Is Pitot the Same As Residual on Flow Test?

12/27/2019

Fire hydrant flow test question - is the pitot the same as the residual pressure on a water flow test from a fire hydrant?

Is it possible to know the residual pressure and 'chart out' the flow of the fire hydrant, or is there a way to determine the flow with only the static and residual pressures?

Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe

6 Comments

Mike L

12/27/2019 08:09:36 am

Pitot Pressure and Residual Pressure are two separate measurements. Pitot pressure is used to calculate the flow rate from the hydrant that correlates to the residual pressure being read.

The values of Static Pressure (no flow) and residual pressure (at the calculated flow rate) are then plotted on a graph to produce the water supply curve.

Please read NFPA-291 for Hydrant Flow Test procedures and resultant calculations.

Wayne Ammons

12/27/2019 09:17:05 am

To add to what Mike said, you can conduct a flow test if you do not have a pitot tube:

NFPA 291, 2016 Edition:

4.9 Determination of Discharge Without a Pitot.

4.9.1 If a pitot tube is not available for use to measure the hydrant discharge, a 50 or 60 psi (3.4 or 4.1 bar) gauge tapped
into a hydrant cap can be used.

4.9.2 The hydrant cap with gauge attached is placed on one outlet, and the flow is allowed to take place through the other outlet at the same elevation.

4.9.3 The readings obtained from a gauge so located, and the readings obtained from a gauge on a pitot tube held in the stream, are approximately the same.

joe

12/28/2019 02:26:17 pm

What do you do if the city fire don't have a residual for a preliminary calculation on a bid? some cities i deal with only have static and pitot it is not smart to drive 2 hours one-way for to make flow test on a job you may not get. i just trying to figure out a way to get a residual what the city doesn't have a residual pressure.

Joe Meyer

12/30/2019 07:41:29 am

We don't have flow test information for many bids we go after. It's extremely annoying and not helpful to the project.

If we are calculating a system we will generally have some idea of what the area can handle from a water-supply perspective.

If an area is very hilly, I will check the elevation of the project compared to nearby projects I've completed or the elevation compared to the nearest water tower. I've been able to estimate water supplies using this method too.

Ultimately, you may consider protecting your bid by qualifying it with an assumed water supply - if the job actually requires a fire pump then provide an alternate price for it. Most projects for us are generally pretty straight-forward as to whether it would need a pump or not based on the building's height and hazard.

Mike L

12/30/2019 02:43:49 pm

1 more thought...I believe that in order for a water supply to be considered a municipal supply, it must be able to deliver a minimum of 20 psi residual. So you could use that as a basis to develop your bid/pump requirement. I would qualify the bid stating that absent of verified residual pressure an assumption of 20 psi was assumed.

Jack G.

12/18/2021 09:28:30 pm

A lot of times the specs ( in my area ) have the engineer performing and furnishing the test. Sometimes they have the bidder furnishing a test,
When no information is available , a water moratorium, drought, I will qualify my bid with a flow test my pipe sizes are based on m without a pump. ( I do have a flow test “ encyclopedia” over 3 states , over 57 years to rely on ) . I qualify that if a pump is required, for my bid, it can be negotiated, and does not include electric.
A project without a flow test, is asking for trouble.

Leave a Reply.

Home
Our Cause

The Blog
The Forum

PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit
MeyerFire University

Pricing
Login
Support
Contact Us

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.
All text, images, and media Copyright © 2016-2024 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

Is Pitot the Same As Residual on Flow Test?

Leave a Reply.

ALL-ACCESS

SUBSCRIBE

COMMUNITY

YOUR POST

PE EXAM

FILTERS

ARCHIVES

PE PREP SERIES