MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinklers for Noncombustible Mech. Platform?

7/31/2024

17 Comments

 
To what extent are sprinklers required for an above-ceiling mechanical platform in noncombustible construction?

​See the building section attached. In this case, the platform is nearly the full length of a classroom building.
Picture
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
17 Comments

Sloped 13D Require 1,950 sqft or 2-Sprinkler Calc?

7/30/2024

6 Comments

 
For a single-family home with a 6 in 12 sloped ceiling (roof) that is a combustible wood structure.

Does this need a 1,950 sqft calculation due to the slope, or just two sprinklers as NFPA 13D requires?

Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

1-hour Req'd Between Riser Room & Townhouses?

7/29/2024

8 Comments

 
Imagine you have a 6-unit, true townhouse-construction building covered by the 2018 IRC under construction. It has an NFPA 13D sprinkler and a one-hour separation between units, but​ there is one common closet for the sprinkler riser and domestic water main. This closet is accessed only through a door on the exterior and is under the control of the landlord, not the tenant.

What is the code path to require any fire separation between that closet and the dwelling units?

There is no dog house off the side. The IRC only seems to call out separation between units, and even if you go into the IBC, it is not apparent.

Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

How to Meet 520 Hz Multi-Station Smoke Alarm?

7/26/2024

17 Comments

 
How have people been addressing the IFC (2021) Section 907.5.2.1.3.2 requiring 520Hz single/multiple station smoke alarms in residential units being addressed?

It sounds like there are no 520 Hz smoke alarms available on the on the market meet these requirements. We have a roughly 300-unit building and the AHJ is pushing us to put smoke detectors with sounder bases in each unit instead of 120v smoke alarms.

​We know this could be done, but the cost impacts would be substantial and the future maintenance and inspections in the building would be very difficult.

This is the first time we've seen this be pushed by an AHJ, so looking for information on how others have handled this.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
17 Comments

How to Get Zone Data from Multiple FA Vendors?

7/25/2024

7 Comments

 
We were looking to tie multiple fire alarm systems together from various vendors such as Honeywell, Siemens, Notifier, intermesh, etc. The end goal is to bring all the zone data for a building to a Siemens Desigo Fire Server.

Currently, the
Monitoring-Only Solution Assembly (MOSA) ring will not accommodate the Honeywell, Notifier, or other non-Siemens panels to bring in a complete data stream in. We are limited to the standard supervisory signals for trouble, alarm, duct detectors, pull station, and smoke detectors as a limited set of data.

Does anyone have an interface that would bring
multiple data points from other vendors' fire alarm panels to the Desigo front-end?

Siemens and Honeywell do not support each other’s components. The MOSA ring is a Siemens product. A 3rd party would be required to facilitate the interface panel.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Tank Sizing: Where to Add Hose Allowance?

7/24/2024

7 Comments

 
If the system demand is 321.5 gpm for an Ordinary Hazard Group 2 system, do you add the 250 gpm hose allowance before or after calculating the 90-minute supply?

For example, 321.5 gpm + 250 gpm = 571.5 gpm x 90 minutes = 51,435 gallons, or, 321.5 gpm x 90 min + 250 gal = 29,185 gallons.

Looking for input to order a water storage tank and the owner is disputing the water storage tank size. We told them we would need a 52,000 gallon tank.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

NFPA 13R in 4-Story Residential + 1-Story Garage?

7/23/2024

9 Comments

 
I have a 5-story building going up with 4-story residential over 1-story parking.

Can the residential portion be NFPA 13R?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Can Buildings Share Fire Alarm, Sprinkler System?

7/22/2024

9 Comments

 
Can we connect 2 or three buildings to the same fire alarm system? What about sprinkler?

What code basis (IBC or NFPA 13/72) would allow or disallow multiple buildings on the same system?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Do Multiple Small AHUs Require Duct Detectors?

7/19/2024

5 Comments

 
If you have an open office area with (2) AHUs, each AHU supply fan provides 1,500 cfm of supply air and return air that is fully ducted and has no common plenum.

Would duct detectors be provided on the supply side of each AHU?

Do you combine the "CFM" since both units serve the same area?

If not, would you ever cumulatively add multiple units of CFM?

This has been an ongoing question as each of our AHJs sees it differently.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

Calc Backflow Retrofit for Pipe Schedule System?

7/18/2024

9 Comments

 
When retroactively adding a Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) to an existing system, we need to verify that the new DCVA does not adversely affect the system's performance.

If no significant adjustments are required, I usually use the hydraulic placard information and compare it to a new hydrant test to determine the system's available pressure. I then subtract the pressure loss from the DCVA at the flow rate indicated on the placard.

How do people deal with adding a DCVA to a pipe schedule system with no existing documentation?

Thanks in advance!


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

A Separate Second Storage Tank for Firefighting?

7/17/2024

5 Comments

 
Suppose on-site water storage for firefighting is required, and an existing tank is on-site sized for the existing building.

Can I add a second tank on site (not connected to the first tank) and just size it for the additional water required for the second building?

Ex.
A larger building requires a 10,000-gallon tank, while a smaller building requires a 5,000-gallon tank. Can I just install one new 5,000-gallon tank (10,000-5,000 = 5,000 gallons)?

Or would the tanks need to be connected so there is no shortage of water?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

When is an Alarm Check Valve Required?

7/16/2024

9 Comments

 
Is an alarm check valve required in a sprinkler system?

Is there an alternative to an alarm check valve?

Are there any restrictions on where the alarm check valve is required to be (i.e., inside or outside of a fire pump room)?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Foam Req'd for Diesel Generator Inside Building?

7/15/2024

8 Comments

 
The hot topic of AFFFs and PFOS. Where is the requirement stating foam must be used for fire protection for a diesel generator inside a building?

We're looking to eliminate the need for foam instead of replacing it with "fluorine" free foam.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

NFPA 13 Simplified Method vs. Dynamic in ASCE 7?

7/12/2024

3 Comments

 
I am designing the sprinklers for a building with unusual seismic criteria (it's designed to be seismically resilient and "floats" on seismic isolators).

The structural drawings note that design should be in accordance with ASCE 7-16 equation 13.3-4:
Fp = ai ap Wp Ax / (Rp / Ip)

I see from NFPA 13 (2022) appendix E that the simplified method is based on ASCE 7-16 equation 13.3-1.

​Do you think the NFPA 13 simplified bracing method can still be applied/adapted to this alternate equation (without hiring a structural engineer)?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Company License to Perform Testing, Inspection?

7/11/2024

10 Comments

 
Can a company who is licensed in the installation of fire sprinkler systems perform the acceptance testing of the system or does that company need to be licensed to perform testing and inspections?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Different ESFR K-Factors at Offset Roof Heights?

7/10/2024

10 Comments

 
Can ESFR K-Factors be different within the same area, just at different roof elevations?

The roof elevations here are dictating different design requirements.
Picture
We have multiple ESFR sprinkler systems throughout a new building. The building has two different roof elevations, 38'-4" for the majority of the building, 43'-4" on remainder. We're under NFPA 13-2019 Edition.

The Contractor is wanting to use K-16.8 pendents at 52 psi at the low roof. K-25.2 at 40 psi at the high roof.

One sprinkler system will cover the area where the roof steps, with two design areas (high/low roof). The outer thirds of the building separating the roof elevations will have full height concrete tilt-up walls. The center third only has a large open girder truss, with nothing stopping heat from traveling between the low and high roof.

Section 7.2.2.6 says ESFR K-factor shall be selected for appropriate hazard. Sections 20.6.2.6 & 23.6.2 indicate ESFR shall be based on building height (amongst other things). Section 23.1.2 for Draft curtains, only reference the adjacent system with standard response sprinklers, not ESFR with different K factors.

Section 27.2.4.9.2 says K-factors can't be mixed "for the purpose of minimizing sprinkler over discharge" (consolidated), which is not the case in this scenario. The Roof elevations are dictating the different design requirements.

The K-25.2 sprinklers could be used throughout, but the low roof would only require 25 psi and the high roof 40 psi. However, there is a large cost savings going with the K-16.8 sprinkler for the majority of the building, along with additional storage allowance of exposed nonexpanded plastics.

My thinking says that there should be some kind of draft stop at the girder truss/roof step to collect the heat, separating the two K-factor/roof elevations, but I am not finding a code reference that dictates it. Any input will help.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

Eccentric Reducer Position when Fed from Above?

7/9/2024

10 Comments

 
NFPA 20 is pretty clear on the orientation of the eccentric reducer on the suction (upstream) side of a fire pump.

But the diagrams seem to suggest that the diagonal slope (not the flat side) of the eccentric reducer is always on the bottom.

Is this true even when the supply is being fed from above?

For instance, we often have a stub into a fire pump room from the floor, then a vertical backflow preventer, then the feed comes vertically-down and to the fire pump.

Which way is correct for the eccentric reducer when the feed is from above?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments

NFPA 13R OK in Obstructed Combustible Constr.?

7/8/2024

13 Comments

 
I have an old existing 3 story building with a basement that is being converted into an apartment building. It used to be a small paint factory.

The architect is calling for a NFPA 13R system, which is understandable since it has all the qualifications for 13R.

However, about 90% of the building is exposed 2x12 construction sitting on 10x14 wood beams. The only areas designated to get ceilings are the bathrooms and some kitchen soffits. That leaves most of the building having obstructed combustible construction, which creates a whole series of problems.

First, I cannot find any residential sprinklers listed for installation below this type of construction. A smooth, flat or sloped ceiling is required for all of them. The AHJ is using the 2019 version of 13R, and Section 6.2.1.3 allows the use of QR sprinklers in dwelling units, but only if there are no more than four sprinklers in the dwelling unit.

All of the dwelling units require more than four sprinklers, so it seems to be that I cannot use 13R at all?

​Could someone please tell me if I am interpreting and applying these code sections correctly?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments

Elevator Hoistway Be a 'Convenience Opening'?

7/5/2024

3 Comments

 
Can an elevator hoistway connecting two adjacent stories be considered a "convenience opening" and avoid a fire resistance rating altogether based on NFPA 5000?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Mass Notification Need Smoke Detector at Panel?

7/4/2024

6 Comments

 
Does a standalone mass notification system (MNS) require a smoke detector in front of the panel for a drug reduction facility?

The facility is 2,100 sqft and houses a minimum of 11 persons. Basically a drug testing and counseling facility. No Fire Alarm required for the building; being governed by UFC 3-600-01 for the US Air Force.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Fire Pump Flow for Manual Standpipes, Sprinkler?

7/3/2024

9 Comments

 
We have a low-rise building with a manual wet standpipe and a sprinkler system. One combination riser is 6-inch and the other is 4-inch. Standpipes will be Class I.

The calculated sprinkler demand is 195 gpm (Light Hazard). 

My total manual wet standpipe system demand will be 750 gpm (500 gpm first riser + 250 gpm second riser).

Does my fire pump need to accommodate the 750 gpm of the manual standpipe system, since they're interconnected?

I know the fire department will handle the standpipe demand, but does the flow rating for the fire pump need to accommodate 750 gpm?

I've searched but haven't found specific code references in NFPA 13 or 20 to address this sizing. Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Thanks to Top Contributors for June 2024!

7/2/2024

 
Shoutout to another great month of collaboration here on the Forum. Here's our Top Contributors for June:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Type of Sprinkler System for Group III Hangar?

7/2/2024

6 Comments

 
We have a airplane hangar that is over the 2,000 sqft threshold for a residential hangar, which makes it a Group III Hangar.

I'm having a hard time determining what fire suppression system would be necessary - would it be an NFPA 13 system?

It's not really clear in NFPA 409. Thanks for any help. 


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

When Does Exterior Pipe Rust Get a Red Tag?

7/1/2024

3 Comments

 
When should a red tag be issued for exterior rust on a sprinkler system?

The rust has heavy flaking especially around the weld-o-lets. NFPA 25 leaves a vague interpretation and I just need something a little more concrete to make sure we are covering ourselves. Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments
    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Oct '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT