MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Test Procedure for Booster (Unlisted) Fire Pump?

9/11/2020

4 Comments

 
In an existing building utilizing a “booster pump” or unlisted fire pump for a standpipe or sprinkler system, is there a suggested annual flow test procedure?

I realize there is no manufacturer’s data (0%,100%,150% rated capacity) to compare the results against.

Should it be excluded from the annual flow test requirements, and just flowed during the 5 year roof top flow?

I would appreciate input as well as, what others in the industry are doing to address this fairly common scenario.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Franck
9/11/2020 10:30:32 am

If there is no historical data, you can at least compare to the pump nominal point.
Sometimes you have the churn point (pressure - no flow), nominal point (nominal pressure - nominal flow) and overload point (pressure at 150% flow) on the plate on the pump casing.
If not, you may have at least the nominal point (flow/pressure) and you can compare with a theoretical curve as the pressure at churn point should be less than 120% of nominal pressure and pressure at overload point should be more than 65% of nominal pressure.
And you can start from this point to make your own historical data, year after year.
I would anyway make an annual flow test at 0%, 80%, 100%, 120% and 150% to give a trend over the years.

Reply
Peter
9/11/2020 10:46:24 am

The best I've ever been able to come up with is to have a conversation with the AHJ. I've seen some pretty bizarre "fire pumps" where it is part irrigation pump, part fire pump, etc. In some instances the AHJ asks we put a pitot on it to just capture as much water flowing at as much pressure as it can output. In other instances, the AHJ has looked back at historical records and given the original design data to which we can then test from. In other instances, we've had to calculate the system and then determine if the pump can achieve the demand. In a lot of instances the demand that was needed 50 years ago may be different than what is required per NFPA 13/14/etc. today, so having that conversation with the AHJ is important. From that point forward you can use that data to compare against to determine if performance degrades.

The fun part about these old pumps, especially ones that are dual purpose (provide some irrigation pumping or something else) is that sometimes they've been changed. In a situation we were dealing with, I assume that at some point the pump died and the lawn sprinkler guy came and replaced the pump. He assumed that the whatever sized existing pump was to powerful and not necessary to pop the lawn sprinklers up, so he put in a 1.5HP irrigation pump in it's place. He thought he was doing the customer a favor by putting in less expensive equipment.

Reply
Brian Gerdwagen FPE
9/14/2020 09:32:40 am

An unlisted booster pump, assuming that you mean a jockey pump, does not require a listing and does not require testing. As said above, you can start flowing the pump and recording data to compare to later tests.

If this is an unlisted pump that is the main fire pump, there should be a project started to replace it. Pumps are expensive, but to the owner, so are lawsuits. I can not comment on continuing to use an unlisted pump this way.

Reply
Peter
9/14/2020 11:22:03 am

I believe the original post was in regards to using an unlisted pump as the main 'fire pump' of the fire protection system. I have personally seen this a number of times on older buildings.

I think you'll have a very difficult time trying to convince an owner to replace a pump especially if it is functional. In the instances where we have come across these pumps, we've advised the customer that the pump isn't a listed fire pump installed per NFPA 20. This is usually the first time they've ever heard of that, since other contractors typically don't recognize or say anything about it. Even after you get the interest piqued the costs could be tremendous.

In an effort of transparency to the customer they may ask what the cost is and some costs could include:

New pump and motor
Change of piping orientation to meet NFPA 20
Change of pipe size to meet NFPA 20 and hydraulic needs
New controller to meet UL 448 and signal reporting to an NFPA 72 FACP
New transfer switch (and possibly generator if one doesn't exist or isn't sized to accommodate the load)
All the electrical work that is needed to connect everything
New backflow prevention if backflow prevention doesn't exist
Trenching the area to the new backflow to place tampers on the valves.
New FACP and potentially bringing the entire fire alarm system up to code if the FACP can't handle pump run, phase reversal, pump fail or the new tampers. (quite often older buildings have older conventional FACPs that simply don't have the available zones on the FACP to accommodate the new items).

The above are real life and I have actually had to do every one of those things on a project where the pump needed to be replaced. Sure, a pump is expensive at maybe $15-30k for the pump and electric driver and labor. Then add in all of the above and the project could easily skyrocket to the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Try explaining this to a customer who has never been told that their "fire pump" isn't a fire pump. Which is why I always start the conversation with. "Mr. Customer, you contracted us to test your pump. This isn't a listed fire pump and we should thing about an upgrade option. However, in the mean time, let me reach out to the AHJ and get the guidance I spoke of above." In that conversation you can feel out the AHJ to see if they would enforce replacement of the pump. If the customer calls the AHJ after you tell the customer they need to replace the pump and the AHJ says "why in the world would you replace the unlisted pump and spend all that money to upgrade?" then you're going to have a very hard time justifying yourself.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT