MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinkler Locations for Deep Waffle-Ceiling?

4/30/2021

7 Comments

 
We are designing a project which has Ordinary Hazard with unique beam pockets.

We have ceiling pockets which are 988 cubic feet (28 m^3) and so sprinklers are provided within them. The beam depth is large at about 4-feet (1.2 m). Each beam width is about 1-foot wide (300 mm). The beam center-to-center distance is 6'-6" (2 m).

Are sprinklers needing to be provided below the bottom of the beam, or not?

If sprinklers need to be provided below the bottom of the beam, what is the coverage area if sprinklers are already provided in the ceiling pockets?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments

Ignore Fire Pump Boost if City Supply Sufficient?

4/29/2021

9 Comments

 
​I'm designing a fire suppression system for a new boiler room at an existing hospital. It will connect to the existing fire suppression piping. The hospital is served by a fire pump, but the existing pressure at the street is satisfactory to supply this particular space with enough water for Ordinary Hazard Group 2 occupancy without the pump.

Do I still need to include the fire pump in the hydraulic calculation, or can I ignore it?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Manage Storage of Lithium-Ion Vehicle Batteries?

4/28/2021

8 Comments

 
What are your recommendations for fire safety of single height storage of Lithium-ion vehicle batteries?

Currently in our warehouse, in a sprinklered covered area, we are storing 3 to 5 of these lithium-ion batteries before they are sent to dealerships. We have security guards take 1-hour temperature readings throughout the day and night but little else has been put in place and a proper fire risk assessment has not been performed. Thanks in advance.
​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Drain Required with Each Pipe Drop Below Beam?

4/27/2021

17 Comments

 
In one of my jobs I have a fire sprinkler contractor who claims something that seemed strange to me. I have searched online but didn’t find the code section to show him.

He has laid out his Victaulic piping for two open space office under the beams and when I asked him why he didn't run them up high through the joists and instead only route the pipes underneath the beam where they have to, he responded that for each time that a pipe goes up and down, it requires a drain.

My question is in a wet sprinkler system in an office, do we need to provide drains for every time that a pipe is going few inches down and then back up? Since the entire system is wet and under pressure, are these drains necessary per any code? Whether we do require that or not, can anyone refer me to the pertaining code section?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
17 Comments

Penetrate Exit Stair with Duct Under NFPA 101?

4/26/2021

3 Comments

 
We have a high-rise building, with rated stair shafts. This project is under NFPA 101.

Under NFPA 101, Is is permissible to penetrate the wall of the stair enclosure (an exit enclosure) with duct that is not serving the staircase?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Is Cable Tray Above a Sprinkler an Obstruction?

4/23/2021

3 Comments

 
One of our projects has standard-spray upright sprinklers used in a place where cable tray is above the sprinkler deflector. The roof is non-combustible, and the deflectors are about 8.7-inches below the roof.  The cable tray and cables are about 4-inches above the deflector.

Is there any code issue here?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Owner Responsibility for Tenant/Inspector Plans?

4/22/2021

3 Comments

 
What is a building owner's responsibility to provide sprinkler system plans and calculations to new tenants and/or inspectors?

Is there any responsibility to provide these?

Code sections would be appreciated, thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments

Why Laminar Flow Means Higher Friction Factor?

4/21/2021

2 Comments

 
In regards to the Darcy-Weisbach equation and Moody Diagram - why does laminar flow (Reynolds number less than 2,000) correlate to a higher friction factor than turbulent flow?

Should turbulent flow correlate to a higher friction factor and therefore a higher pressure loss per foot of pipe?

I'm designing a system using a newly listed antifreeze with a viscosity of over 300 cP at -25 deg F. This causes a very low Reynolds number (around 250) since viscosity is in the denominator of the Reynolds equation. With a low Reynolds number, the Friction Factor is high (64 / Re) which makes sense because I'm calculating for antifreeze, but I don't understand how laminar flow correlates to a higher Friction Factor.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
2 Comments

How Are Fire Pumps Balanced?

4/20/2021

6 Comments

 
Do fire pumps typically come balanced from the factory for the desired flow and pressure?

I know they are supposed to, but (just like any other pump) is their balancing done similar to a regular pump to get the desired pressure so that the pump operates at its rated duty point? I am aware that many factors affect final pressure discharges (such as friction loss, etc.).

Have you ever seen pump manufacturers calibrate pumps to the desired flow/pressure in the field?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments

Sprinkler Protect Above & Below Narrow Baffles?

4/19/2021

5 Comments

 
How close can hanging baffles be spaced together before sprinklers are required below (and possibly above) them to provide full sprinkler coverage?

I have a situation where about 20 acoustical baffles will be hanging 6-12 inches below the ceiling. The baffles are 18-inches by 10-feet long, spaced 8-inches apart.

I've looked at providing sprinklers above them at the ceiling level, and it isn't clear cut; each individual obstruction is less than 4-feet wide, so I can see NFPA 13 (2019) Section 10.2.7.1.2(2) applying as long as you can sprinkler between them. But I think the baffles are located too close together to be considered non-continuous obstructions and their proximity would obstruct the sprinkler spray pattern development.

I've looked at Section 9.5.5.2, where continuous or non-continuous obstructions less than 18-inches below the sprinkler deflector prevent the sprinkler pattern from fully developing, but that section states that as long as no additional floor area is created then no additional sprinklers are required. Having a tough time believing that only sprinklering above the baffles will fully protect beneath them. Any help is appreciated!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

Sprinkler Protection Criteria for Fireworks Store?

4/16/2021

8 Comments

 
We have a client that is looking at building a fireworks retail store on the edge of town. The county is requiring the store to be sprinklered, but no one can give any direction on how to protect it and NFPA does not call out coverage for this type of business. 

It is an H-3 occupancy, covering roughly 10,000 sqft. 

Is there a standard that offers guidance on how to go about protecting a facility like this?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Does Corrugated Deck Affect Sprinkler Height?

4/15/2021

2 Comments

 
We have a project where we are trying to distinguish between frame and girder construction versus panel construction.

If we have steel frame and girder construction, beams are less than or equal to 7'-6" apart, but there is a corrugated deck that allows for heat flow above the girder (and wouldn't trap all heat), does this qualify as frame and girder?

Will the maximum deflector distance be 22-inches if there is a corrugated deck?

My assumption is "no" since heat is not capable of being trapped and a sprinkler needs to be placed in each bay within 12-inches of the deck.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
2 Comments

Nix Fire Pump Submerge Depth with Anti-Vortex?

4/14/2021

4 Comments

 
I'm working on a a high-end hotel which will have a vertical turbine fire pump above a water storage tank.

Can we waive a minimum pump submerge depth by installing an anti-vortex plate between the pump's bell and the strainer?

The fire pump is a 1,500 gpm vertical-turbine type, located directly above the water tank. The tank depth is 6'-3" from the overflow bottom down to the tank floor. The water tank area is 2,408 sqft. The selected pump recommends 51.63-inches as a minimum submerge depth. This is in addition to a 12-inch clearance between the bottom of the strainer and the tank floor. The water level to be maintained inside the tank then must be 63.63-inches (95,511 gallons).

The remaining active volume in the tank after extracting the required volume will be 112,582 - 95,511 = 17,071 gallons. This is not enough to run the pump set for the required time under NFPA 13 2019 (Table 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.3.1.2).

Can adding an anti-vortex plate between the pump's bell and the strainer waive this minimum submerge depth? If not, what might be a recommended solution for this?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments

Prohibit Open Flames in Biosafety Cabinets?

4/13/2021

0 Comments

 
I'm having trouble finding a definitive code section (in IFC or NFPA 101) about prohibiting open flames in biosafety (BSC) cabinets.

I have a position paper from the Institutional Biosafety Committee which references a lot of well-known organizations (such as WHO, NIH, CDC, etc.) and some manufacturers who strongly discourage the use of open flames in biosafety cabinets saying there are better alternatives to sanitize biological samples. 

I've also seen many college ESH references saying the same thing. 

The hazard is catching the HEPA filter on fire and in general I've read that an open flame is not good for maintaining the laminar air flow through the cabinet. However, finding something in code or selwhere prohibiting the use has proven elusive.

Anyone have any thoughts or references that would help here?

Unfortunately, it may take something directly from code to get the practice prohibited at my place of work.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
0 Comments

Who is Ultimately Responsible for a Design-Build Fire Protection Design?

4/12/2021

12 Comments

 
My question is more based on principle rather than design.

I have been in the industry for over years and keep coming to the same question lately; who is responsible for the end product on design and install?

I've had several projects in the last year where a "mechanical engineer (plumbing/HVAC)" are doing the layout for the schematic and bid drawings and don't have the complete knowledge of fire protection. I've had to deal with issues ranging from head spacing to pump specifications... and none of them have been close to code.

Specifically, I have a 3-story building with the 3rd floor at 30'-0" above apparatus / grade so there should be no need for standpipes. The plan/specs require an automatic-wet standpipe with a 125 psi @ 500 pump. I sent an RFI on why the need for the automatic-wet standpipes, where we can do away with standpipes or go to manual/wet and I was rejected. Ultimately, we were told to follow the prints....but we are "delegated" design. Eliminating the pump and standpipes, we could have saved the county $110,000+ (electric included).

I now have a church with 36-ft throw sidewalls and the engineer would like to stay with sidewalls and not have any pipe crossing the room; it's not possible with the supply.

In the end, who is responsible for the design and performance of the system?

If the contractor follows the plan/spec, is he liable because he is the "delegated" designer? But if the delegated design needs to change and is rejected, who is liable?

How do you bid plan and spec project if there are multiple issues with the bid plans? Do you redesign and bid it correct? No, you won't get the job. Or, do you bid per prints and then not be allowed change orders because you are the delegated designer?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments

How to Address Multiple Ducts Under 4-ft Wide?

4/9/2021

9 Comments

 
I have two large ducts 20-inches below sprinklers. One duct is 32-inches wide, the other is 42-inches wide. There is maybe 4- to 7-inches between them, only a couple inch gap on each side, running the length of a hallway.

The only rule for a continuous obstruction I can find says no coverage is needed below if the obstruction is under 4-feet. 

Individually these ducts aren't over 4-feet, but how does NFPA 13 address multiple obstructions like this?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments

Remove an Old Sprinkler System Entirely?

4/8/2021

8 Comments

 
If a building has an NFPA 13R system and the building is now being converted to a commercial building and does not require a sprinkler system for new construction, can you remove the system?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Permatex/Jute Allowed in Sprinkler Pipe Threads?

4/7/2021

1 Comment

 
Can Permatex Form-A-Gasket No. 1 Sealant be used in a fire sprinkler system to seal the pipes and threaded fittings instead of PTFE tape?

Also, if the installer added jute (fiber), is this acceptable?

I do not believe that NFPA 13 or UFC Criteria prohibits this practice, but wanted to ask.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
1 Comment

Recommendations to Reduce Sprinkler Clogging?

4/6/2021

5 Comments

 
I am a Fire Protection Engineer in Victoria working in a sugar refinery where we are proposing to protect existing raw sugar and white packaging storage. The raw sugar storage has piles of unrefined sugar in the warehouse which often clogs the sprinklers (like all other equipment in the area).

My advice to the client was more strict inspections and maintenance in this area, as well as to place metal guards to try and minimize buildup around the sprinklers.

The white packaging storage, although not as dirty as the raw sugar storage, has fine dust particles throughout. I'm not as concerned about this area.

We are not trying to re-invent the wheel here, and I'm sure there has been many acceptable solutions to minimize building on sprinklers.

What would you recommend to the client here to minimize the buildup?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments

Required Size of FDC Pipe for Larger Risers?

4/5/2021

8 Comments

 
NFPA 13 states that for hydraulically calculated sprinkler systems the fire department connection (FDC) pipe can be less than 4-inch diameter, but not less than the system riser.

What size should the fire department connection feed pipe be for a 6-inch riser, or an 8-inch riser?

Can the FDC pipe still be 4-inch for these larger risers?

I have some clients believe that 4-inch is the maximum no matter what, and some say if the riser is 6-inch or 8-inch that the FDC pipe needs to match the larger riser size.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments

Basis for No Hydraulic Calcs Under 20 Sprinklers?

4/2/2021

13 Comments

 
When 20 or fewer sprinklers are involved in a modification, codes and standards suggest new hydraulic calculations are not required.

What is the scientific or engineering basis for the "20-sprinkler" number?

Is there some study or analysis that found this to be a reasonable breakpoint?

I'm researching whether we should require full plans for less than 20 sprinklers. Thanks!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments

Sprinkler Pressure for "ESFR-Ready" Design?

4/1/2021

8 Comments

 
We are currently working on a project with a building height of 36-feet that currently has K16.8 ESFR sprinklers installed to protect open rack storage of Class I-IV commodities at 12-feet in height.

The hydraulic calculations are based on Ordinary Hazard Group 2, with a 0.20 gpm/sqft density over 1,500 sqft with a starting pressure of 7 psi. The design area is based on 18 ESFR sprinklers flowing at 100 sqft per sprinkler. The total sprinkler demand is 834 gpm. 

They are calling this an "ESFR-Ready" sprinkler system.

It seems to me that the building height would drive the starting pressure for this scenario and the calculation should actually be 12 sprinklers with a minimum starting pressure of 52 psi when using K16.8 ESFR sprinklers. This comes after examining Chapters 12-20.

What would the lowest starting pressure be for K16.8 ESFR sprinklers protecting open rack storage of Class I-IV commodities to 12-feet in height with a building height of 36-feet?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT