using a single underground main and splitting off to each building. Since you don't have to consider a multiple building fire problem, we have typically worked on the hydraulically most-remote building for underground sizing and use wall PIVs to offer individual building shutoffs, with FDCs on the individual buildings.

I'm getting challenged on "what allows this in code?" It's mostly a question of - where is the limit on how long a loop can be?

I'm looking at this from a sprinkler design perspective and whether each individual building's sprinkler system is able to perform hydraulically.

Is the limit for the length/layout/sizing of a campus underground loop simply the more demanding of Fire Flow or sprinkler system feeds?

Is there a code basis for this?

​Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

When is PIV Not Subject to Mechanical Damage?

3/8/2024

8 Comments

 
According to NFPA 13 2022 Section 16.9.8.2 it is to our discretion what we consider a location " where they are not subject to mechanical damage?

When installing a Post Indicator Valve, what do you consider "not subject to mechanical damage?"

Where is the line drawn, so to speak?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Why is Fire Pump Pulling the Underground Dry?

3/6/2024

19 Comments

 
Had a review comment come back and needed to clarify.

I have a 14-inch city main with an 8-inch tap to a backflow in a pit. It then runs to four hydrants, and then turns into the building supplying a fire pump.

The flow test at the hydrant near the tap (#1 on image below) was 49 psi static, 47 psi residual at 920 gpm.

The flow test at a hydrant nearest the building (#2 on image below) was 49 psi static, 39 psi residual at 750 gpm.
Picture
The 95 psi @ 1,500 gpm pump in the building is running the underground dry. The plot curve shows 20 psi at 2,100 gpm, however the pump rep said he barely got 500 gpm at 9 pitot and had to shut it down as the gauges went below 20 psi and air was starting to come out of the 2-1/2" hose valves.

This is a mystery to us - we have five different flow tests all ranging from 750 gpm to 1,060 gpm at 40-32 psi residual.

Why would the pump be pulling the underground so low?

They checked all the valves and rebuilt the backflow in the pit. Water meter is good as well (per the utility department). Looking for suggestions. Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
19 Comments

Can Floating Dock with Hose Valves Use PVC?

3/1/2024

13 Comments

 
Can a floating dock standpipe with hose valves in the ocean be ran with PVC pipe?

NFPA 307 doesn’t go into detail about materials used but reverts back to NFPA 20, 22 and 24. This is in Florida. The AHJ wants it full of water so I have to issues, it’s too heavy to mount on the side of the dock, it’s not very big and it will be in the water or very close with high tide, so corrosion is inevitable.

Is there anything stating Schedule 40 or 80 PVC is listed or acceptable for such use?


​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe​
13 Comments

Is SDR21 OK for Combined Domestic/Sprinkler?

2/19/2024

8 Comments

 
We have a private water main feeding a combined domestic and NFPA 13 system that was specified as C900. They installed SDR21 (6") instead.

They are using the argument that this 200 psi rated pipe will not be subject to the fire system pressure and therefore is ok.

I cannot find where this is listed for fire service mains. Any direction?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Replace Dry Barrel Hydrant with Wet Barrel?

12/25/2023

3 Comments

 
Would it be possible to replace a Kennedy K-10 dry barrel fire hydrant with a wet barrel fire hydrant if the main valve of the K-10 was left open, and a wet barrel hydrant was then bolted to the standpipe base?

We're in southern California, so we commonly have wet barrel hydrants in the area. Replacing with a wet barrel means we wouldn't have to excavate. 

The main reason I see is that the drain holes would be left open if the dry barrel main valve is removed. We have been unable to find new main valves for Kennedy K-10 hydrants. Your comments would be greatly appreciated.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Where Does NFPA 22 and NFPA 24 Start and Stop?

11/9/2023

7 Comments

 
Last week someone asked a great question about the limits of where NFPA 20 starts and stops.

In a similar vein, what are the limits of where NFPA 22 and NFPA 24 start and stop for a typical system with a water storage tank, fire pump and private mains?

We had a question at work yesterday as to whether NFPA 24 or NFPA 22 applies to pipe before a water storage tank. It'd be helpful for us to understand these limitations in addition to the conversation last week.

Thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Does a Private Fire Hydrant Require Backflow?

8/21/2023

11 Comments

 
In the NFPA series of standards, is there a requirement for a water line supplying private fire hydrants to have backflow protection?

I am working on a project where the fire marshal is requiring double check detector assemblies to be installed on six private fire hydrants. The line serving the hydrants has no other connections to it.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments

Seismic Req'd for Outside Pipe on Pipe Stands?

7/19/2023

10 Comments

 
I am running 8” and 4” water storage tank fill and suction lines above ground in an exterior utility yard. 

Is lateral and longitudinal bracing required for aboveground piping supported on pipe stands located outside of a building, in an exterior utility yard?

Due to underground conflicts with spread footing foundations the underground piping has to be routed above ground to the final location and connection points on the tank. The pipes are supported by 1’-6” non adjustable pipe stands attached to slab on grade.

This project is located in a seismic zone and the seismic force factor does not exceed 0.5Wᵖ and I am using ACI 355.2 qualified anchors as required by NFPA 13 2016 Edition. Sections 9.3.8, A9.3.8, 9.3.8.1, and 9.3.8.2. The pipe stands I am using are following the NFPA 13 2016 Edition prescriptive method detailed in sections 9.2.6.3.2, 9.2.6.4.2, 9.2.6.4.4.1, and 9.2.6.4.5.1, I’ve also attached a detail for clarification. Thanks in advance!
Picture
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Is "future use" PIV Req'd to be Open & Connected?

7/18/2023

9 Comments

 
If I have a PIV installed, is it required to be tied into a fire sprinkler system?

I work at a campus style facility with a fire water supply loop for fire sprinklers.

We have a couple of buildings that do not have a fire sprinkler system, however, there is a PIV outside the buildings that are in the closed position. I am assuming they were installed for "future use" assuming a fire sprinkler system gets installed.

Is there an NFPA code reference that requires the PIVs to be "in service" or used for their intended purpose, or are we code compliant with them being "for future use"?

I do have a concern with responding fire units incorrectly assuming that there is a fire sprinkler system in these buildings due to the PIVs being installed.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Fire Service Required to Run Underneath Footing?

7/12/2023

10 Comments

 
Are you required by NFPA 24 to enter a building underneath the foundation, or can you enter a building with the the fire service main from the side of the building?

Many are under the impression that due to the fact all illustrations in NFPA 24 show the fire main entering under the building, footing/foundation, that this suggests that it is a requirement.

Please can someone shed some light on this?

Regards.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Second Valve Required on a Fire Service Main?

6/7/2023

13 Comments

 
I'm working with a city inspector who is adamant that we add a second non-rising stem valve (NRS) in the fire sprinkler service main just before the building. The first valve being in the street at the live-tap location with the roadway box.

Is a valve required on the service main before the building?

The requested location would place the valve under the sidewalk, accessible by T-handle wrench only, prohibiting reliable supervision of any kind.

I can't seem to find any language in NFPA 24 that I can use to argue against the second unsupervised valve. I don't see any value in the position the inspector has taken and requested a copy of the city ordinance requiring the additional valve.

Installing the second valve wouldn't be a huge deal but certainly seems like an unnecessary opportunity for an unsupervised valve to get closed or fail. I would like to hear what others in this community think and if anyone has something to offer.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments

HDPE ISO 4427, PE100 SDR Allowed Without FM?

3/29/2023

7 Comments

 
Can HDPE ISO 4427, PE100 SDR 9 PE be used for underground water service pipe (dedicated for fire water), even though it carries no FM Approval?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Use Fire Pump at 145% to Avoid 8" Underground?

2/21/2023

17 Comments

 
I have question regarding fire pump capacity.

In my situation the water department is requiring a city tap size to be 2 pipe sizes larger than the fire protection backflow preventer.

In my project, I was using a 4" backflow and 400 gpm fire pump so my underground/city tap would be required to be at least 6 inches.

The AHJ is requiring me to increase the area size in one of my remote areas. So, my sprinkler demand now becomes 582 gpm. To avoid having to use a 500gpm fire pump (with a minimum suction size of 6-inch) and increase the underground to 8-inch, could I still use the 400 gpm fire pump to supply the 582 gpm demand?

This comes out to about 145% of the pumps rated capacity.

I have never come close to the 150% mark before and just want to see what others think. If the underground size wasn't required to be 2 inches larger I wouldn't even think about it and go with the 500 gpm pump.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
17 Comments
<<Previous
    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT