If I have multiple compounding remote area adjustments, when does the minimum remote area size for high-temperature sprinklers get applied?
For example, if there is a dry system protecting storage starting at 2,500 sqft, which calculation is correct?: (a) 2,500 sqft x 0.75 (high-temperature reduction) = 1,875 ... rounded up to 2,000 sqft for minimum area, then 2,000 x 1.3 (dry system area increase) = 2,600 sqft. or (b) 2,500 sqft x 0.75 (high-temperature reduction) = 1,875 ... 1,875 x 1.3 (dry system area increase) = 2,437 sqft, which is greater than the 2,000 sqft high-temperature minimum. Thanks in advance! Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
3 Comments
Wayne Ammons
12/24/2019 09:45:56 am
Referencing NFPA 13, 2013 Edition
Reply
Juan M
12/24/2019 10:50:39 am
This is a good question. After going over NFPA 13 section 11.2.3.2.7, A.11.2.3.2.7, & 11.2.3.2.7.1 (2016 edition), I think "b" is correct. If you do the math as follows, accounting for the dry system increase first, then take the high temperature reduction you get "b".
Reply
Jonathan Joseph
12/24/2019 11:14:35 am
I believe the intent of the 25% high temperature reduction for Extra Hazard occupancies is to give additional 5% reduction to dry systems but keeping a wet system above 2000sqft as a standard for Extra Hazard.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop November '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2024
PE PREP SERIES |