Have a dry manual standpipe system that is going to be retrofit along exterior stairs in the southern US. Is there any requirement that would prevent the standpipe from being interconnected underground (not under the building)?

I understand there's difficulties with drainage and access for future repairs, but as a last option is it even permissible by code? 

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe

I've heard that sprinkler frame arms are typically aligned with the pipe which they're connected. I commonly see this for uprights, but how often is this true for pendents?

 Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe

Is the discharge side of a fire pump required to step up to a larger pipe size on the discharge flange of the fire pump? Inspected a pump where there was a flowmeter welded on flanged pipe which was the same size as the discharge flange of the fire pump.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Are sprinklers required to be installed in an escalator pit? The volume is small but I understand there to be hydraulic fluids and equipment in the pit. Has anyone come across this before?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

There's many code contingencies that depend on a fully-sprinklered building. If a room within a fully-sprinklered building is protected with a clean agent system (per NFPA 2001) and sprinklers are omitted from that room, does the building still meet the criteria to be considered fully protected and qualify for the numerous code contingencies?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Interested in getting the Toolkit and access to all of our tools? Along with printable, downloadable calculators, members also have access to the Sprinkler Database and beta test the new Pump Database. 

What is your preferred software to use for sizing bracing for fire suppression systems?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

I've heard that pressure reducing valves are not recommended and should be avoided on sprinkler or standpipe systems where possible. Has anyone had any experience or insight as to why this is?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

NFPA 13 lists requirements for calculations showing that hangers must be designed to support the weight of water-filled pipe plus 250 lb (115 kg) at each point of piping support (NFPA 13 9.1.1.2 of 2016 Edition).

When are these calculations necessary?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

What sprinkler type or finish would you recommend for a highly corrosive area? In this case I'm working on a pool equipment room.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Does the "small room rule" apply to sidewall sprinklers?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

From a sprinkler contractor in the UK - We have a British Standard BS 9251 which is based (loosely) on your NFPA 13 D/R for the use in houses, flats and care homes and so on.  One area which is very grey to us and not included in the design standard is the distance from obstructions such a pendant lampshade which lower than the ceiling or a smoke detector or emergency light fitting.  

I know most contractors are using 300mm (1 ft) as a minimum from a pendant drop light fitting but then you ask them why no one can tell you.  for other obstruction such as a smoke detector many any using 4 times the depth as a method.

For beams and larger continuous obstructions, it's much easier as most just use a bean rule in EN BS 12845 (our equivalent NFPA 13).

I would be very interested in understanding the approach which you take for such things and very much looking forward to your assistance.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

A building which has an old fire alarm system is going to have its interior completely gutted (all systems, walls, everything but the structure and exterior walls are to be removed). The fire alarm system is to be demolished and replaced entirely, and the building will change to a business occupancy once complete.

Is a fire alarm system required by code to be active during the renovation?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Had a  quick question regarding design of thrust blocks for underground FDC / fire water supply.   In your experience is that design typically a civil designer’s responsibility or the responsibility of the fire sprinkler sub?

I have a project where both parties are saying they do not do this design – the sprinkler sub says their design begins at the flanges in the riser room.  I have an earthwork subcontractor doing the physical installation of the FDC and fire water pipes outside leading into the riser room. Would thrust blocking details then need to be calc’ed and detailed by the civil engineer? 

I’d appreciate knowing what your experience has been!

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

I've come across several retail projects where there will be a "closet" that is just solid shelves about 18-24 inches deep and about four or five shelves tall, with a mirror across the front that acts as a door. It's certainly possible to provide a sprinkler outside of the closet and protect to the back of the hazard, but is this approach allowed?

To me it doesn't seem practical to provide a sprinkler at the top inside this shallow unit just as we wouldn't provide a sprinkler within the inside of cabinetry. If anything, the multiple solid shelves could prevent heat from collecting at the top and water from effectively reaching the bottom, although the door could also prevent discharge from reaching the bottom. Curious how others would approach these situations.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

I've had the request multiple times from architects to provide closely spaced sprinklers near interior windows to provide the equivalent of a 1-hour wall. 

The only support I see for such an arrangement in the International Building Code or in NFPA 13 for glass is specific to the "Enclosure of Atriums," Section 404.5 (2003-2009 Editions) or 404.6 (2013-2015 Editions).

If someone is looking to provide the equivalent of a 1-hour wall, with glass, that is not a part of an atrium enclosure, then are the only options to provide rated glass or the Tyco WS Window Sprinkler?

I sense a lot of confusion on this topic from architects, whom I guess see other project arrangements and just assume they're standard closely-spaced sprinklers.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Is a sprinkler ever not required in an electrical room? We typically provide sprinklers in all electrical rooms, but are being asked specifically if we can omit one on a project.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

A foam system is being used to protect for spilled methanol within a dike of a tank 1,120 square meters (12,055 sqft). What foam proportion would be recommended?

Is there an advantage between a balance pressure pump proportioning system or an in-line balance pressure pump proportioning system?

The system is being designed under NFPA 11, 16, and 30.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

If a glass face of a shower door goes up adjacent to the ceiling (and the bathroom is not excluded from sprinkler protection based on size) then would the shower itself need sprinkler protection?

Based on the proximity of the shower's glass door to the ceiling it looks like it would be a floor mounted obstruction, per NFPA 13.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

Have a project that requires the sprinkler system to be zoned by the areas with active smoke control. Each floor of the highrise is approximately 12,000 sqft is to be divided into two zones. I intend to have multiple floor control risers (valve, check valve, flow switch, pressure gauge, inspector's test & drain) for each smoke control zone. Is there any less costly way of accomplishing this?

It has been suggested that multiple flow switches can be placed on the same system with different retard settings so that the fire alarm system can identify where the water is flowing, but I don't have experience with this option.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

It's close to the end of the year and for some states that means making sure continuing education credits are all wrapped up. Where do you find good continuing education for fire protection?

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.

I have a question regarding performing or checking hydraulic calcs for a pressure tank supplied system in a retrofit application.

As an example, suppose our system is located 5 floors below the existing pressure tank for a high rise building in New York City (NYC). The tank was designed and installed under prior codes and utilized the pipe schedule methods. We may have 2 tanks connected that are 9,000 total gallons capacity each with 1/3 air and 2/3 water pressurized at 75 psi (the initial pressure) at the tank.

Our connection to the sprinkler riser being 5 floors down now has 75 psi plus the pressure gained by gravity (5 psi per floor typical NYC arrangement) equaling 100 psi static available.

The jurisdiction now requires all systems to be hydraulically calculated. The calculation are done to the point of connection to the riser and not all the way back to the water source (NYC quirk) and no hose demand.

The contractor provides a calculation stating that the system demand is below the 100 psi (95 psi residual) and less than 400 gpm (light hazard occupancy 30 minute supply), and claims it works. We’ve argued that as the tank drains, the air-to-water ratio changes, therefore the pressure available at the end of the 30 minutes is not the same as initial tank pressure.

Using the formula given in the Annex of NFPA 13, we can solve for what a system demand should be given the existing initial conditions of the tank plus the pressure gained by gravity and say that as long as the calculated system is less than that pressure, the system is acceptable. But is that a correct assumption?

I want to give them all the correct procedure, methodology and theories behind this subject.

Posted anonymously by a member for discussion. Discuss this | Subscribe.