MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Exterior Wall of Fire Pump Room Require Rating?

7/20/2023

11 Comments

 
Architect here with a fire code question. We have a fully sprinklered building (ESFR), of Type II-B, tilt concrete construction.

The fire pump room is located on an exterior wall, and the only door into the pump room is from the exterior. We have 1-hr rated construction separating the fire pump room from the rest of the building.

The fire marshal is telling us that the exterior wall and door also have to be rated. I responded by pointing out the fire pump is required to be protected from the surrounding building, and that it does not need to be protected from the exterior, so exterior wall and door should not have to be rated.

Fire marshal disagrees and pointed to NFPA 20 4.14.1.1.2. That section does not specifically state that separation is required from the rest of the building, although Section 4.14.1.1.1 right before it does make that distinction, just like IBC/IFC do.

We have solid concrete walls that are inherently fire rated construction, so typically I would just say ok and label them rated. The issue is we are required to have ventilation in the pump room per NFPA 20, so we have a makeup air louver in the exterior wall. If we rate the wall, then my understanding is we will have to put a fire/smoke damper on that louver, which is added cost and unnecessary in my opinion.

Is your understanding that all walls have to be rated as the fire marshal is saying, or just the walls between pump room and rest of building?

I've done many buildings of this type in multiple states and this is the first time I've been told this. I'd appreciate your insight, thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Anthony
7/20/2023 07:28:09 am

TL;DR: Its reasonable for a fire official to intemperate table 4.14.1.1.2 as the full pump house connected to the building.

4.14.1.1.1 - is directly related to high rises, if you have a high rise this piece of code calls for a 2 hour rated wall.

if you don't have a high rise the room shall be "protected by fire-rated construction in accordance with table 4.14.1.1.2." To get my grammar lawyer hat on it is reasonable to conclude form this code that the construction is an encompassing term requiring all parts of a bulling, i.e the totality (walls and roof) of construction shall be in accordance with the table.

4.14.1.1.3 and its annex A material indicated this section should be referenced only for individual special hazards such as a local mist system inside an otherwise fully sprinkled building.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
7/20/2023 08:26:07 am

The Exterior Wall (EW) of the Fire Pump Room (FPR) is not required to have a fire-resistance rating (FRR) per the scoping Code (e.g. 2021 IBC).

The IBC requires the FPR to be "separated from all other areas of the building by 2-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or 2-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711, or both." Since this building (non High Rise Building) is protected by an Automatic Sprinkler System (ASPS), the FRR of the Fire Barriers (FB) can be reduced from 2-Hours to 1-Hour.

This section specifically states "separated from all other areas of the building" and not "separation from the exterior." That is not the intent of this separation requirement.

If the AHJ disagrees and insists (incorrectly) that the EW is required to have a 1-Hour FRR, acquiesce accordingly. The corresponding exterior door will be required to be 0.75-Hours. Openings (e.g mechanical louver) in the 1-Hour EW would not require a damper, however.

2021 IBC
Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems
Section 913 Fire Pumps
913.1 General
Where provided, fire pumps for fire protection systems shall be installed in accordance with this section and NFPA 20.
Exception: Pumps for automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.3, or Section P2904 of the International Residential Code.
913.2 Protection Against Interruption of Service
The fire pump, driver and controller shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 20 against possible interruption of service through damage caused by explosion, fire, flood, earthquake, rodents, insects, windstorm, freezing, vandalism and other adverse conditions.
913.2.1 Protection of Fire Pump Rooms
Fire pumps shall be located in rooms that are separated from all other areas of the building by 2-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or 2-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711, or both.
Exceptions:
1. In other than high-rise buildings, separation by 1-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or 1-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711, or both, shall be permitted in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
2. Separation is not required for fire pumps physically separated in accordance with NFPA 20.

Reply
Dan Wilder
7/20/2023 08:34:57 am

Not an IBC guy but....

IBC 2018
913.2.1 Protection - 1 HR per Section 707
707.4 - Sends you to 705 but says the fire-resistance-rated enclosure or separation requirements shall not apply (with the exception noted).
705.5 - Per Table 601 & 602
Table 601 - Type II-B Lists "0" all the way down unless it's non-bearing then look at 602
Table 602 - If you have 30' clear, no rating requirements.

Not sure of the Occupancy Group but S-1 & S-2 both allow a "0" rating down to 10' of fire separation. Group H is the only one that would need the full 30'.

Now, I may be looking at this wrong, so I'm open to some learning because I can see this being helpful in the future.

Reply
Scott Keeley
7/20/2023 08:45:01 am

As an AHJ, he is misinterpreting this section of the code. The exterior wall is not required to be rated. You could always file an appeal and take before the AHJ's construction and appeals board.

Reply
Glenn Berger
7/20/2023 08:53:55 am

From what you have said, you should be good from your building. You have not made any discussions on the surrounding buildings or other external equipment, for which protection may be required.

Reply
Jesse
7/20/2023 09:55:17 am

I'm gonna jump in with Glenn here. Is there an exterior exposure involved? Yard storage, Wildland-urban interface, exposing buildings with no adequate clear space separation?

Reply
CJ
7/20/2023 09:07:51 am

I think that Todd briefly touched on the most helpful fact above… even if the exterior wall was rated, the louver would not require a fire damper (unless it’s right next to a means of egress). If the mechanical engineer says otherwise, let me know and I can dig out the codes sections.

Reply
Franck
7/20/2023 09:42:44 am

Unless you have idle pallets (or other combustible load or building) close to the exterior wall, I don’t see any reason for fire rating requirements.
Pump room should be sprinkler protected as per last versions of NFPA 20 (so no exposure to the outside), and if no outside exposure…

Reply
Sean
7/20/2023 11:00:54 am

I think the NFPA 20 is pretty clear. 4.14.1.1.2 says "protected by fire rated construction", but Table 4.14.1.1.2 is specific in saying that the fire separation is required between the protected building and the pump room. The exterior is not part of the building, so no separation is required. Handbook commentary in the 2022 edition also clarifies this.

Similarly in IBC/IFC - 913.2.1 says rooms shall be separated from all other areas of the building. Exterior is not part of the building.

The only thing I can think of that would require rating would be if all exterior walls needed to be rated for exposure protection due to closely adjacent buildings, or if 2 close buildings are not separated and considered a single building where there is no public way; but assuming that is not the case here.

Reply
JP link
7/20/2023 01:38:07 pm

I will add in from a building code perspective since most others discussed the NFPA standards. In general, exterior wall ratings and allowances for openings originate from Table 601 and Section 705 from the IBC. These requirements stem from construction type and fire separation distance. The vent for the exterior wall could fall under the requirements of Section 705 for unprotected openings. If the other advice is not working, this may be an alternative solution by stating what your allowance is for unprotected openings for that wall based on fire separation distance.

Reply
Janak Patel
7/26/2023 12:01:09 pm

Per NFPA 20 (2019), Table 4.14.1.1.2, a fully sprinklered Pump Room separate from a fully sprinklered building (non-high rise), the exterior walls need to be at least 1 hour fire rated or 50 ft separated.
IBC (2018), Section 913.2.1, Exception 1 requires a 1-hr fire rated wall construction or a 'physical' separation per NFPA 20 (i.e. 50 ft).

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT