MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Water Storage Tank Size Related to Fire Pump?

1/20/2023

14 Comments

 
For determining the capacity of a water storage tank, is the tank capacity calculated by the max flow extension of a pump curve or by 140% rated capacity? Or could it even be 120% of the pump rated capacity?

Looking for guidance on how the pump size and water storage tank size would be directly related.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments
Dan Wilder
1/20/2023 07:17:39 am

My approach has been to provide 150% of the pump capacity (140% refers to rated head I believe) multiplied by the duration needed as the "Useable" volume. Find the tank size that provides at least that minimum amount.

This assumes that the usage is based on the most flow demanding of the site fire flow, standpipes, and sprinklers for the durations needed based on what the fire pump is suppling (Fire Flow may have a different duration than the sprinkler/standpipe requirements). If the fire pump is not supplying fire hydrants, I have omitted hose stream requirements which greatly reduces the tank size.

The size of the tank can also be reduced with a reliable refill source offsetting the GPM usage by the available GPM refill.

Reply
Alex
1/20/2023 08:03:23 am

To add off of Dan, make sure you account for unusable water within the tank and ensure you have enough head to get to the suction side of the pump.

Reply
Dan Wilder
1/20/2023 09:14:25 pm

This is what happens when I start a paragraph and get distracted.

2nd paragraph is what I use , the 1st paragraph was to reference the 140% vs 150% as it relates to testing of the fire pump which is typically piped back into the tank anyway so it's not really being "used" per se.

but in whatever calc gets you there, make sure that the tank picked is based on usable gallons. The intake plate that sites 1' above the floor of the tank can easily lose up to 10% of the tank capacity.

Reply
RayJ link
1/20/2023 08:35:18 am

I have always used these formulas taken from NFPA 13.
System Demand + Hose Demand X Duration equals gallons.
(Approx.Tank size).
Density Area X Hazard + Hose Demand = Approx. Pump size (in gpm)

These figures can be then enlarged or reduced as needed.

Reply
COLIN LUSHER
1/20/2023 08:38:02 am

The only ACTUAL requirement from NFPA 22 that relates tank size to fire pump capacity is for a "break tank". In this case, the minimum size for a break tank is 150% of pump capacity for 15-minutes. For anything OTHER than a break tank, the demand is based solely on the demand and duration of the fire suppression system (standpipe or fire sprinkler, whichever is most demanding), independent of the fire pump capacity. While many, like Dan mentioned above, may consider the fire pump size when determining tank size, it is NOT a requirement of NFPA 22 to the best of my knowledge.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
1/20/2023 08:51:51 am

It's also a good idea to make sure the tank isn't expected to provide fire flow demand as well, which could be more GPM and duration than the fire sprinkler demand. I have had an AHJ take a tank from something like 15k gallons to 80k gallons on a small light hazard building all because of fire flow. That's assuming the tank is feeding hydrants or will have a draft hydrant connected to it.

Reply
Pete D.
1/20/2023 10:32:34 am

^ This.
I've always used fire flow, which is loosely defined as the greater of the overhead sprinkler demand or the fire flow tabulated value (with any reductions) where AHJ approved.

Then you can take a deduction for the assumed tank re-fill flow rate (giving you in essence a net tank drain rate) x fire flow duration.

And this is how industrial sites end up with 500kgal tanks.

Reply
Glenn Berger
1/20/2023 09:57:13 am

You need to consider the location of the pump and water tank with respect to hydrants. Sometimes hydrants are not located downstream of the pump/tank assembly. Also you need to consider the max flow of the sprinkler system and the max flow when testing the fire pumps.

Reply
Sean
1/20/2023 10:49:42 am

tank size is based off the dystem demand times the duration.

Reply
Franck
1/20/2023 11:18:30 am

For an existing system, take the flow demand of the most demanding area from hydraulic calculations, add the water supply requirement for hoses and multiply by the required duration.

Most of the time, as the nominal flow of the pump should cover the most demanding area, you can simply do the nominal flow (100%) times the duration.

The specific case of a break tank is different because it has a limited capacity and if the break tank is empty after 20 minutes and you need 1 h duration, then you have a big problem ! This is why 150% nominal flow of the pump is indicated (safety margin).

For a new project, when no calculation has been done, if you want a rough idea of the needed tank capacity, you can simply make the following calculation:
Most demanding (design density x area of application) x 1.15 (to consider friction losses, as a conservative approach).
Add the demand for hoses
Multiply the total by the duration.

For example, if most demanding area will be 0.3 over 2500 for 1h30 minutes, plus 500 gpm for hoses, the end result will be:
[(0.3 x 2500 x 1.15) + 500 ] x 90 = 122,625 gal
And if you want to be a bit more conservative, assuming that you will install a 1500 gpm pump (for the demand of sprinkler + hoses), you can design the water tank to 135,000 gal (1500 x 90). This will give you some margin for possible future project at this location !

Reply
Michael Christensen
4/16/2024 12:09:47 am

I think that it is important to remember why the tank is being used. There are three types of tanks that I typically deal with:

Fire Water Storage Tank: This is a tank that is able to meet the supply for the duration. This would be the similar to the examples above with the calculations initially being something similar to:

Sprinkler demand + Hose Allowance = GPM
GPM x duration = required gallons

since the tank is capable of meeting the demand the filling of the tank is more minimal, capable of being accomplished in 8 hours.


A Break tank is as a tank that the fire pump takes suction from and is not able to meet the minimum required volume. There are minimum break tank sizing typically 15-minutes of operation (see NFPA 22). Fire pumps need to operate within the range of 150% of the rated capacity so the fill to a break tank needs to be sized to accommodate 150% of the fire pump rated capacity although there are exceptions to reduce this to 110% of the system demand (see NFPA 22) if needed. I have sized the minimum useable volume starting with:
rated pump x 1.5 x 15min = minimum gallons


A Secondary on-site water storage is required for high-rise buildings in seismic zones. The IBC reference 2021 IBC is 403.3.3 and is to be at least the sprinkler demand, with hose for 30-minutes.

(Sprinkler demand + hose) x 30-min



In all instances I think that allowance should be added for the top of the tank as well as the bottom of the tank. In the appendix of NFPA 22 it has an example. In the example accounting for the top and bottom increased the size from a 30,000-gallon tank to a 40,000-gallon tank. Whatever the numbers end up being they are what they are, just be able to justify or explain it. I have had jurisdictions require that the engineer submit a calculation of the useable volume in the tank.


If you are not at the stage of the project that you have the calculated sprinkler demand yet you can estimate it by

design density x design area x hydraulic balancing factor

Reply
Miguel Moledo
5/14/2024 03:30:15 pm

This makes sense. But then does the Fire Water Storage Tank have to take account for Fire Flow shown on Table 18.4.4.2.1 of 2024 NFPA 1?

Reply
COLIN LUSHER
5/14/2024 03:52:11 pm

That depends. The water supplies in Chapter 18 are for Fire Department use, so that water would need to be accessible to the Fire Department through a fire hydrant. Is your tank supplying fire department hydrants? If so, then yes, the tank would need to accommodate that. But in most cases, the answer would be no; if your tank isn't supplying fire department hydrants, then you don't need to include fire department demand from Chapter 18 in your tank size calculations.

Michael Christensen
5/14/2024 08:49:39 pm

I think of that table as the amount of water for exterior hoses for the fire department to fight a fire; rather than for a sprinkler system. This is the minimum(s) to build the building. Collin is correct that the table in 18.4.4.2.1 is for fire department and they, at least in the US, will draw the water from and use it in combination with their fire truck to apply the water to the fire. This tank and water volume does not automatically need to have a pump. For example if the municipality (city/town) has a tank on a hill/mountain/elevated it does not need to be pumped from the tank since the elevation (head) could be sufficient.
This is most commonly delivered to the project site through fire hydrants.
I have had projects where we had a cistern on site sized to accommodate the demand referenced in the table and we did this because it feed the hydrants around the buildings.




Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT