Has anyone been asked to or required to provide sprinkler protection for at grade parking with PV panels overtop?
I've been looking online for what has been done in other jurisdictions but I can't find much. There is a lot of discussion about whether PV panels constitute a roof or not for parking garages, but my question is more along the lines of has there been research done to determine if the sprinklers can be expected to activate properly based on pitch/spacing? Thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Pete H
3/7/2024 06:54:11 am
I think research is ongoing.
Reply
Anthony
3/7/2024 07:04:59 am
Spacing - per the hazard you're protecting in the environment you're protecting. Treat each solar panel as a partial roof/cloud/obstruction. I think you're looking at OH2 for parking structures now so 130 sqft. if the panels are all plastic then its combustible construction if they're all encased in metal then its non-combustible.
Reply
3/7/2024 08:43:22 am
PV systems installed on roofs are now usually required to have rapid shutdown, a method of mitigating the hazard of live wires on the roof where an electronic module will shut the power "off" at the panel.
Reply
Jesse
3/7/2024 08:53:25 am
Seems like you're neck deep in one of the issues currently plaguing NFPA. Right up there with EVs and Li-ion batteries.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
3/7/2024 11:15:56 am
The adopted scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2021) determines WHERE an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) is required to be installed based on the building’s Occupancy Classification(s) (OC) and/or Specific Building Areas and Hazards (per IBC-2021 903.2.11).
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
3/7/2024 11:16:29 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Franck
3/7/2024 12:13:36 pm
Normally you put sprinklers under a roof so that a fire could not spread and damage it.
Reply
Max
3/7/2024 04:39:02 pm
I required PV panels to be listed. The structure supporting the panels is not considered a roof per the IBC. The structure is not there to provide protection from the elements, does not enclose the space, and usually does not span from side to side. So it does not meet the definition of a roof. Therefore, I classify these as rooftop structures which generally do not require sprinklers. Just my 0.02.
Reply
3/12/2024 05:56:00 am
Sprinklers (water based) to provide cover for incidents around an electrical system does not sound like the right approach. There is a solution that de-energises all PV systems by delivering a temporary light blocking liquid coating to the panels, stopping the energy generation at source. The coating then dries and can be peeled off the panels when safe to do so, restoring the system without damaging it. A simple, safe and effective solution to a complicated challenge.
Reply
Danny
10/29/2024 05:33:27 pm
I have encountered this on a project, where the AHJ wanted PV canopies on a parking lot greater than 5000sf to be sprinklered. We just re-designed the array to stay under the 5000sf limit, with a 10' gap between them. I think this was specific to Santa Clara county, CA, but I can't recall if it was the building department, or Fire that pulled it out of their ass.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Feb '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
March 2025
PE PREP SERIES |