I have sprinklers at an exterior overhang over 100 feet above the floor (ground) it protects. There will not be anything stored directly beneath the overhang.
There is occupiable space above the overhang. It's noncombustible construction; a mid-rise office tower. Questions have been brought up about heat collection, and the effectiveness of sprinkler spray: if there was a fire on the ground level, will enough heat be collected at the overhang 100-ft up in order to operate an intermediate temperature sprinkler that is 286 degrees F? What will happen if there are high winds (common for this area)? And if the sprinklers do discharge, will the water spray droplets evaporate before reaching a proximity of effectiveness? Will a "cooling effect" even happen? The AHJ will allow the sprinklers to be omitted. I'm not seeing anything specific to very high ceilings in NFPA 13 (2016). My question to you all: Where can I find the science to backup their decision? Do you know of any resources where this scenario has been studied, evaluated, or fire-modeled? (FM or non-FM?) Obtaining a PE review is not a desirable option. (I am aware that FM datasheets address this scenario as requiring sprinklers.) Thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Pete H
4/19/2023 07:05:21 am
If the AHJ is allowing the heads to be omitted (as they should, there is zero chance any heat collection happens to make these things go off), I'm pretty sure there's an item of code that points out the AHJ has final say.
Reply
chad
4/19/2023 07:25:36 am
Yeah code aside, there is no point in sprinklers up there unless its less than 10' from another structure
Reply
Jesse
4/19/2023 08:06:01 am
If the AHJ is amenable to omitting automatic sprinkler in this area, I would. Its non-combustible with no combustible material underneath.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
4/19/2023 08:33:01 am
Are Fire Sprinklers Required for a Canopy?
Reply
Dewayne Martinez
4/19/2023 08:36:12 am
As pointed out in a previous Meyer Fire post https://www.meyerfire.com/blog/are-fire-sprinklers-required-for-a-canopy
Reply
SCHULMAN
4/19/2023 09:05:56 am
Around here, If the canopy is non-combustible and there is no permanent "furniture" below or storage (it's not a loading area), there should be no need for sprinklers regardless of the height above the ground.
Reply
Dan Wilder
4/19/2023 05:42:21 pm
Considering nearly all fire departments can't even put manpower that high in a truck, not to mention the poor service fitter going back out to stick on some escutcheon, I would request the omission/variance with the substantiation of height, expected wind, service, and overall lack of effectiveness for putting a system in 9-10 stories above a non-combustible area.
Reply
Alex
4/19/2023 06:01:25 pm
Do you have an observation deck or something similar? As others mentioned, no requirement for sprinklers below the projection.
Reply
Quentin M Maver
11/29/2023 10:37:56 am
NFPA requires sprinkler protections under projections 4'>. NC-IFC does not specify width, "any projection requires sprinkler". I had a new store that had projection 3'11" and they stored combustibles underneath. They provided a set of plans; I advised them that North Carolina was not a NFPA state and uses IFC. They installed the sprinklers.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop January '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
February 2025
PE PREP SERIES |