MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Which Hydrant to Flow for Well-Gridded Supply?

3/24/2022

10 Comments

 
I'm quite familiar with conducting hydrant flow tests, NFPA 291, and have read articles such at the Sprinkler Age article from Feb. 2018. And I know the residual hydrant should be between the hydrant(s) to be flowed and the large source mains for the area.

But in terms of a specific project site (especially if the underground is well-gridded), would you chose the hydrant closest to your project to be the static/residual hydrant, or would you select the flowing hydrant to be closest to your project (and adjusting the static/residual for any elevation difference)?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Jesse
3/24/2022 08:08:16 am

Sounds like you're pretty familiar with 291, which is good. I've kicked flow tests back to field crews because they did it wrong more times than I can count.

For me, I always specify the residual hydrant to be the one closest to the project. Our calcs effectively go from the pressure end head sprinkler through the AS piping, through the riser, and then from the base of the riser to the residual hydrant. Obviously we have to account for the friction loss realized in the underground so by having he residual hydrant closest, that's less pipe I have to account for.

I just had this conversation with a designer who put the water supply node about 6-ft from the base of the riser when in reality, its 1000-ft away through a network of UG pipe to the residual hydrant.

Reply
James Phifer
3/24/2022 08:10:07 am

From the Appendix of NFPA 13:A 24.2.2 (2016 ed)

The proper method of conducting this test is to use two
hydrants in the vicinity of the property. The static pressure
should be measured on the hydrant in front of or nearest to
the property and the water allowed to flow from the hydrant
next nearest the property, preferably the one farthest from the
source of supply if the main is fed only one way. The residual
pressure will be that indicated at the hydrant where water is
not flowing.

Reply
Brad K
3/30/2022 10:59:25 am

Great response from James P. here and correlates to Jesse's response.

Reply
Glenn Berger
3/24/2022 08:12:57 am

One thing that I have done in well-gridded systems is to shut off a valve and perform the test towards the shut-off valve.

Reply
NK
3/24/2022 09:01:08 am

I always flow the hydrants closest to the building because that's basically simulating the flow of the fire sprinkler system in the direction of the building if there was ever a fire. If you think you have a abnormal site loop I would recommend conducting 2 or 3 flow tests to make sure your calculation works with the worst case scenario.

Reply
Alex
3/24/2022 02:22:18 pm

Hi,

I agree with NK. I would flow the hydrant closest to the site. Do you have a picture of the UG network? This could be used to tell where the building service is feed from. If you aren't familiar where the building service connects, I would recommend flowing 2 hydrants like NK mentioned.

Thank you!
Alex

Reply
Brian Gerdwagen FPE
3/24/2022 10:24:59 am

The residual hydrant is where your flow and pressure results are valid and where you stop your hydraulic calculations.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
3/24/2022 10:31:01 am

I love this topic because it leaves so much room for interpretation (due to actual placement of hydrants, elevations, etc.) and is something that so many AHJs, designers, engineers, etc. have questions on. James is correct, and you do want your static to be as close as possible to your connection point. I will add on a gridded city system, I believe you can place your test point (adjusted for elevation) at the system connection to the city main. Been awhile since I've read 291.
If on an unverified city gridded main, or a confirmed one way city main, the calculation should go back to the gauge hydrant. What is interesting is that many people will actually take it to the hydrant, through the gate valve, and whatever pipe is in the branch feeding the hydrant. By doing it that way you are adding friction loss that wouldn't occur in the normal flow path. IMO the test point should be at the tee of the gauge hydrant for a single direction (or dominant flow) city main and at the system connection point for a gridded or looped city system where pressures and flows are expected to be practically constant from hydrant to hydrant (relative to area and elevation).
An interesting thing about performing flow tests on a dominant or single direction city main is that if you reverse your hydrants, you are actually hurting yourself. You are robbing water before your gauge hydrant and you will see a drastic drop in residual pressure many times. If you design off of this flow test you definitely are overdesigning the system, or even adding fire pumps where otherwise would not be required.
I will say the most common issue I see is not accurately taking elevation into account and applying hose allowances in the wrong place in the calc. I would almost guess at 25% or more calculations that I see have one or both of these wrong.

Reply
Chris Logan link
3/24/2022 02:15:14 pm

I typically flow water past the project, and take residual from the hydrant closest to the project.

(A) (B) (C)

A-Flowing Hydrant
B-Static/Residual Hydrant
C-Project

Reply
Jack G
3/24/2022 02:44:24 pm

As a double check, since you need to flush your underground supply, I would gauge the hydrant closest to the property, put a test header on the F&S, after flushing. Roll out the hoses, pitot, and I don’t believe you can get base of riser flow and pressure more accurate than that. Opinion. Number of hoses depends on calculated demand.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT