MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Total Flow - Hose Allowance for Feed Main Size?

9/1/2023

8 Comments

 
Ok, everyone, I've gotten myself really mixed up today. This is like one of those times where you're asking yourself "is this really how 'the' is spelled?"

This is for design intent calculations only.

When you do your friction loss calcs on an extra hazard group 2, a 0.40 gpm/2,500 sqft, are you using the total flow demand minus hose connection?

As an example, if I need to run 375 ft of pipe and I know that my most remote sprinkler requires 40 gpm (remember, this is only for design intent!) I am typically multiplying my distance by 1000 gpm for worst case scenario. The sprinkler contractors will do the detailed steps back to the nodes and mains.

Hopefully I can right myself back up. Just one of those weird times. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Dan Wilder
9/1/2023 07:37:04 am

In most cases, no hose allowance until you get back to the supply. So the last design intent calculation I saw went like this (modified for your numbers):

Density: .40
Area: 2500
Remote sprinkler: 11.2K - 12.8PSI - 40GPM
# of sprinklers - 25 (assuming 2500FT²/100FT²)
Total minimum flow: 25 * 40 = 1000 GPM
Assumed over discharge (20%) = 200 GPM
Total Flow = 1200 GPM
End sprinkler starting PSI = 12.8PSI
Elevation Loss to remote sprinkler (assuming 20') = 8.67PSI
Friction loss* (6" Sch 40) = 18.5 PSI
Check/Butterfly loss = 7 PSI

Total Required @ BOR = 1200 GPM @ 46.97 PSI
Total Required @ SRC = 1700 GPM @ 46.97 PSI**

**Insert added UG PSI losses as needed

*Meyer Fire Friction Loss Calculator
https://www.meyerfire.com/blog/fire-sprinkler-friction-loss-a-quick-calculator

TGIF!

Reply
Anthony
9/1/2023 08:07:32 am

This is how I do my "napkin" calculations as well.

Nice work, Dan!

Reply
Jesse
9/1/2023 10:29:17 am

What Dan said

Reply
Dan Wilder
9/1/2023 08:31:52 am

Also - plug for the Toolkit...it has many of these calculators to help out the process

https://www.meyerfire.com/toolkit.html

Reply
Jesse
9/1/2023 10:30:20 am

I emphatically second Dan's plug for the ToolKit. If you're not using it, you're cheating yourself. Thanks for creating this Joe!

Reply
Joe Meyer
9/1/2023 10:32:58 am

Wow - that means a lot, especially coming from you both - thank you for the endorsement!

Casey Milhorn
9/1/2023 08:53:28 am

Dan nailed it. It's amazing how many younger/newer designers can't do this. It's very important that estimators and designers are able to do a quick and dirty analysis like this. it can mean the difference of getting a RFI out day one of a signed contract, or 3 or 4 months into a contract when it gets a lot messier to tell someone they need a pump and/or tank. If I'm doing design intent for someone and it's close, that's when I take the time to pull a full calc together. On the delta flow (overage), I'll use anywhere from 5% for a gridded warehouse, to 50% or more for a dry attic. You have to account for the inefficiency of the system due to layout, weird elevation changes in your remote area, mixed K factors, etc.... that's where some people get in trouble with their design intent calcs.

Reply
Glenn Berger
9/1/2023 09:48:51 am

Way to go Dan!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT