MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Is SDR21 OK for Combined Domestic/Sprinkler?

2/19/2024

8 Comments

 
We have a private water main feeding a combined domestic and NFPA 13 system that was specified as C900. They installed SDR21 (6") instead.

They are using the argument that this 200 psi rated pipe will not be subject to the fire system pressure and therefore is ok.

I cannot find where this is listed for fire service mains. Any direction?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Glenn Berger
2/19/2024 08:11:44 am

Most municipal water systems have underground water mains that supply both domestic and fire use and do not use NRTL fire system approved piping.

I see no issue here, except contract non-compliance which apparently did not have proper oversight.

Reply
Anthony
2/19/2024 08:20:31 am

SDR -21 is covered by AWWA C605-21 I think. Thats not a recognized standard in NFPA 13 nor NFPA 24.

If you allow the substitution, then you're taking on the responsibility for any problems with a water main that's buried. I like to stay away from those kinds of problems personally. I'd make them re pipe it. Or paper yourself very heavily away from any liability.

Reply
Scott McBride
2/19/2024 08:24:33 am


If they specified C900 in the approved plan review, they must get the AHJs approval before installing an alternative. As for the piping itself so long as it meets the requirements of NFPA 24 there should be no issues. Depending on your fee schedule they could be cited for installing non-approved piping per the plan review without prior AHJ approval.

Reply
Scott McBride
2/19/2024 08:31:49 am

The approved piping is per NFPA 24 Table 10.1.1.1 and at first glance SDR-21 is not an acceptable alternative. Unless I am missing something.

Reply
Franck
2/19/2024 10:09:39 am

As indicated above, the final situation might be acceptable for its use, but it is more a liability issue and who will be responsible at the end if you accept it.
If it was specified as C900, they should have installed C900.
If a deviation was necessary (or more comfortable for the contractor) it should have been asked prior the installation.
The question is : would it be considered acceptable by AHJ if asked prior to installation ? If the answer is no, it is still not acceptable !

Reply
Casey Milhorn
2/19/2024 10:36:57 am

As others have said, put your concerns in writing, divorce yourself from the liability as much as possible, and move on. I assume you are the contractor and not the engineer of record.

From a practical stand point: Should be fine and I assume the FDC is on the downstream side of a double check valve assembly and won't be an issue if/when they energize the system. Unless city pressure consistently is known to have water surge in that area and reaches 175 psi and over, should be fine from that perspective.

From a code/standard point: The water department standards should rule here (before the individual backflows). If they are okay with DR21 for domestic use, should not be an issue for combined use either.

From a contract perspective: If you aren't the specifier, engineer of record, etc... and only the installing contractor, you should be fine. As others stated, voice your concern in writing that it deviates from the contract documents and move on. I assume you probably calculated with DR18 so your calcs should have a little extra cushion now that you have larger ID pipe.

By the way, this arrangement is not very common, at least in our area. Every water dept here either asks for a master meter at the road, and then they will allow a combine service line for full 13 systems, or they just don't allow this arrangement at all. It can have it's downsides, especially for the water dept.

Reply
Robert Morgan
2/19/2024 01:44:22 pm

Unfortunately our State (Illinois) health department now requires combined domestic and fire lines. We typically have a meter pit with an F-2 meter, the split occurs inside.

Reply
Mark Harris
2/19/2024 05:04:34 pm

FM approved C900 fire mains are DR14 for Class 200 and DR18 for Class 150 (think may change above 12"). I would be curious what the water company uses? If they use DR21 (which my bet is no) then like most comments above say will it work, yes. Is it correct if spec said C900 fire main, no. The lower the DR the thicker the pipe wall and higher cost per foot. If install is accepted the end user or general contractor could be justified asking for a credit. If they have to give money back maybe the site utility contractor (most likely) that installed the DR21 will read the spec next time. Hopefully they transitioned to ductile iron outside building and did not bring the plastic above through basement wall or above floor.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT