MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
    • [THE ALL-NEW SITE]
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Strainer Allowed in 10-Diameter Suction of Pump?

2/24/2023

11 Comments

 
For a horizontal split case fire pump, 10 pipe diameters of straight pipe is to be provided for the suction inlet.

My design includes a gate valve and strainer within the 10 pipe diameters.

Is the strainer allowable in this range?

I'm unable to find in NFPA 20 any input on this. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Dan Wilder
2/24/2023 07:04:28 am

While not specifically called out, the intent is to provide laminar flow to the pump via the 10 diameters of straight pipe with the correct orientation of elbows/tees when installed to the centerline of the pump.

If items like a check valve or a butterfly valve are prohibited due to the nature of water disruption across the valve, that same disruption of water flow through a strainer would also be anticipated and should be avoided even if not specifically called out.

NFPA 20-22' Ed - 4.29.3 Devices in Suction Piping.
Where located in the suction pipe of the pump, check valves and backflow prevention devices or assemblies shall be located a minimum of 10 pipe diameters from the pump suction flange.

Reply
Glenn Berger
2/24/2023 08:13:27 am

The 10 pipe diameters needs to be maximized as much as possible without the presence of any device which can cause a non-laminar flow condition.

IMO, the strainer shall not be placed within the 10 pipe diameter zone prior to the pump suction.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
2/24/2023 08:31:14 am

I agree with Dan and Glenn, and just to be clear, there is NOT an issue with a vertical change of direction for elbows/tees within 10 pipe diameters of the suction. This only applies to elbows/tees that create a change of direction in a horizontal fashion.

Reply
Koray link
2/24/2023 08:39:38 am

10 pipe diameters straight suction pipe rule that is specifically for horizontal split case fire pumps is not because of turbulent flow concern, it is because of pressure difference on both sides of the impeller that may ruin the pump.
Since there is no clapper in strainers, like in butterfly valves, check valves or backflow preventers that can cause turbulent flow, i think it is ok to use it on a suction line

Reply
Casey Milhorn
2/24/2023 09:00:01 am

I think turbulence is too broad of a term here. It would be more in line with air entrainment or cavitation. You could probably argue that the strainer "could" cause one or both of these conditions.

Reply
Alex
2/24/2023 09:32:37 am

I agree with others this morning, I would not instal the strainer within the 10’.

Reply
Jess Lutz
2/24/2023 09:40:48 am

My advice would be to tread carefully, as it could be a high-risk decision $$$$.
So many questions immediately come to mind:

Why can't the strainer be moved to allow the 10ft?
What happens if the AHJ doesn't allow it?
Have you consulted with the AHJ?
Is this scenario approved by the PUMP manufacturer??
What are the implications if you need to relocate it at the 11th hour?

The persons responsible for the design (Engineer or Contractor) must work to get these answers.

Reply
SCHULMAN
2/24/2023 09:56:32 am

If the strainer does its job and traps something within 10' of the suction side of the pump wouldn't that be as bad as a valve clapper? .. create pressure differential on both sides of the impeller?

Reply
Derrick
2/24/2023 11:12:07 am

My personal opinion is that it would be ok, but I would try to to put it furthest away from the pump suction as possible. I definitely would check to see if it’s ok with the AHJ.
I’ve added a duplex strainer inside 10 pipe diameters before due to space restraints and there have been no issues.
I would also check with the pump manufacturer, strainer manufacturer, and the hydraulic institute standard for rotodynamic pump…I think it’s ANSI/HI 9.6 maybe. It has a lot of suction pump piping requirements…up to AHJ though. Make sure you have the justification and data ready when you present to the AHJ

Reply
Franck
2/25/2023 02:00:24 am

I would be very cautious with anything located on the suction side susceptible to create unbalanced flow, turbulences, caviation, blockage...

If 10 x diameter is fine for horizontal elbows or check valves and backflow preventers. A butterfly valve is not allowed at less than 50 ft (whatever the size of the piping) !

This being said, how should we characterize a strainer ?

I quite agree to the fact that 10 x diameter would be fine, as for backflow preventer, all the more since strainers are quite often provided at the suction inlet (screen), with no specific requirement.

Some comments state that they were installed at less distance with no issue.
This is also true for butterfly valves, upside down eccentric reduction, horizontal elbows very close to suction side of the pump...
It works well, until it fails !
These requirements are for reliability purposes and to limit early aging of the pump impeller.
I have seen pumps with many unfavourable factors on the suction side and performing well for years, and others with strong degradations within a 10 year period. Situation is different from one facility to the other (and depends on water quality - raw water or clean water - materiual quality for the impeller, size of the equipment...).

At the end, the most important thing is that the pump is able to deliver the flow and pressure that are required.
Regular testing of fire pump characteristics can help to ensure that the duty is done (it has to be done at least annually up to 150% of the nominal flow of the pump).
And the regular testing can also help to make preventive maintenance on due time and replace the impeller, if needed, before the situation is not good anymore (don't forget to correct the obtained value to the rotational speed for diesel pumps, as a pump operating at a higher speed than nominal can look "good", while it is only "good" because it rotates quicker...).

If there is no other solution than to provide an odd arrangement, this has to be validated by the AHJ, but it might not be a "real issue" for the purpose of the pump (as long as minimum requirements are fullfilled).
It will be anyway a deviation from NFPA 20 standard and has to be be mentionned for later reference.

But again, this is my practical point of view, and in no way an argument against the standard requirements and its application.
I often make recommendations when I find these odd situations on existing installations.
In Europe, for example, it is quite common to have a butterfly valve instead of a gate valve on the suction side, or elbow n the horizontal plane very close to the pump suction side.
While it is possible to change the valve, it is somehow impossible to correct the issue with the elbow. But this is documented in my report and I warn them about a possible early aging and necessity to regularly check the pump characteristics.

Reply
Phil Watkins
2/26/2023 03:08:35 am

I'd say the intent from NFPA 20 is not to have strainers on suction pipes for centrifugal pumps whether in a 10x NB location or otherwise. If you do fit them, I think you would have to make assumptions in your calculations for the strainer to be clogged.

Relevant sections below.

4.16.9.1 – No device or assembly unless identified in 4.16.9.2 that will stop, restrict the starting of, or restrict the discharge of a fire pump or pump driver shall be installed in the suction piping.

4.16.9.2 (4) – Suction strainers shall be permitted to be installed in the suction piping where required by other sections of this standard.

Chapter 8 describes requirements for positive displacement pumps; paragraph 8.5.5 requires a suction strainer (so not applicable if you have a centrifugal pump)

Chapter 7 describes requirement for vertical shaft turbine pumps; paragraph 7.3.4 requires a suction strainer (not applicable if you have a centrifugal pump)

A strainer in the suction line should not be required because the water supply to the fire water tank should be clean filtered and in any case flushed before it enters the fire water tank.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​August '23 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
    • [THE ALL-NEW SITE]
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT