MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Thoughts on Storz vs. Dual-Inlet Threaded FDC?

5/2/2023

19 Comments

 
From the perspective of a responder, any thoughts on using large diameter hose on a freestanding Storz FDC versus the old 2-1/2 inch standard two-inlet threaded fire department connection?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
19 Comments
Anthony
5/2/2023 07:09:35 am

1/2 as many hoses to connect. The threads don't get mangled by the general public.

Reply
Kyle
5/2/2023 08:05:41 am

Some areas already do this. Raleigh, NC and areas nearby do. Biggest thing to consider, when thinking about it from that point of view, is what the response plan/procedures dictate for the responding fire departments. Often times a quick phone call to the AHJ can provide some insight to the "why" they may operate that way as well.

Reply
DS
5/2/2023 08:06:56 am

The Storz is same size as our supply hose, no threads, better volume of water, single hose connection, 1/3 turn for securing.

Reply
Jesse
5/2/2023 08:11:59 am

I spent 20 years as a professional firefighter / officer before getting into the fire protection engineering world. The LDH to standpipe was a big push in the late 90s early 2000s, using the same logic we used in the 80s and 90s going from tin 3" supply lines to one 5"..

It didn't really pan out the way we thought it would. We all know we trade pressure for volume. With a combined hose allowance of 500-gpm, twin 2.5" or 3" lines are more than able to support that. And yeah, connecting one Storz connection as opposed to two 2.5" is easier, but time isn't necessarily critical and it is way easier to move 2.5" than 5"

Reply
Chad
5/2/2023 08:20:08 am

Nothing like tugging on 100'+ of 5" uphill, at night, around a corner.... yada...yada...yada

2- 3's is easier and faster 9/10 times.

Reply
chad
5/2/2023 08:14:10 am

2-1/2 threads are not usually damaged (in my experience, in a city) The whole thing yes but not just the threads. The storz caps are stolen for scrap and much more expensive than a disposable 2-1/2 one. and then get filled with trash faster because its such a big hole.

Most non highrise/tax payer/low rise buildings DA calc is less than 500GPM and a 3" line can feed that so even if one of the two are damaged, as long as the clapper seats you can work with it.

We require 2-1/2"s in the downtown and dense areas, more reliably capped and most systems do not require over 500GPM, even when including a single engine connected to the standpipes. We have found this more reliable, in our experience and its easier/quicker for the DVO to make the connection. We do have some larger buildings that do get storz based on the flow calcs.

In more rural areas I would understand if you only wanted Storz

Our large industrial have less of a theft of cap issue and I spec them there, and of course bigger flow requirements.

Reply
JP
5/2/2023 08:35:04 am

Hi,

When selecting which FDC configuration, it is important to contact the local fire department. Each jurisdiction usually picks one type of FDC and that type is applied almost universally throughout the jurisdiction for consistency with the fire department.

Maneuvering 2.5" hoses is substantially easier. Also, having one type of hose for the FDC and the same type of hose for inside the building at the standpipe can make for easier response from the fire department.

Reply
Aaron Easter
5/2/2023 08:45:54 am

I don’t see a clear “better” choice. I see pros and cons to both depending on what your tactics are. Norman FD uses the 5” Storz mounted on a 30° elbow for all new13 systems.

We have LDH with Storz and a threaded adapter for supply connections to hydrants (had ZipHuts originally). We also pump directly to our sticks with it. Quick connections are nice but humping hose is a full crew job over 100ft and impossible to reposition without draining.

Some have mentioned the pressure loss of LDH but here we don’t see much over idle sent to an FDC.

Reply
Mike
5/2/2023 08:59:22 am

That is a good question. There are legit reasons why both systems are better.

5 inch storz
Pros
1) Single hose to connect.

Cons -
1) Usually max operating pressure of 200psi on LDH. If head pressure is an issue, then you can bump the psi of a 2.5 / 3 inch line above 200psi, taking into account the friction loss of the appliances through the riser room, you would not be over 200 psi on the standpipe or sprinkler system.
2) If it fails you lose all water while putting a new line in place.

2@ 2.5 inch
Pros -
1) Higher operating pressure. You can push the pressure above 200 psi to maximize the pressure inside the building.
2) Rredundancy, if one line fails, interior teams still have water while line is replaced with a new line.
3) usually faster to get 1 line flowing but then you would be at partial volume.

Cons -
1) slower to get max capacity flowing into the building


I am sure I am missing something. Once you are started one way it is hard to change because old buildings are not going to change. So... consistency is good. :)

Reply
Casey Milhorn
5/2/2023 09:00:23 am

As others have said, definitely pros and cons. We are in an area where it's a mixed bag. That concerns me because if we were to have a mass fire event (think of a terrorist attack by way of arson on multiple buildings) and other local departments had to respond, they may not have the proper hook ups on the trucks. I'm in favor of choosing one or the other for an entire state or area.

Reply
John
5/2/2023 09:33:18 am

Hello,
We typically go with 21/2 FDCs for 13Rs and our 5in Stortz for other commercial structures.

A couple of other things we considered:

What would the system support need be should, for example a fire pump failed.

We also look at what the FDC footing is capable of supporting in retrofit situations.

Reply
David Kendrick
5/2/2023 10:06:09 am

Can anyone explain the UL listing for the Storz connections?

From my understanding on National Hose Thread connections where there is a threaded plug at the connection. The the plug is unscrewed. There is the possibility to discover and relieve pressure slowly if there is a Fire Department Connection check valve leaking by. If sensible caps are in place the bypass leak will already show.

Storz connections being a twist lock do not have the same properties. Pressure relief is immediate.

Checking manufacturers that list a Storz connection with a UL listing qualify that certification with purchasing both the connection and the cap.

Maybe the cap has a weep hole.

Reply
Chad
5/2/2023 10:26:43 am

I've seen some Storz caps that have a small hole drilled in the center, assumed for that reason, we do not ask for it and its not factory. If there is a ball drip (installed properly) on the FDC line, that should not happen with a slowly leaking check valve. Of course I don't want to take a 5" cap off with 100psi behind it either, if I could even get it to budge.

Reply
Alex
5/2/2023 12:30:59 pm

I personally look at FDC location and accessibility. If the FDC is close to a capable location for an apparatus to park, then Storz. If you are up a hill, behind a few fences, or a ways away, 2 2-1/2" outlets would be preferred.

Make sure your storz connection matches the hose/fittings on the trucks! When my company still carried 4", we had a 5" storz installed.

Thanks

Reply
Pete H
5/2/2023 03:01:23 pm

From a responder perspective? Storz rules. The threads don't get mangled, single hose is easier to tap into and use.

But it requires a fire department that is set up to use it. Same as a threaded FDC (hence the difference in thread types on FDC. Out here we have NST threads and NY Corps threads). So having a 4" hose for a 5" Storz connection is useless.

Consult your local Fire Department and match the local threads or hoses that they have. If they're outfitted for Storz, go for it.

Reply
Richard Harrod
5/3/2023 01:25:09 pm

Here are my two cents....
As a career firefighter with 20 on the job, I see both sides and all the comments above are valid. With that said, if the 4" or 5" supply line fails, which will happen, you have to shut down and replace the section that failed. If your hooking in 2 lines instead of 1, then that aspect of shutting down completely is null and void. You can secure the section that fails while continuing to flow into the system. My choice will always be the pair just for redundancy purposes. At 2 or 3 in the morning, when youre rubbing the sleep from your eyes, I say no to "Murphy".
Make sense?

Reply
EJ
5/3/2023 02:02:04 pm

I heard that NFPA is going to start limiting the flow thru a storz to 500 gpm for a 4" and 750 gpm for a 5". So I guess we'll see FDC's that area siamese storz?

Reply
Robert
5/3/2023 10:04:14 pm

In all jurisdictions of which I have been an inspector it has been a requirement for storz fittings on all FDC’s.

Reply
Steven W Dube link
5/24/2023 02:04:00 pm

Hudson Fire has always used 4" Stortz, with a 30 degree down adapter

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT