MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinkler Locations for Deep Waffle-Ceiling?

4/30/2021

7 Comments

 
We are designing a project which has Ordinary Hazard with unique beam pockets.

We have ceiling pockets which are 988 cubic feet (28 m^3) and so sprinklers are provided within them. The beam depth is large at about 4-feet (1.2 m). Each beam width is about 1-foot wide (300 mm). The beam center-to-center distance is 6'-6" (2 m).

Are sprinklers needing to be provided below the bottom of the beam, or not?

If sprinklers need to be provided below the bottom of the beam, what is the coverage area if sprinklers are already provided in the ceiling pockets?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
andrew k
4/30/2021 08:24:30 am

If you can measure from each sprinkler to the CenterLine of the adjacent beams(in both directions) and maintain proper sprinkler coverage (probably 130sqft or less) then we can consider the "beams as walls" and coverage below beams is redundant and not required.
What do you all think?

Reply
Franck
4/30/2021 08:39:06 am

I don't know if we can consider the beams as walls, as there might be storage, equipment, etc. undernetah that would not be properly wetted by the sprinkler system. If it was a unique beam, it could maybe considered acceptable, but with multiple occurence, you may not control the fire underneath and finally overtax you ceiling sprinkler protection by opening too many heads, as the fire couled spread in the "unwetted alleys" below the beams.
But again, this is a gut feeling...

Maybe it could be interesting to make an elevation drawing with the beam depth, beam separation distance and water distribution pattern from the sprinkler (depending on its position below the ceiling), obstructed by the beams...

Reply
Luke M link
4/30/2021 09:29:38 am

Assuming you are using standard pendent or upright sprinklers, I believe NFPA 13-2019, 10.2.7.1.2(2) would apply. For spacing against a wall, refer to NFPA 13-2019, Figure 10.2.7.1.2(c).

Reply
Franck
4/30/2021 08:34:56 am

Personal interpration
If you apply table 10.2.7.1.2 (NFPA 13 - 2019), then your sprinkler is located 2 ft 9 in. (850 mm) from the beam if centered inside. This means that the maximum allowable distance above the bottom of the obstruction is 7-1/2 in. (190 mm). If you add this distance top the maximum allowable distance below the ceiling (22 in. or 550 mm), this means that if you beams is deeper than 29-1/2 in - or 2 ft and 5-1/2 in. (740 mm) you have an obstruction to the sprinkler discharge (as you have 4 ft - 1.2 m).

I am afraid that in you case you will have to provide sprinklers below one every 2 beams, centered below the beam.
For ordinary hazard, you need a maximum spacing of 15 ft (4.6 m) and a maximum protection area of 130 sq ft (12 m2).
The maximum distance between sprinklers below the beams should be 10 ft (3 m) as the distance in the other dimension is 13 ft (4 m).
Another solution is to provide sprinkler under each beam, with a maximum distance between sprinklers under the beam of 15 ft (4.6 m). But this would result on much more sprinklers and piping installation.

Interesting to see others point of views :)

Reply
Mike
4/30/2021 08:48:38 am

No you don't. Space within the pockets. Max Deflector distance is 22".

Reply
Dan Wilder
4/30/2021 10:03:50 am

I'm missing something I think....
Pocket is 988ft³ / 4 ft = 247ft²
Beam spacing is 6'-6" OC
247ft² / 6.5ft = 38' long bay?

How is this not falling under Concrete Tee construction and using 10.2.6.1.2 (5)? The width is less than the depth and it meets the criteria.

In addition, if these were steel I beams with 1' flanges, I would not be thinking about putting sprinklers under the flanges and I would utilize 10.2.7.1.2(2) and use the spacing to the centerline of the obstruction.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/30/2021 01:10:47 pm

If I am clear on the situation, you would just apply the "4' rule" as most designers call it. There isn't a diagram or drawing in NFPA 13 for this rule and you might be surprised how many designers don't know this rule, I believe mainly because it doesn't have a diagram or drawing in the book. It's in the first part of the obstruction rule section. I can't see how this wouldn't apply to this situation. As far as spacing, you are still covering floor space, so you will max out at 15' along the pockets (depending on the length of the pocket) and be 6'-6" between heads the other way. If the concrete tee rule can be applied, you might be able to skip every other bay. You could also technically use the obstructed construction rule to save a little pipe on the sprig length, but being 22" down doesn't really help anything other than that. The beam will still be an obstruction at 4' deep.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Oct '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT