MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
    • [THE ALL-NEW SITE]
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Window Sprinklers in lieu of Barrier for Escalator?

11/26/2020

2 Comments

 
I have a question about protection of sprinklers in windows specifically for a connection of a basement parking garage and a first level mall commercial space.

NFPA 101 accepts that there is a connection between both occupancies, but there must be compartmentalization of 3-hours without automatic sprinklers and 2-hours with automatic sprinklers. In this case, we have an escalator from the basement up to level 1, as shown below:
Fire Sprinklers at Escalator

Can we consider this to be compartmentalized with glass and sprinklers on both sides of the glass?

Do the access doors have to be 1-1/2 hour, our could they not have any fire resistance if I have sprinklers on both sides?

This project is under NFPA 101 (specifically Table 6.1.14.4.1 for separation between occupancies), NFPA 5000, and NFPA 13 (9.3.5/19.4.3 for sprinkler protection of windows).

Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
2 Comments
Franck
11/27/2020 01:38:59 am

It may depends on the AHJ if he recognizes that the sprinkler protection can act as a 1h fire barrier (if the parking is fully sprinkler protected, the 2h requirement can be reduced to 1h, see § 5.2.2 below).

In that case, you can apply NFPA 13 §9.3.5 for spacing and location of sprinklers (figure A 9.3.5 is quite helpful) and 19.4.3 for the design of your water curtain (to be installed at the lower level, in your parking area).
Many insurance companies won't as a fire barrier is a passive protection, while the sprinkler protection is an active protection that may be impaired (have an impact on the PML - Probable Maximum Loss / MFL - Maximum Foresseable Loss).

If you check NFPA 88A (Standard for Parking Structures), it is indicated the following for compartmentation:

5.2 Compartmentation.
5.2.1
Those parts of parking structures located within, immediately below, attached to, or less than 3 m (10 ft) from a building or another occupancy used for any other purpose shall be separated by walls, partitions, floors, or floor–ceiling assemblies having fire resistance ratings of not less than 2 hours, unless otherwise permitted by 5.2.3.

5.2.2
The 2-hour fire resistance rating required in 5.2.1 shall be permitted to be reduced to 1 hour where the parking structure is protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system.

5.2.3
No fire-rated separation shall be required when parts of a parking structure and a building used for any other purpose are separated by 3 m (10 ft) or more, and are attached only via open pedestrian balconies or bridges, or open vehicle bridges.

Reply
Franck Orset
11/27/2020 01:43:36 am

Be anyway careful with the sprinkler protection of the parking structure.
The OH Gr 1 density is somehow very optimistic and might change to an Extra Hazard occupancy in the very next future.

According to NFPA 13 (2019 Edition), parking structures should be protected as an Ordinary Hazard Group 1 occupancy, with a density of 6 mm/min over 186 m2 (0.15 gpm/sq ft over 2000 sq ft) for a wet system, or over 242 m2 (2600 sq ft) for a dry system.
This was based on the way vehicles were constructed until the 80’s, with a major use of metal components.
Because of major changes in the composition of modern vehicles, the hazard exposure has completely changed.
The transition began in the 1960s on the vehicle interior, as softer materials and padded dashboards were desired over steel dash panels for crash protection.
Main difference are:
- Extensive use of electronic components, increasing the combustible load with wiring and electronic components
- Use of plastic parts for the vehicle body, to gain weight, for better corrosion resistance or for people safety, such as the front and back ends (bumpers) that used to be made of metal and are now made (since the 19710s) of expanded plastic foams (urethane) and plastic.
- Use of plastic fuel tanks - now standard on about 80 percent of vehicles – that can melt when exposed to a fire, and then rupture and send the entire gasoline content to the ground, contributing to a combustible/flammable liquid spill pool fire.

Modern vehicles are now composed of about 50 percent plastic by volume, even though plastics account for only 10 percent of the average vehicle’s weight.

In addition, there is a growing concern with alternative fuels such as CNG, LNG, LPG or hydrogen, that present potential for explosion hazards (BLEVE effect) when exposed in a fire event, and electric car with the use of lithium-ion batteries that present an additional fire hazard and ignition source.

A typical garage fire today is much more likely to involve multiple vehicles than two decades ago. In addition, fires are burning with more severity and are much harder to extinguish.

A study made in, France showed that in garage fires between 1995 and 1997, 98 percent involved fewer than four vehicles; only 1 percent of fires involved more than five vehicles, and none of the fires reviewed involved more than seven vehicles.
By contrast, 8 percent of the garage fires between 2010 and 2014 involved more than five vehicles, and 6 percent involved more than seven vehicles.

The same study showed that in 1997, 95 percent of garage fires analyzed were extinguished in under 60 minutes. However, in French garage fires occurring between 2010 and 2014, only 40 percent were extinguished in under an hour; 30 percent of the fires took more than two hours to extinguish, and 10 percent took more than four hours.
By contrast, fewer than 1 percent the 1997 fires took longer than two hours to put out.

There is an excellent article in NFPA journal - 2019 March/April issue – Ramp Risk

You can also look at the following event that took place in 2017 in the UK (the parking was not sprinkler protected, but was an open parking structure that is not required to be sprinklered by NFPA 88A).
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Publications-and-media/NFPA-Journal/2019/March-April-2019/Features/Protecting-Parking-Garages

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-46290095

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​August '23 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
    • [THE ALL-NEW SITE]
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT