Has anyone seen the International Fire Code Chapters 53 and 58 applied to natural gas installations in addition to the Fuel Gas Code?
IFC Chapter 53 is Compressed Gasses and Chapter 58 is Flammable Gasses. It's technically a gas at standard temperature and pressure with a boiling point below 68 deg F at 14.7 psi and flammable range of 5% to 17% by volume in air. Natural gas appears to be subject to these requirements, but I've never seen it this way in practice. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments
Recently had a job with a wet-pipe fire sprinkler system (smaller project) that has a 6-inch double check backflow. The area static and residual pressures are pretty consistent (had a flow test of ~40 psi static and ~38 psi residual at 1,300 gpm).
We ran a forward-flow test through the backflow preventer, needing a minimum flow of about 800 gpm, which includes the hose allowances for the project (no standpipes or interior hose connections). The most flow we could get was about 450 gpm, even with three 2-1/2" hose outlets completely wide open. The static pressure following the test at the riser was about 40 psi. We used three 100 ft, 2-1/2" hoses with a 1-3/4" smooth nozzle and diffusers at the end of each hose, measuring about 3 psi pitot on each and full flow (which equates to roughly 450 gpm). Do you have any tips or advice in why we were not able to get enough flow through the backflow, or where to start to troubleshoot? Thanks in advance! Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Is it possible to make a 60-degree angle to a main pipe using grooved pipe and fittings?
If I'm correct there is only 90-degree, 45-degree, and 11.5 degree angles normally available. If a 60-degree angle is impossible, is there a way to use welded parts to make this angle happen? What's my best option here? Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Last week was week sixteen of our 2020 PE Prep Series - it's 20-weeks worth of mini Fire Protection PE Exams. Week 17, #1 had a question that required calculation of an effective heat transfer coefficient. Technically this doesn't show up in any reference material, so points were rewarded to each examinee on this question. It's been revised for future versions. Each week we'll post the leaderboard here with the results of that week's exams. To see full leadership board and more details, visit the PE Prep Series page here The Leaderboard lists the top total scores for the most recent three weekly exams for PE Prep Series participants. See the entire scoreboard here. Want to join in? It's not too late - the PE Prep Series is the ultimate PE Prep tool. It's a series of 1-hour, 10-question simulated PE Exams offered weekly with solutions immediately following each exam. Learn more here. Every week of the series is retroactive so you can still test yourself with past week exams.
How do I properly perform hydraulic calculations for a sprinkler system with two water sources?
The system we have is supplied by two independent street mains. Each service has a slightly different static and residual pressure. The calculations need to show both supplies. Thanks in advance. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe We have a closed ammonia refrigeration system for a large cooler/freezer. The refrigeration equipment is located in a separate mechanical room. Total amount of ammonia is less than 10,000 lbs.
My question is explosion control per Section 911 of the International Fire Code required for the refrigeration mechanical room? I am reading different interpretations on whether ammonia is considered a flammable gas, most say it is technically not a flammable gas but can burn and/or explode. I'm interested in hearing everyone's take. Thanks. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe I'm an AHJ and I know many plan reviewers and inspectors in my area are new to the trade.
Does anyone have recommendation(s) for good plan review checklists or tools for plan review that would be helpful to rookie and intermediate-level plan reviewers? Thanks in advance. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe What is the average life expectancy of a wet and dry fire sprinkler system?
Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe NFPA 22, 2018 Edition regarding filling requirement and duration -
Section 4.2.1.4. states "The water supply shall be capable of filling the minimum required fire protection volume within the tank in a maximum of 8 hours" and at the same time Section 14.4.3 states "The tank shall be kept filled, and the water level shall never be more than 4 in. (102 mm) below the designated fire service level." If I understand correctly, as soon as the water goes below 4-inches from the normal filled level in the tank (HHL), the makeup water supply should be starting to replenish and the pipe sizes should be provided in such a way that the tank can be filled within 8-hours. In a fire, as the water is going down, the tank will always start full. What is the case where the tank would be emptied out (except maintenance) and need to be refilled within 8-hours? What if we store water in two tanks to allow maintenance - would we not need to meet this 8-hour requirement? I'm unsure of how these two requirements work together. Appreciate any feedback. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Last week was week sixteen of our 2020 PE Prep Series - it's 20-weeks worth of mini Fire Protection PE Exams. Each week we'll post the leaderboard here with the results of that week's exams. To see full leadership board and more details, visit the PE Prep Series page here he Leaderboard lists the top total scores for the most recent three weekly exams for PE Prep Series participants. See the entire scoreboard here. Want to join in? It's not too late - the PE Prep Series is the ultimate PE Prep tool. It's a series of 1-hour, 10-question simulated PE Exams offered weekly with solutions immediately following each exam. Learn more here. Every week of the series is retroactive so you can still test yourself with past week exams.
I have a job where there are two existing diesel fire pumps that serve an existing warehouse (2 million sq. ft +).
The building is surrounded by an existing 12" underground fire supply loop. The two diesel pumps serve the space. According to the property manager the system operate as follows: (1) Pressure is maintained at 160-175 psi. (2) Below 160 psi the jockey pump turns on to maintain 160-175 psi. (3) Fire Pump #1 turns on when pressure drops below 150 psi to maintain 175 PSI. (Fire Pump - Static: 165 PSI ; Residual: 134 PSI @ 2000 gpm). (4) Fire Pump #2 turns on when pressure drops below 140 psi to maintain 175 PSI (Fire Pump - Static: 190 PSI; Residual: 174 PSI @ 2000 gpm). The pumps are provided by a municipal supply and a back-up private lake dedicated for the fire service. The pumps are in parallel, so you would add the flows. And to my knowledge the higher pressure would overtake the smaller pressure. My question is, how do you determine how to calculate the system hydraulically? If I only use fire pump #1 for water supply, it will not be an accurate representation on how the system operates. In this case it also is very difficult to get the system to work hydraulically off of one fire pump. I appreciate any input! Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe We have scenario where we are using foam system under NFPA 11 for a floating roof tank with Crude Oil.
Based on our previous calculation for a prior tank the fire water demand is 1,926 gpm so we have existing 2,000 gpm pump to be able to supply the required flow. But an additional Crude Oil tank has been added and we have run our new hydraulic calculations and we come up with 4,496 gpm new flow requirement. Is there a way we can still use the existing fire pump? Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe We have an outdoor wooden canopy overhanging over a building entrance with the following dimensions: 45'-6" x 13'-0". The canopy has an existing wet pipe sprinkler system utilizing water/glycol mix. The building is in an area where winter temperatures can go below 0 deg F (-18 deg C).
Given the new NFPA requirement of reduced glycol mix ratio and hence the existing sprinkler system is no longer compliant with NFPA and requires to be replaced. My question is, is it feasible and compliant to have the wooden canopy treated with fire retardant NFPA 703 approved coating/painting and hence the canopy can be considered non-combustible or at least limited-combustible eliminating the requirement to install a sprinkler system under NFPA 13 section 9.2.3? I appreciate your feedback. Thanks Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Working with a 10,500 square foot building that is primarily a wood shop (as the AHJ, fire official). In this building they basically saw cut raw lumber on a large gasoline powered (vented) saw mill inside of the building (this is an issue I question as well). This is a two-part question, at the least!
The occupants claim they are a E occupancy (based on the 2012 IBC/IFC) and that they fall under the 12,000 square feet for automatic fire sprinkler requirements in chapter 9. I look at this as a woodworking facility over 2,500 square feet per 903.2.4.1, that would require automatic fire sprinklers. The organization is not a school, but rather consider themselves as a vocational school that serves students working on their G.E.D. along with troubled students needing extra guidance, and they pay these students. They teach life/work skills and help with job placement. I feel this would either fall under a B-Occupancy for training and skill development not within a school or academic program, or an F-1. Thoughts on this part? Next, even if we would call this an E-Occupancy, would sprinklers be required since it is under the 12,000 square feet? I would think yes because of section 903.2.4.1, however the organization says no because they believe they are an E. I know where I am leaning on this issue, but would welcome any other input. I am all about helping this organization out, but also need to take safety and property preservation into account. This place keeps me up at night with all of the students and hazards present. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe NFPA 72 requires a battery test be run including removal of the main power supply, waiting the full-length standby time, then activating the fire alarm system for the full alarm time. After the alarm time, the battery voltage is required to be tested.
What is the pass/fail mark for the battery voltage? In theory, if the battery output still has 20.4 V, then the last appliance on a NAC circuit would still get a minimum of 16 V and everything still functions correctly. I just can't seem to find a code reference whether 20.4 V is the correct voltage to use (where a voltage reading below 20.4 V fails the battery). Thanks in advance. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe This week is the fifteen of our 2020 PE Prep Series - it's 20-weeks worth of mini Fire Protection PE Exams. We did have one correction to update with Week 15 - a question mentioned FM-200 but then referenced HFC-125 in the solution. Those who scored it correctly were given credit and the question and solution where updated mid-week. You may not have noticed it if you took the exam later in the week as we corrected the solution mid-week. Those who scored it incorrectly from the prior bad solution were given credit. Each week we'll post the leaderboard here with the results of that week's exams. To see full leadership board and more details, visit the PE Prep Series page here The Leaderboard lists the top total scores for the most recent three weekly exams for PE Prep Series participants. See the entire scoreboard here. Want to join in? It's not too late - the PE Prep Series is the ultimate PE Prep tool. It's a series of 1-hour, 10-question simulated PE Exams offered weekly with solutions immediately following each exam. Learn more here. Every week of the series is retroactive so you can still test yourself with past week exams.
In an existing building utilizing a “booster pump” or unlisted fire pump for a standpipe or sprinkler system, is there a suggested annual flow test procedure?
I realize there is no manufacturer’s data (0%,100%,150% rated capacity) to compare the results against. Should it be excluded from the annual flow test requirements, and just flowed during the 5 year roof top flow? I would appreciate input as well as, what others in the industry are doing to address this fairly common scenario. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Does anyone have experience with a specific fire extinguisher for fires involving platinum catalysts? I know this would generally fall under the Class D type of extinguishers but was wondering if there is a platinum specific extinguisher like there is for lithium fires (lith-x brand). Also, if you do have experience is there any difference in operation besides a regular extinguisher (for example how the agent is propelled)?
Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe In an NFPA 13R system does the FDC check valve need to be accessible?
In 13 it states it is required, but I can't find it in NFPA 13R. Section 6.11.4 talks about ball drip for check valve, but I do not see anything on accessible. I’m sure I’m missing some code path that references 13 possibly? Thanks. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe This week is the fourteen of our 2020 PE Prep Series - it's 20-weeks worth of mini Fire Protection PE Exams. We did have one correction to update with Week 14 - Question 1 had a Mean Velocity of Plume that should have a coefficient of 1.03 from NCEES 3.4.7. You may not have noticed it if you took the exam later in the week as we corrected the solution mid-week. Those who scored it incorrectly from the prior bad solution were given credit. Each week we'll post the leaderboard here with the results of that week's exams. To see full leadership board and more details, visit the PE Prep Series page here The Leaderboard lists the top total scores for the most recent three weekly exams for PE Prep Series participants. See the entire scoreboard here. Want to join in? It's not too late - the PE Prep Series is the ultimate PE Prep tool. It's a series of 1-hour, 10-question simulated PE Exams offered weekly with solutions immediately following each exam. Learn more here. Every week of the series is retroactive so you can still test yourself with past week exams.
We have a bowling alley that has bowling lanes constructed of wood, with supporting solid-wood members underneath. The bottom of the solid-wood support members are about 1-ft above the top of any other obstructions at the bottom of this concealed space, leaving a total height of roughly 2-ft below the lanes. This whole bowling alley (30+ lanes) is being retrofitted with sprinklers.
Are sprinklers usually provided underneath the lanes for areas like this? If so, how do we address inspection and draining from these areas below the floor level? Thanks in advance. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe I am a municipal fire inspector. We have a new high school, fully sprinklered, that has residential stoves in a classroom. These are protected with UL300A hoods.
Are these hoods required to be connected to the fire alarm? Common sense would indicate that if there was a fire hot enough to release the UL300A system, that the building occupants could be in danger and the fire alarms should activate, however, I cannot find a code reference for this. The architect is saying the stoves are residential so only residential requirements apply. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Is there a standard spacing for private fire hydrants?
No applicable code for this project, but looking for guidance in what would be common under NFPA 24, NFPA 1 / 101, and/or the IBC. Thanks in advance. Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe A building owner has an existing mixed-use building which has approximately 6,000 sqft of storage space (S-1 Occupancy) and offices (larger than 6,000 sqft). The offices and storage appear to have a rated separation (steel studs, 2x gypsum on at least one side of the wall) in-between them.
The owner is looking to store new product in the warehouse, but would like for it to be sprinkler protected. This building, if new, would be under the 2015 International Building Code. As the building currently stands, it is a code-compliant mixed-use separated, non-sprinklered occupancy. Can the owner voluntarily provide a sprinkler system above code, but only for the warehouse portion? If so, does anything with the fire barrier between the warehouse and office need to change? As this is only a voluntary improvement to the property and life safety systems, I could see it being an alternative design method and seek approval from the AHJ under IBC Section 104.11 as a partially-protected building - I just wasn't sure if it even needed to come to that. Would be interested in other opinions, thank you in advance! Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe I have a residential sprinkler calculation out of NFPA 13R 2016.
Do you need to calculate a minimum of 4 residential sprinklers within the dwelling unit? I have a two-bedroom apartment unit and my most demanding area would be the two that are in the bedrooms and the two that are in the kitchen/living area. Can I consider the kitchen/living area a compartment separate from the bedrooms and calculate only these two sprinklers? Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Feb '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
March 2025
PE PREP SERIES |