MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Hang Pipe from Extremely Old Wood?

4/12/2023

11 Comments

 
What concerns should I have about hanging from old wood?

Like very old wood, almost petrified?

Picture
I'm doing an NFPA 13R job for an old historic building that has been moved. I don't know how old, but it uses full dimension wood. The 2x's look like they measure 2-inches thick.

I'm wondering what hanging to this old dry wood is going to be like?

Do they need to predrill? Are screws better?

Any ideas appreciated!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Todd E Wyatt
4/12/2023 07:25:31 am

Per NFPA 13D, piping support shall be per its listing limitations. If the listed pipe does not include piping support requirements, it shall be supported “from structural members using support methods comparable to those required by applicable local plumbing codes.”

2021 IPC Section 308 Piping Support includes prescriptive requirements including structural attachment, interval of support, and hangar spacing.

REFERENCES
2022 NFPA 13D
Chapter 7 Installation
7.4 Piping Support.
7.4.1
Listed pipe shall be supported in accordance with any listing limitations.
7.4.2
Pipe that is not listed, and listed pipe with listing limitations that do not include piping support requirements, shall be supported from structural members using support methods comparable to those required by applicable local plumbing codes.

2021 IPC
Chapter 3 General Regulations
About this chapter: Chapter 3 covers general regulations for plumbing installations. As many of these requirements would need to be repeated in Chapters 3 through 14, placing such requirements in only one location eliminates code development coordination issues associated with the same requirement in multiple locations. These general requirements can be superseded by more specific requirements for certain applications in Chapters 3 through 14.

Section 308 Piping Support
308.1 General
Plumbing piping shall be supported in accordance with this section.
308.2 Piping Seismic Supports
Where earthquake loads are applicable in accordance with the International Building Code, plumbing piping supports, anchorage, and bracing shall be designed and installed for seismic forces in accordance with Chapter 16 of the International Building Code.
308.3 Materials
Hangers, anchors and supports shall support the piping and the contents of the piping. Hangers and strapping material shall be of approved material that will not promote galvanic action.
308.4 Structural Attachment
Hangers and anchors shall be attached to the building construction in an approved manner.
308.5 Interval of Support
Pipe shall be supported in accordance with Table 308.5.
Exception: The interval of support for piping systems designed to provide for expansion/contraction shall conform to the engineered design in accordance with Section 316.1.
TABLE 308.5 HANGER SPACING
308.6 Sway Bracing
Where horizontal pipes 4 inches (102 mm) and larger convey drainage or waste, and where a pipe fitting in that piping changes the flow direction greater than 45 degrees (0.79 rad), rigid bracing or other rigid support arrangements shall be installed to resist movement of the upstream pipe in the direction of pipe flow. A change of flow direction into a vertical pipe shall not require the upstream pipe to be braced.
308.7 Anchorage
Anchorage shall be provided to restrain drainage piping from axial movement.
308.7.1 Location
For pipe sizes greater than 4 inches (102 mm), restraints shall be provided for drain pipes at all changes in direction and at all changes in diameter greater than two pipe sizes. Braces, blocks, rodding and other suitable methods as specified by the coupling manufacturer shall be utilized.
308.8 Expansion Joint Fittings
Expansion joint fittings shall be used only where necessary to provide for expansion and contraction of the pipes. Expansion joint fittings shall be of the typical material suitable for use with the type of piping in which such fittings are installed.
308.9 Parallel Water Distribution Systems
Piping bundles for manifold systems shall be supported in accordance with Table 308.5. Support at changes in direction shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Where hot water piping is bundled with cold water piping, hot water piping shall be insulated in accordance with Section 607.5.
308.10 Thermal Expansion Tanks
A thermal expansion tank shall be supported in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Thermal expansion tanks shall not be supported by the piping that connects to such tanks.

Reply
Dan Wilder
4/12/2023 07:42:00 am

Honestly, that will probably be the best install that will have the least amount of splitting wood install. Even the old building wood in Phoenix that is super dry after 70+ years does better than the new lightweight framing common in new builds.

Install should be per MFG direction/recommendations as to predrilling.

Reply
Ray Hardy link
4/12/2023 08:11:54 am

Drill for an eyebolt and fix a back-plate for stability I would think. Coach-bolts where you can. Maybe consider some additional fixings to spread the point loading. I'd be selective where I ran the distribution mains and certainly consider double point fixings.

Reply
Ray Jackson link
4/12/2023 08:16:12 am

Could you place a 2 x 4 on top of the existing and use that for your hanging points?

Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/12/2023 08:21:05 am

I prefer side sammys over the straight ones, especially if you are concerned with "pull out". They also allow for adjustment of rod without having to recut, or cut too exact in the first place.

If you have concerns over the ability of the structure to support the weight of the water filled pipe or pull out of attachment, definitely get the structural engineer involved (if there is one), if not the architect would probably be the correct person to get the RFI.

Reply
Adam
4/12/2023 09:16:56 am

I have been involved in the substantial renovation of several century buildings.

In my experience, these older buildings with rough sawn lumber framing which used to support lath-and-plaster finishes are more substantially built than modern wood-frame buildings. The conversation could be reversed - I would have more concern over modern wood-frame structures failing under normal conditions!

You would need to check bearing points of the members, since this is where your weakest link would likely be. Sometimes joists are side-nailed to studs when ballon-framed, but overall, I would not be concerned with the load-bearing capacity or splitting potential of these structures.

Reply
Anthony
4/12/2023 09:50:06 am

The question if the building can hold load is a question for the architect and structural engineer of the project. They need to take responsibility for the 'fitness' of the structure and for stability and occupancy.

If you're unsure if you can screw into the wood, I'd suggest using side Sammy's or through bolts and angle nuts on strut.

Reply
Glenn Berger
4/12/2023 11:12:19 am

I fully recommend consulting with a structural engineer prior to executing the installation.

Reply
Dave
4/12/2023 11:20:04 am

I have always consulted with my more experienced fitters before listing, then list an assortment but of the many historic (by west coast standards) structures I have enjoyed working on, with better-quality tight-grained wood, I have not had negative feedback from fitters on hanging. I agree with Casey on the side-Sammys, and Sammys in general due to small diameter, Coach Screws with pre-drilling in some places, and ceiling flanges where it makes sense. CAution is prudent, but I wouldn't make it more complicated / expensive / time-consuming than it needs to be. As Anthony said, the structure is up the the architect and structural, just add your usual disclaimers.

Reply
SCHULMAN
4/12/2023 11:36:04 am

I have found old wood to be superior originally and stronger now than any new wood ever is.

Reply
Alex
4/12/2023 10:48:05 pm

Hate to be the one to defer the question, but I would consult a structural engineer. You want to make sure the wood is still in good shape and can handle the additional load.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT