MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Tank Size, Options for Sprinkler System Supply?

8/3/2021

12 Comments

 
We have a fire sprinkler system with a 550 gpm total sprinkler demand (including hose allowances). The supply duration is 60 minutes. There is no city water supply and we are only utilizing a storage tank.

Is the tank required to have a minimum capacity of 33,000 gallons?

Or, could we rely on fire department response, potentially reduce the tank size, and have a manual fire department connection for tank refill?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
Pete
8/3/2021 06:47:32 am

I might be out of my depth here, but I'm seeing nothing in NFPA 22 even suggesting the idea of a manual refill or fdc connection to a tank. I can't imagine the FDC would be considered listed for such an application.

So yeah, I'm inclined to say you're getting a 33,000 gallon tank (or 40,000 based on standard sizing.)

Reply
Glenn Berger
8/3/2021 08:19:19 am

Your question said that there is no city water supply. To me this implies that the project is located remotely from any municipality that has any type of reliable water supply.

I would strongly recommend to provide at least the minimum, if not something more robust. I would not recommend decreasing the water supply.

Reply
Michael Newell
8/3/2021 08:21:12 am

It would be based in my opinion on worst case scenario. If you do not have a water supply you could in theory be required to have fire fighting water storage as well. But this would potentially increase tank size depending on system and demand instead of reducing it. I wouldn't think the AHJ would allow you to reduce the system demand below what is required for your system duration.

Reply
Roland lopez
8/3/2021 08:21:57 am

Based on NFPA 13 & 20. It is required for your safety. You can reduce the tank size if proximity of Fire department is very near and will not take a longer time to response… say within 10 minutes arrival of fire department. Immediate source of water is essential in supressing fire.

Reply
schulman
8/3/2021 08:24:26 am

with no "city water supply" you'd get approximately one minutes worth of water from a pumper truck ... FYI ...

"... Key components of a fire engine include: Water tank (usually 500-750 gallons)..."

Reply
MattC
8/3/2021 08:49:36 am

If you can prove that the fire department response is really fast, and the department has tanker/shuttle accreditation then this may warrant or justify the reduction in tank sizing. Of course you're at the mercy of the AHJ and they likely want as much water on-site as possible.

The reality is that if you're excavating for an existing building or building a brand new building anyway, then the cost of increased tank sizes or even additional tanks is negligible, in my opinion. You should still have a fill port or at least a hatch either way if the tanks are below-grade.

Typically the fire dept does not fill the tanks at all during fireground operations. They would simply shuttle water in from a filling station using a water tanker (this is not the same as an engine, as it carries substantially more water) but are typically already filled in the station. At the fire scene, suppression staff would set up what is essentially a pool which they draft water out of. In instances where a large quantity of water is needed, multiple of these can be connected together for increased storage capacity. The tankers then simply go out, fill, return and dump into the pools, while the pumper or engine on-scene would draft from here and use this water for firefighting operations.

Also, most jurisdictions should allow you to omit the outside hose allowance, assuming there's no draft hydrant connected to the tanks. Make sure if your building doesn't have standpipe that you're also not including inside hose allowance. This will help reduce your demand and therefore reduce tank sizes.

Reply
Anonymous
8/5/2021 07:33:56 pm

That last part was very helpful, thank you

Reply
CJ Bonczyk
8/3/2021 08:50:54 am

We have ran into this before. If no supply connection is available for the refill rate to be reduced then the tank is required to be sized for total demand at the duration required. If the refill rate cannot be refilled within 8 hours per NFPA 22 a variance from the fire department can be requested to where they will connect their mobile tank truck (if the department has one) to help with supply refill once on scene.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
8/3/2021 09:19:59 am

Yes, full amount with no reduction. Also as someone else mentioned there should probably be the conversation about IFC fire flow if any draft hydrant or private hydrants are to be fed from the tank. A good compromise would be to add a draft hydrant on the tank, size up to 40,000 gallons, and the fire department at least has a little extra in there for drafting from the tank. From the sound of the demand, you might be ordinary hazard group 1 or 2. Make sure the building has offsite monitoring of fire alarm so that you can truly use the 60 minute duration. Also, if there is no draft hydrant or private hydrants, you could argue that the hose allowance is not needed but again a draft hydrant would probably be a good idea anyway.

Reply
Franck
8/3/2021 04:37:01 pm

Insurance point of view : not acceptable (as many other point of views above)
There is no reliability if you do not have the required volume for the required period. There is no warranty that the outside fire department (outside company) would fill the tank.
If it was an automatic refill with sufficient flow, that would be acceptable, but in no way a manual refill from a fire department would be considered acceptable.
As already said by other above, the fd has already other many “much more important” duties.

Reply
Alex
8/4/2021 06:59:25 am

Anonymous,

NFPA 22 (2018) 4.1.6 states that a “tank shall be sized so that the stored supply plus reliable automatic refill shall meet the system demand for the design duration”. It is my interpolation of the code that a reliable automatic refill is referring to a city/town water system, not the fire department.

In my town, each engine has roughly 1,000 gallons of water onboard. This water is used for handlines or the deck gun and would not be used to refill the tank. As mentioned in previous responses, for a rural area with no hydrants, a shuttle system would need to be set up. This takes valuable time when initial suppression of the fire is required. In addition, many rural departments have on-call firefighters, which already decreases response time.

In the end, it would be up to AHJ to make the final call. I would recommend calling the fire department to determine their SOP (standard operating procedure) for structures similar to yours.
Best of luck with your design.

Alex

Reply
jim williams link
10/4/2025 11:58:21 am

the architect shows two 20,000 gal fire and combination domestic water tanks, the domestic water demand can average around 12 thousand gallons in the morning. my second question is can the same tanks be used for domestic and fire supply???

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT