MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Fire Service Required to Run Underneath Footing?

7/12/2023

11 Comments

 
Are you required by NFPA 24 to enter a building underneath the foundation, or can you enter a building with the the fire service main from the side of the building?

Many are under the impression that due to the fact all illustrations in NFPA 24 show the fire main entering under the building, footing/foundation, that this suggests that it is a requirement.

Please can someone shed some light on this?

Regards.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Pete H
7/12/2023 06:49:13 am

From NFPA 24 (2019 ed.)

10.2.3: "Where fittings installed in a private fire service main must be installed above grade, the fittings shall conform to NFPA 13.

Additionally, Chapters 12 and 13 specifically refer to aboveground fire service mains (13 also refers to buried pipe).

I'm pretty sure you can have an aboveground incoming service, however it will require measures of frost protection, be that by conforming to NFPA 13 and 24 rules for exposed piping through heating the pipe or just being in an area that never cares about aboveground pipe freezing (like those parts where you see the exposed backflow devices outside every building).

My take: You can do it, but it's asking for some frozen pipe and damaged pipe. Typically you're tapping into an underground and often water authorities have additional requirements for the pathways of the utilities they have jurisdiction over, which may directly forbid exposed incoming services in their jurisdiction. So I'd still advise against it.

Reply
Anthony
7/12/2023 08:09:09 am

I agree with Pete here that it's a bad idea. However, I have seen this where "aboveground underground service" will hop from one building to another especially in an industrial setting. Usually its heat traced and wrapped.

Also tank feeds can be above ground and heat traced into a building.

Reply
Jesse
7/12/2023 08:29:07 am

Yep you can. And in areas not prone to freezing, its pretty common. A lot of Southern CA has riser outside the building. The issue being freeze protection and fittings. Once the underground isn't under-ground anymore, the fittings need to comply with 13, not 24.

Reply
JH
7/12/2023 08:31:24 am

I second both Pete and Anthony--

We generally don't allow that type of arrangement unless there are extenuating design circumstances, typically with a retrofit. And then they must show compliance with requirements for freeze protection and impact protection.

Reply
Dan Wilder
7/12/2023 09:10:40 am

Happens a lot in the Southwest. Sometimes by design, sometimes because the GC was in such a hurry to get concrete down for a work surface, they didn't think about the fire line stub up (which is often a scope gap between the underground and overhead contractors anyway).

If you look at the other side, there is nothing preventing that installation especially when the book has provisions when it is installed in this method.


As Pete said,
24-22'-10.2.3.1 for above ground fittings
24-22'-10.4.2.1.4 for freeze protection

Reply
Josh
7/12/2023 09:44:08 am

I don't allow it or do it under the footing because what if the pipe were to burst and water was to the point it made the footer unstable with it being completely below it. I ask my structural guys to drop the footers 2 ft and I go through them.

Reply
Fred Walker
7/12/2023 10:10:04 am

By code above ground, through foundation, or under foundation is permitted. Each method has specific requirements, advantages, and disadvantages.

Where large fire service mains are underground significant facility damage is possible should a leak or break occur.

Where mains are above ground weather protection can be critical especially in locations not normally subject to abnormally cold temperature since maintenance features may not be appropriately serviced.

Reply
Janak Patel
7/12/2023 10:44:49 am

Code, NFPA 24 nor NFPA 13 prohibit an above ground entry of a fire water feed to a building. As mentioned by many of the commentators, a 'freeze protection' system is required in a areas where the ambient temperature could go below 32 deg. F.

Also, if the external wall, through which the fire water feed line is entering a building, is a 'fire rated wall', then the piping penetration shall be a fire rated one.

Reply
Glenn Berger
7/12/2023 11:40:14 am

In your case there is one one answer fits all cases. If you are in a non-freeze environment, it is common to have the sprinkler riser and backflow preventor outside the building. When you need to be underground to enter the building, coordinate with the structural engineer.

Reply
Chris Hall
7/13/2023 01:51:00 pm

Down in Texas buildings have the UG rise up above the slab and then turn to go in to the building through the exterior wall all the time; especially in retrofit situations. And they work really well. If you are worried about freezing we have seen the GC build little "dog houses" around that exterior pipe with insulated walls and then make the opening where the pipe in penetrating the exterior wall of the building really oversize or the size of the "dog house". In Florida there are tons of complete risers outside that turn and go in to the building after the flow switch and all that stuff.

Reply
Ron link
1/20/2026 06:06:54 pm

When I was desiging in South Florida, it was common to stub in through an exterior wall above grade. In some cases, the entire sprinkler riser was actually outside of the building with full exposure to the elements. We have even stubbed in from the outside of an existing building and installed heat trace and monitoring where saw cutting and routing under the building is not cost effective.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 3-601-02
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT