MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Who is AHJ for Oil Storage at Terminal Facility?

11/4/2021

10 Comments

 
We have a project for an NFPA 11 foam system. The foam system is used to protect oil storage tanks at different terminal facilities.

Under Chapter 12 of NFPA 11 (2021 Edition), who is the party that inspects and signs off on these systems as the AHJ (Authority Having Jurisdiction)?

Is it the local jurisdiction's fire marshal, the facility's insurance company, or the facility itself?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Pete H
11/4/2021 06:51:21 am

Just going to hazard a guess to be taken with a grain of salt: it would vary from state to state. Has your state adopted NFPA 11? Has your local fire marshal adopted NFPA 11? If yes to both, then your local fire marshal would be the AHJ. If yes to the state but not to the locality, a state fire marshal would be the AHJ. If no to both but the system is a requirement from the insurance company, the insurance company is the AHJ. If it is for a federal facility, a federal AHJ might be involved.

Based on NFPA 11 (2016) Chapter 11 where the AHJ and the property owner are routinely separated when discussing testing, I would estimate the facility itself is specifically not the AHJ.

Reply
Anthony
11/4/2021 08:19:59 am

The AHJ is the person in charge of the people who show up to put the fire out.

They cannot write or change code that is set by state law ie building code. They are asked to consult on specific items of the code. Such as stand pipe hose locations.

The AHJ, usually a fire marshal, can delegate sign off and inspection to a specific civic organization like a building inspector Dept ECT.

The insurance company is never the AHJ they may ask for a higher degree of protection but cannot specify anything below building and fire code. The insurance company can always ask for copies of signed documents but that's between the owner and insurance company.

Reply
Alex
11/5/2021 07:11:14 am

Hi Anthony,

I agree, the AHJ is typically either the state or local fire marshal. Although, like Pete H mentioned above, there are times where the insurance company can be the AHJ as well.

For a project of this magnitude, I would say it would fall under the State.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Glenn Berger
11/4/2021 08:25:24 am

Dependent on the location and the user, it could be anybody that you list, and that I will add the Owner's Fire Protection Engineer or Safety Engineer.

Reply
Robert Kluck
11/4/2021 09:12:02 am

While the true Authority having Jurisdiction , in the legal sense, is the Local Authority signing off on the project permits, I think a case can be made that both (Town and Insurer) have authority, and facility. Think of it this way:

Finalize a design without the Town authority and you operate without a permit and the facility is fined and then you're fired.(PS: Also look at state and federal rules pertaining to the facility - there may be special federal standards that address your type of facility).

Finalize it without the Insurer's agreement and you're uninsured, have to get more expensive replacement insurance, and then be fired.

Finalize it without having checked and meeting the Corporate Standards and you're fired.

If you enjoy your work, figure out which of the three is the most stringent and then explain to the other two why you need to design to exceed THEIR requirements. That is usually an easier argument to win than the reverse.

Reply
David Williams, FPE link
11/4/2021 09:17:44 am

Having done FP design work at LNG, oil terminals, and oil pumping stations I note that interstate facilities are often under a State's Office of pipeline safety delegated from the Federal CFR regulations. The local fire departments have some say since they have to fight the fire.

Reply
Joshua Freedman
11/4/2021 11:34:10 am

As an insurance inspector, I have to say the AHJ can be multiple parties. I have been involved in several projects where there were multiple AHJs. The Fire Marshal will have to sign off on projects, but sometimes the City has looser requirements than everything considered under NFPA or FM and will make allowances, but if their insurance isn't satisfied with the plans, they may have to do additional things which they will be upset were not considered under the original project. I have been involved in projects where I have been ok with less than the City, and also, conversely, required more than the City was. Making changes during the planning phase is a lot more cost effective than starting the engineering and permitting process all over again. If I were you, I would submit plans to the Fire Marshall as well as their property, liability, and work comp coverages (hopefully all the same provider) to make sure everyone is ok with it and you can explain to your client how you are providing them high level service.

Reply
Douglas Krantz link
11/4/2021 11:52:33 am

In the NFPA 72 (for fire alarm systems – I assume that other code publications are similar), under the definitions in the front of the Code Book, the list basically that there is an AHJ. But when looking in the back of the same Code Book, in the Annex or Appendix, the NFPA goes into more detail about what the mean.

They list a whole bunch of people who are AHJs.

The fire marshal is one – the one most interested in protecting from fire

The representative of the insurance company is another one – after all, it’s the insurance company that pays when something doesn’t work

Even the owner is an AHJ – the owner owns it

All three of these have different levels of expertise, but all three of those have to agree before it’s approved for occupancy.

The writers of the code also say, in the NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm Code Handbook, available from the NFPA along side the Code Book, that if there’s a conflict between what the code says, and what an AHJ says, that the system must be installed according to the most stringent requirement.

A few of the AHJs may have official capacity, usually determined by the government, but all of them may have something to say about the installation.

Reply
Jesse
11/4/2021 04:19:59 pm

It could be an all-of-the-above thing. Not sure where this is, but in Texas we have overlapping AHJs in which there are municipalities and quasi-municipalities that are separate, yet equal political subdivisions. So we have many projects that have multi permits required.

You also need to consider the insurer. They are a contractual AHJ meaning that in execution of the policy, the insured has ceded some legal responsibility for loss control in return for the transference of risk. In nearly every case, the insurer uses the most recent edition of NFPA and occasionally has more stringent requirements for some things like forest products manufacturing and petrol-chemical.

So they may require a plan submittal as well.

Good luck

Reply
Mike
11/5/2021 06:07:18 pm

Depending on your jurisdiction, sometimes fire protection piping is considered Process Piping and only goes through the refiners engineers. But the same facility goes through another jurisdiction which requires City Fire Department Approval.

The standards are usually NFPA or customer's own specifications but have never been less than NFPA in terms of coverage and density. The only thing I have seen different is discharge duration.

Also seeing a lot of bladder change outs to get rid of PFOS. Those have been unpermitted without AHJ approval in most cases.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​May '22 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT