|
|
Most cities require fire flow tests before design and calculation of a sprinkler system, but I have dealt with a few cities that instead use a water modeling system to calculate the pressure and flow at certain locations.
What is the reason for this? Are there benefits or downsides to one or the other? Is one more accurate? Thanks in advance - appreciate the input. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
16 Comments
When conducting flow tests and the desired flow (gpm) for the test is not obtained via a single 2-1/2" fire hydrant outlet, should additional flow be achieved by opening an additional 2-1/2" outlet on that SAME fire hydrant, or should a single 2-1/2" outlet be opened on an ADDITIONAL fire hydrant?
So for multiple 2-1/2" outlets opening and flowing, should this be done:
I have heard people say that (A) is correct and (B) is incorrect, and vise versa. Thank you. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe I'm quite familiar with conducting hydrant flow tests, NFPA 291, and have read articles such at the Sprinkler Age article from Feb. 2018. And I know the residual hydrant should be between the hydrant(s) to be flowed and the large source mains for the area.
But in terms of a specific project site (especially if the underground is well-gridded), would you chose the hydrant closest to your project to be the static/residual hydrant, or would you select the flowing hydrant to be closest to your project (and adjusting the static/residual for any elevation difference)? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe When we run hydrant flow tests, we usually use both 2-1/2" side-outlets of a typical dry fire hydrant. We hook up one, threaded, swivel 45-elbow on each side to divert water in a direction that won't destroy anything.
What is the appropriate Coefficient of Discharge when measuring the pitot on the centerline of the elbow? Traditionally flowing straight out of the side outlet of a hydrant, NFPA 291 gives three Coefficients (0.90, 0.80, and 0.70) based on how the outlet projects into the barrel. NFPA 291 also states that a coefficient of 0.85 is suggested for stream straighteners, unless the coefficient of the tube is known. Is there a known Coefficient for a single 45-degree elbow? Any help is greatly appreciated. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe Fire hydrant flow test question - is the pitot the same as the residual pressure on a water flow test from a fire hydrant?
Is it possible to know the residual pressure and 'chart out' the flow of the fire hydrant, or is there a way to determine the flow with only the static and residual pressures? Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe |
ALL-ACCESS
SUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop April 2023 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
May 2023
PE PREP SERIES
|
RSS Feed
