MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About
Picture
A FORUM FOR FIRE PROTECTION QUESTIONS & PE EXAM PROBLEMS | SUBSCRIBE NOW

Use Existing Fire Pump for Higher Foam Demand?

9/17/2020

7 Comments

 
We have scenario where we are using foam system under NFPA 11 for a floating roof tank with Crude Oil.

Based on our previous calculation for a prior tank the fire water demand is 1,926 gpm so we have existing 2,000 gpm pump to be able to supply the required flow. But an additional Crude Oil tank has been added and we have run our new hydraulic calculations and we come up with 4,496 gpm new flow requirement.

Is there a way we can still use the existing fire pump?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
Dan Wilder
9/17/2020 10:52:38 am

The only way I see this working is if you setup the pumps in parallel. As the old pump works for the original remote area it's a matter of setting the second pump up for the correct "PSI ON" for sequencing along with the correct proportioner requirements

The bigger issue is going to be the suction/discharge/testing/bypass piping of the pumps to take on the additional volume (again, the assumption that the current setup is 10", the new setup would require 16" incoming and 14" discharging for example) per NFPA 20.

I am also assuming this is a municipal/site supply capable of handling the flow demand. If it's pulling from a tank/pond/reservoir those calculations will also need to be reviewed.

Reply
Brad K
9/17/2020 12:42:45 pm

I agree with the above. The suction sizing was my first concern for parallel pumps. Please consider the ID of suction pipe if HDPE pipe in play. This is a common issue.
Also, recommend extensive support from the pump supplier to assure sequencing and piping requirements.

Reply
Jon Dimanlig
9/17/2020 08:02:54 pm

Water source is coming from a Fire water storage tank. We are using a balance pressure pump proportioning foam system.

Reply
anthony brown
9/17/2020 01:39:37 pm

Some questions and some assumptions: I am assuming that this is a Wet System and that it is using low expansion foam. Is the Bladder Tank able to hold capacity, I'm assuming that it is sized for the existing system, and if I am reading your question correctly a new oil storage tank was added and that created the additional loading. final assumption is that you are supplying the system from a Municipal source i.e. "City Water".

Running two pumps drawing form one source will require a 16" supply and a 14" system as already mentioned. Can the supply in the street cover that size pipe and can you buy a 16" BFD? In addition it is likely that you will have to get a new Bladder and hopefully you will have space to place it.

I'm thinking your best bet would to be get the new pump and supply it with new street supplied service. Run your calculations to size the required service. I think when all is said and one it will be a safer, cheaper, and efficient way to go.

Reply
Brett
9/17/2020 02:51:39 pm

What is the reason for simultaneous foam application on the two tanks? What is the separation distance between tanks? Most multi-tank farms are not designed for simultaneous foam application across all tanks. I would recommend speaking with the local AHJ to determine what their requirements will be before proceeding. The local fire departments operational procedures for response to the facility should be taken into account in the design.

Reply
SK
9/17/2020 04:40:04 pm

Certainly your new demand (4496 gpm) can not be met by existing Pump (2000 gpm) if scenario established to needing water/foam in both tanks together. The way I see with limited information which you provided, foam system for both tanks together probably not required in any scenario and other tank may need only water spray. It depends where you are applying foam whether it's for Seal RIM fire (external floating room) or for Dike protection. Please note that foam is ONLY meant to protect from pool fire scenario whether it's on roof or at ground. For Exposure/Cooling protection water spray system is required for adjacent tank (s) if these tanks are located downwind and affected by thermal radiation from "Tank on Fire". So in either the case, if foam applying for one tank, other will need water spray only. Water Spray can be limited to unwetted surface only for nearby tanks. Another scenario for crude tank fire is "Roof Lost Fully Involved Tank Fire" where you can not do anything for the "Tank on Fire" except watching helpless, you need to let that burn but your focus should be shifting to protect other adjacent tank(s) from heat exposure to avoid escalation. It is worth noting that "Roof Lost Fully Involved Tank Fire" is not credible scenario and failure frequencies for such scenario are very rare if tanks are complying API/ANSI requirement. However before I address your concerns more appropriately; appreciate following information;

1. Tanks Sizes (ID and Height)
2. Type of Tanks (whether it's Dome Roof with IFR or External floating Roof, If it's Dome roof, what is the slope angle for roof.
3. Are both tanks placed in same dike or not (this will change your protection philosophy.
4. Prevailing wind direction/Or confirm tanks is affected if there is fire on other tank either on top of roof or in dike.
5 Are these semifixed or fixed foam system Automatically operated.
6. How you getting 4496 gpm, I means what is being expected to operate.

Regards
Sunil

Reply
Mike
9/17/2020 04:42:50 pm

I agree with Brett. Scenarios are based on one fire event. In my experience, if tanks are closer than 1 diameter cooling water is used on adjacent tanks. API 2030 and NFPA 15 are good references along with NFPA 30. Maybe a radiation study would be more revealing in actual risks.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jump to: Daily Posts
    Jump to: PE Problems
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    Free Signup

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    Community

    Thank You to Our Top
    ​October '20 Contributors!
    1. SK
    2. Franck
    3. Dan W.
    4. Jonathan ​5. Casey M.
    6. Sean
    7. Colin L.
    8. Mike
    9. Jonathan J
    ​10. Daniel G.


    Your Post

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    The Toolkit

    Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
    ​
    ​Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
    Picture
    FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    Filters

    All
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    IFC
    Information Sources For Analysis
    IRC
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 12
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management Systems
    Special Hazard Systems
    Types Of Analysis
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015


    Daily
    Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    Exam Prep

    Picture
    2020 PE Prep Guide​
    ​(Available Now!)
    Picture
    PE Prep Series
    ​(Available Now!)
    2020 PE Prep Series
    Current Leaderboard
    ​(Click to enlarge)
    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep

    PE Problems
    ​Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

    Solutions are posted the day after posting.

    Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

    Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

    RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store
Picture
Copyright © 2020 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About