MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Why Not Hard Pipe Sprinkler Drain to Sewer?

8/6/2020

11 Comments

 
I'm interested in hard piping the sprinkler system drain down pipe into the 6" sewer via a closed system.

My inspector can't tell me why I can't and says I need to build a 4" stand pipe with a wet trap. This will use a lot of water throughout the years just to keep the trap wet and will only be used once a year.

Why can't I hard pipe the drain into waste and avoid the air gap with a wet trap?

I would welcome any comments from anyone.

​​​​​​​​Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Jonathan Sullivan
8/6/2020 10:25:53 am

The plumbing code won't allow a direct connection to the drain. This is another layer of backflow prevention.

This type of discharge is an indirect waste and requires an air gap or air break depending on how it is classified, ie potable or non-potable.

This must discharge into a waste receptor (floor drain, sump, mop sink, etc) that has a wet trap.

You then have two options to protect the trap as it won't be used often, either a trap seal or a trap primer.

See IPC 802 for indirect waste requirements and 1002.4.1 for trap seal protection.

Don't forget you also need fixture venting.

Reply
Matt Cornell
8/6/2020 10:57:30 am

Mr. Sullivan is absolutely correct. If you are wanting to conserve water the mechanical seal is best. Take a look at the Sure Seal by Rectorseal SS2009V

Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
8/6/2020 11:16:54 am

Thanks Matt. I too prefer an seal, less moving parts. Just make sure it's ASSE 1072 conforming.

And if permitted a bit of mineral oil.

Brian Gerdwagen FPE
8/6/2020 11:00:07 am

There are two problems I have encountered:
1 - Local water company wants the sprinkler to drain to storm since the water is unmetered and they do not get revenue to pay for the cost of treating it.
2 - Local water company cares about the environment and wants to treat the water instead of dumping it in the storm water flow, so it needs to go to sanitary.

Either option should have an airgap so that pressure does not build up and sprinkler water flows out of the air vents elsewhere in the building. I would never use a wet trap. If a trap is used, a mechanical trap seal would be my recommendation.

Reply
Glenn S Berger
8/6/2020 11:46:41 am

Agree with Mr. Sullivan, having the air gap also gives you visual indication that the system is draining. I do not recommend discharging over a flat floor drain, provide funnel drain connection and locate where tripping can be minimized.

Reply
Sue
8/6/2020 02:38:31 pm

Where I work, the only places you can discharge a fire sprinkler system is into a landscaped area, an approved bio-swale with erosion protection or to sanitary with the approval of the Sanitary agency. We are no longer allowed to flow directly to storm because of the issues of pollution. When going into the sanitary system it has to be with an air gap or a wet trap. The flow of the fire sprinkler system must be taken into consideration when using an air gap because they can splash all over the room.

Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
8/7/2020 06:51:17 am

Sue - what jurisdiction is this? What specific pollution issues are encountered here? Is the sanitary system also overwhelmed?

Reply
Mike
8/7/2020 09:41:09 am

Wet traps stop sewer vapors from entering the building.

Have never seen a hard piped drain before in the manner you describe.

TBO designing a drain connection is really out of your scope as a fire sprinkler technician. This would be the mechanical or plumbing engineers responsiblility.

Reply
Brad K
8/7/2020 10:39:29 am

System drain connection are the sprinkler design responsibility as pertains to NFPA 13-8.16.2.4...and on.
Also 8.16.2.6.1 (2010-16) prohibits this connection specifically.
see also 8.16.2.6.2

Things to consider for system drains:
-Main drain tests and inspector tests can be overwhelming for some plumbing due to pressures and flows involved.
-Visual confirmation of drain water is typically preferred for system testing and service.

Reply
Chris link
6/18/2024 05:38:05 am

Choosing not to hard pipe the sprinkler drain to the sewer makes a lot of sense. While it might seem like a convenient solution, it could pose significant environmental and regulatory challenges down the line. By opting for a more sustainable approach, such as directing the sprinkler drain to an appropriate drainage system or a separate holding tank, you're not only adhering to environmental guidelines but also ensuring long-term compliance and efficiency. It's great to see proactive decisions being made in fire safety that consider broader environmental impacts

Reply
Sean
10/16/2025 10:11:13 am

NFPA 13 (2016 edition), Section 8.16.2.6.1:
"Direct interconnections shall not be made between sprinkler drains and sewers."
Appendix 8.16.2.6.1: "Where possible, the main sprinkler riser drain should discharge outside the building at a point free from the possibility of causing water damage. Where it is not possible to discharge outside the building wall, the drain should be piped to a sump, which in turn should discharge by gravity or be pumped to a wastewater drain or sewer."
8.16.2.6.2 "The drain discharge shall conform to any health or water department regulations."

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT