MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Use Sprinklers at Window Instead of 1-Hr Glazing?

1/15/2024

12 Comments

 
I have a project in the Miami area where there are some exterior glass panels that need to be 1-hour fire rated.

I specified the glass to be fire rated type, but it prices are coming back too high. The contractor is looking into an alternative of providing fire sprinkler protection on the inside face of the glass.

Is this a feasible idea?

The wall that the glass is part of requires the rating due to its being within 10' of some adjacent exterior glass.

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
Pete H
1/15/2024 06:36:09 am

Based on this handy dandy Meyer Fire write up, there's definitely some things that can be done, especially with Tyco WS sprinklers:

https://www.meyerfire.com/blog/windows-sprinklers-fire-ratings-part-i

Check it out, read the pdf. It's worth it.

Reply
Dan Wilder
1/15/2024 07:05:35 am

If this is acting as an exposure type system with sprinklers on the exterior to protect your building from the adjacent building (possibly unsprinklered or already has the rated glass), you're looking at a deluge system. If it's just a separation between two sprinklered buildings, you can likely get the AHJ to approve interior closed WS on your building only. If it's the same building with some large architectural inset(s), interior sprinklers should be acceptable as well.

All 3 MFG's have options (no particular order):

Reliable - https://www.reliablesprinkler.com/featured-solutions/window-protection-sprinklers/

Tyco - https://www.tyco-fire.com/products-and-solutions/sprinklers-nozzles-and-accessories/special-application/cws-ws_fis/models-cws-and-ws-sprinklers

Viking - https://www.vikinggroupinc.com/products/window-sprinklers/vk960-vk962-pendent-vertical-sidewall-and-horizontal-sidewall-specific

Reply
DE
1/15/2024 08:08:11 am

Exactly what Dan said. Make sure the glazing & mullions conform to the WS requirements if you go that route.. there's quite a few. Check the data sheets.

Reply
Jim Stever
1/15/2024 08:08:08 am

Agree with above comments. However, what happens when the fire sprinkler system is down. I would still use rated glazing

Reply
Glenn Berger
1/15/2024 08:54:40 am

Dan laid out the thought process exactly correct. Depending on the occupancies and the hazards that are present will advise which is the right way to go.

Reply
Matthew Signes
1/15/2024 08:55:04 am

Victaulic also has a Specific Application Window Sprinkler solution.

https://www.victaulic.com/products/firelock-series-fl-sa-ws-sprinklers/

Reply
Dan Wilder
1/15/2024 04:11:07 pm

Good call....haven't tried them!

Reply
Jesse
1/15/2024 10:09:52 am

Yep, we've encountered this on numerous projects due to the price of rated glass. There are numerous window protection sprinklers on the market. Just make sure the sprinkler you choose is listed for such use.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
1/15/2024 12:55:56 pm

Agree with Dan. Make sure that you follow the listing of the head and/or if using SS heads (when allowed by applicable codes, AHJ, etc) follow IBC/IFC and NFPA 13 standard.

Typically the sprinklers cannot be used for operable doors or windows, load bearing walls, or when horizontal mullions are present that protrude out from glazing. Butt type is okay. Also, there is a maximum vertical distance for protection.

Keep in mind that the WS heads from Tyco (and others I believe) must have the deflector down at the top of the glazing. I believe Reliable has a concealed version that works pretty well if coordinated with an architectural feature like a soffit.

The fire rated glazing is expensive, but I've had several projects where the architect wished they would have went that route after they find out they can't use the WS heads because it's outside the listing and/or the install ends up being ugly and costly to conceal the piping.

Reply
Ivan Humberson
1/16/2024 11:19:32 am

You will definitely want to check with the AHJ to work toward a solution. If the jurisdiction enforces NFPA standards, then, to my knowledge, there is no NFPA compliant alternative to a 1-hour assembly that allows sprinkler-protected glazed openings.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
1/22/2024 03:49:20 pm

“Water curtains” are permitted to be substituted for fire-resistance rated (FRR) opening protectives in buildings protected throughout by an automated sprinkler system (ASPS) by the scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2021 705.8.2) if approved by the AHJ (e.g. Building Official).

Opening Protectives (OP) are (typically) required based on the Fire Separation Distance (FSD) between the Exterior Walls (EW) and adjacent building(s) and/or the property line(s).

ASPS are not permitted to substitute for the minimum FRR of building elements, components or assemblies UNLESS an “alternative design” is submitted the AHJ and they approve it (per IBC-2021 104.11). Other than the exception for OPs per 705.8.2, the 1-Hr Fire Barrier (1FB) protection of atrium (window) walls can be downgraded to a 1-Hr Smoke Barrier (1SB) if IBC-2021 404.6 (3) Exceptions are met. ASPS providers have tried to use this atrium ASPS exception as a substitution for other FRR assemblies. Only the AHJ can approve of these “alternative designs.”

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
1/22/2024 03:49:52 pm

REFERENCES
IBC-2021
Chapter 7 Fire and Smoke Protection Features
Section 705 Exterior Walls
705.8 Openings
Openings in exterior walls shall comply with Sections 705.8.1 through 705.8.6.
TABLE 705.8 MAXIMUM AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS BASED ON FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE AND DEGREE OF OPENING PROTECTION
705.8.2 Protected Openings
Where openings are required to be protected, opening protectives shall comply with Section 716.
Exception: Opening protectives are not required where the building is equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 and the exterior openings are protected by a WATER CURTAIN using automatic sprinklers approved for that use.

Section 703 Fire-Resistance Ratings and Fire Tests
703.2 Fire Resistance
The fire-resistance rating of building elements, components or assemblies shall be determined in accordance with Section 703.2.1 or 703.2.2 without the use of automatic sprinklers or any other fire suppression system being incorporated, or in accordance with Section 703.2.3.
703.2.1 Tested Assemblies
703.2.2 Analytical Methods
703.2.3 Approved Alternate Method
The fire resistance of building elements, components or assemblies not complying with Section 703.2.1 or 703.2.2 shall be permitted to be established by an alternative protection method in accordance with Section 104.11.

Chapter 1 Scope and Administration
Section 104 Duties and Powers of Building Official
104.11 Alternative Materials, Design and Methods of Construction and Equipment
The provisions of this code are not intended to prevent the installation of any material or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided that any such alternative has been approved. An alternative material, design or method of construction shall be approved where the building official finds that the proposed alternative meets all of the following:
1. The alternative material, design or method of construction is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the provisions of this code,
2. The material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, not less than the equivalent of that prescribed in this code as it pertains to the following:
1. Quality.
2. Strength.
3. Effectiveness.
4. Fire resistance.
5. Durability.
6. Safety.
Where the alternative material, design or method of construction is not approved, the building official shall respond in writing, stating the reasons why the alternative was not approved.

Chapter 4 Special Detailed Requirements Based on Occupancy and Use
Section 404 Atriums
404.6 Enclosure of Atriums
Atrium spaces shall be separated from adjacent spaces by a 1-hour fire barrier constructed in accordance with Section 707 or a horizontal assembly constructed in accordance with Section 711, or both.
Exceptions:
1. A fire barrier is not required where a glass wall forming a smoke partition is provided. The glass wall shall comply with all of the following:
a. Automatic sprinklers are provided along both sides of the separation wall and doors, or on the room side only if there is not a walkway on the atrium side. The sprinklers shall be located between 4 inches and 12 inches (102 mm and 305 mm) away from the glass and at intervals along the glass not greater than 6 feet (1829 mm). The sprinkler system shall be designed so that the entire surface of the glass is wet upon activation of the sprinkler system without obstruction;
b. The glass wall shall be installed in a gasketed frame in a manner that the framing system deflects without breaking (loading) the glass before the sprinkler system operates; and
c. Where glass doors are provided in the glass wall, they shall be either self-closing or automatic-closing.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT