MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Typical Suppression Water Storage Tank Type?

3/31/2022

9 Comments

 
​We're looking at a fire protection system, Ordinary Hazard Group 2, that requires primary fire protection water from a storage tank.

We are looking at three options, (1) above ground insulated with a heater, (2) underground concrete and (3) underground fiberglass.

I am curious what the community here sees around the industry as being the most common choice here?

The job site already has substantial excavation going on and the job is located in the north east so freezing is a concern. There will be no private hydrant so we don't see the need to carry hose allowance in our tanks sizing.

​Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Alex
3/31/2022 07:42:38 am

Hi,

I would have this discussion with the owner and layout the pros and cons of each. If there is substantial excavation already occurring on the site, it might be worth while to use an underground tank. Personally, I have only installed above ground to keep the cost down (I am located in MA).

I'm assuming there is no inside hose requirement as well?

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Glenn Berger
3/31/2022 08:09:40 am

Ground-level bolted steel tank with insulation and heater if required for that location.

Reply
Jesse
3/31/2022 08:09:41 am

Texas here and we utilize above ground tanks almost exclusively unless there is a specific need for UG. We don't have the freeze risk you do, so clearly that's a large part of it.

Since you have a sizable excavation it makes it easy to consider UG. That may change the pump you choose if the fire pump is above the water supply as well.

Reply
Jack G
3/31/2022 08:23:40 am

I ve installed about 200 tanks over 57 years. From 10 k to 500 k gallons. Also A custom tank, 22 diameter by 85 ft high, that no one would touch. FM approved installation.
Installed bladder tanks and clay ponds with underground fire pump rooms.
No real answer. Depends on client and installation.
In my opinion:
Above ground is easiest. Ugliest.
Installing a concrete vault/tank is next easiest. ( vertical pump)
Fiberglass tank in a berm , 1/3 rd above ground was popular, next easiest .( horizontal or vertical pump)
Clay pond , underground pump room, for customers that wanted “ natural “ next. ( horizontal horizontal pump with high capacity sump pumps) dehumidification.
Hate doing bladder ponds.
I probably enjoyed the clay ponds best.
They now make a variable speed, constant voltage pump for golf course/ fire protection ponds. Did 2 of those. Customer saved a bunch of money!

Reply
Mike M
3/31/2022 08:51:39 am

Underground tanks are typically only seen at what I would call high value facilities. The added costs of excavating, building, and typically using a vertical lift style pump are all significant. Most normal jobs are aboveground metal tanks with heat. But we're typically talking an ESFR or storage occupancy or multiple buildings, so your options at the OH II level may look different due to the smaller capacity. I would definitely price out multiple options and see what makes sense if you have time.

Reply
David Toshio Williams
3/31/2022 09:08:27 am

Our frost depth is 6 feet here and we do some work on rural sites served by a well, so we need tanks. If at all possible I push for a fiberglass tank(s) located within the building foot print located under the fire pump room. Since the entire tank has to be below the frost line based on my reading of NFPA, the excavation cost (and allowable burial depth) is too high otherwise. I did have a sprinkler contractor VE to a concrete vault tank with a covering berm, but man is it ugly on a flat site. We have looked at in the building PE tanks, but the cost of the enclosed SF has usually been prohibitive. (Scott will probably mention that the MN Code allows high capacity wells to serve as a supply for a rural fire sprinkler system, but given the variability of well capacity, required large well diameter, hard rock in much of Minnesota, and the need to demonstrate flow every year, it seems like too much of a gamble.)

Reply
Brad K
3/31/2022 10:55:39 am

Bolted Steel ground storage tanks are 95% of our sprinkler projects as the economical path. We just finished our first insulated bolted steel tank. We where presently supersized how well and quickly it came together with a tried and true tank vendor. Heaters seem fairly strait forward with a bolted flange(s). We haven't been involved with any long term service yet on these. Ask a lot of questions of the vender to help the und user anticipate future maintenance for this option.

Reply
Chris Boyd
3/31/2022 12:46:40 pm

Would your AHJ consider foregoing the tank and connecting directly to a well provided it had a recent hydraulic analysis demonstrating sufficient flow ?

Reply
David Toshio Williams
3/31/2022 01:43:24 pm

Noting my concerns above, even if allowable by the AHJ, to actually achieve the flow required for a fire protection sprinkler system. If you don't already have a well you really won't know what a well will produce until it's drilled... if the flow is not possible, then you have thrown your money down a hole! (And usually you have to prove flow every year... wells sometimes are not that consistent!)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​April '22 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. The discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT