MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Ways to Limit Pump Discharge (175 psi) at Churn?

7/25/2022

14 Comments

 
Are there any good practices or other viable options allowed by NFPA 20 (other than a Pressure Limiting Driver) to limit the fire pump discharge pressure to at churn to 175psi when there is a high static pressure on the water supply?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments
Alex
7/25/2022 05:18:46 am

Can you install a PRV immediately down stream?

Reply
Dan Wilder
7/25/2022 08:04:47 am

Talk to your pump rep to get the flattest impeller curve available or maybe (if the water supply is strong enough) increase the GPM of the pump to bring your actual demand point onto a lower part of the curve before it hits 100%. Placing a PRV immediately downstream of the pump is the only other option (verify a low flow bypass isn't required) however, make sure the jockey pump is set correctly.

If the system demand is that close, may think about either a single PRV on a lower floor or changing to 300 PSI sprinklers for that level.

Reply
Darin
7/25/2022 08:12:26 am

How about an adjustable pressure regulator at the BF device prior to the pump intake

Reply
Glenn Berger
7/25/2022 08:14:36 am

Prior to actually designing or installing any deviations to NFPA 20, you need to get the AHJs approval.

Reply
Eric
7/25/2022 08:18:22 am

I'm working on a fire pump with this particular issue atm, so good timing on the question! Your two choices are either a PRV after the pump assembly and before the transition to the sprinkler system riser, or a relief valve piped to a safe discharge location.

Both approaches have their pros and cons. For the PRV you need to make sure everything upstream of it is properly rated for the higher pressure. This includes flanges, control valves, check valves, and even the sensing line to the controller. For the relief valve you need to make sure it is sized correctly and has a safe place to discharge a potentially large amount of water, and if you are in a colder climate not create freeze risks at the discharge location.

Generally the relief valve is more of a pain since you will have to deal with it's water discharge every time the pump does it's weekly churn test.

In my case we are actually going with both due to the water pressure being unstable with occasional high static peaks. We will have the PRV set to 170psi leaving the pump room, and a 4" relief valve set to 275psi so it won't open during standard churn static pressures will if the pump churns during one of the pressure spikes we've noticed recently.

Reply
Greg
7/25/2022 08:19:17 am

If the answer is not being found within the pump driver, or pump / impeller set up, and the problem is more of a water-hammer issue, I would suggest reading the following blog on topic by Bermad, a manufacturer of pressure reducing valves and pressure regulating bladder tanks.

https://blog.bermad.com/fire-protection/reducing-water-pressure-surge-and-water-hammer-in-fire-protection-systems

Reply
David Kendrick
7/25/2022 08:26:40 am

Forgive me, I should look up the current standard.

My experience with this issue is that an upstream device has to fail in the open position.

It was a long time ago and finding a UL listed PRV that failed in the open position wasn't available.

Since then I think Inbal has a PRV that both fails in the open position and is UL listed for fire protection use.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
7/25/2022 09:08:44 am

Don't forget if you are adding a PRV before a feed to standpipes, then you must install (2) PRVs (pressure reducing valves) in series with a bypass around them. (Per NFPA 14). When feeding more than 2 hose valves.

As others have said, there are quite a few pumps out there now that have very flat curves, if not completely flat. We had one recently that actually had a 99.6% churn. There are even some multiport pumps on the market in the states now.

Also, make sure you really do need to limit the pressure to 175 psi. Many of your fittings, equipment, and sprinklers are rated to 250 psi plus now. You just have to make sure EVERYTHING is rated for whatever churn pressure you are seeing. Also, make sure you order (or adjust) the pressure relief valves at any floor zone assemblies. Typically those are factory provided at 175 psi. Also be aware that they are not known for being 100% accurate. Sometimes they have a 5 to 10 percent variance.

Great question.

Reply
Dave
7/25/2022 11:28:58 am

Be cognizant of restrictions on the use of PRV's on fire pump system piping in NFPA #20 "Maximum Pressure for Centrifugal Pumps" section (4.7.7 in the 2013 through 2019 editions). If you have the NFPA #20 Handbook, it goes into even greater detail.

4.7.7.1 The net pump shutoff (churn) pressure plus the maximum static suction pressure, adjusted for elevation, shall not exceed the pressure for which the system components are rated.

4.7.7.2* Pressure relief valves and pressure-regulating devices in the fire pump installation shall not be used as a means to meet the requirements of 4.7.7.1.

NFPA #20 covers through the discharge isolation valve. Downstream of that is covered by other standards.

Reply
Franck
7/25/2022 01:09:17 pm

As indicated by Dave, PRV is mandatory per NFPA 20

Reply
Greg
7/26/2022 04:03:31 pm

I'm wondering now if the question involves a supply from a elevated water tower, tank on a high-rise building, or an outside water cistern on a mountaintop ?

Is the fundamental question really, "What is the water supply graph showing theoretically at the pump intake?"

and based on that, is the pump needed ? is it in the right place on the system ?

a very curious problem to have.

Reply
Jack G
7/26/2022 05:13:05 pm

Its possible to recirculate the relief valve discharge back into the suction to control the excess pressure.
Remember the following: you must pay attention to the pump design so as not to create major problems.
An improperly designed pump with a 6 inch relief valve, and say relieving 25 psi, would be throwing out the relief drain, approximately 750 gpm. This could impact the pump suction and waste a lot of fire protection water. ( at churn)
Now if there is a fire , the relief valve will close as the system demand increases.

Reply
RAYMOND DELLING
7/27/2022 05:45:06 am

To add to the Question.

I have a scenario:
Static/Residual: 50psi/49psi
Elevation of Test and Pump is the same
Electric fire pump churns at 120psi (at factory)

What we have found is that when the pumps are field tested they 'over' perform by 5-6% and ends up churning around 126-127psi and puts the system pressure over 175psi.

What do you do in this scenario?
Install PRV?
Is 1-2psi a big deal?

What if you installed a fire pump in a building adjacent to this property 2 years ago and the flow test was 5psi less, and the fire pump was churning at 125psi?

Where do you draw the line?

Reply
Casey Milhorn
7/27/2022 11:48:08 am

In my opinion, no, 1 to 2 psi or even 5 to 10 psi isn't a big deal. We all have systems we've installed right at 175 psi churn and the pump over performs, or the water supply gets better. Many pump suppliers will go ahead and quote a 250 psi flange on the discharge of the pump when approaching 175 psi total churn, with this expectation.

You will lose 5 to 10 psi of pressure in elevation, depending on the elevation of the system at roof, and that is where most of your concern is at (with the sprinkler heads). Most fittings, pipe, and even a decent amount of valves are rated to 250 psi or more, and that's why I say it's not a huge concern. Also many sprinklers are now listed to 250 psi.

Also I put on a different hat on for new install vs an existing condition. New, I would really try and follow the book to a T, planning for future variance in water supply. After the fact, we may not have enough data to condemn and could possibly be outside the scope of NFPA 25 anyway, BUT it's definitely worth a side note if it's evident the system began life at 175 psi or below. You want to cover your tail on it for sure. I think this is one of those times you give the owner the info, maybe a price to remedy it, and they get to make the decision on their building and pocket book.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT