MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinklers in "Reverse" Ceiling Pockets for 13D?

11/28/2023

11 Comments

 
I'm reviewing a fire sprinkler system under 2019 NFPA 13D for a single family dwelling.

The living room basically has "reverse" ceiling pockets as the pockets are lower than the rest of the ceiling (pockets are at 10'-7", the ceiling is at 12'-1").

They have 2 sprinklers in each of the 3 lower sections of the ceiling but no sprinklers in the higher areas (except for a room to the side but in the same area).

It seems off to me to omit sprinklers in the higher area but can't figure out how to apply a code to it.

Would you apply the ceiling pocket rule if the higher area exceeds 100 cubic feet or is it fine as designed?
Picture

​Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Anthony
11/28/2023 07:36:27 am

I think you need to add 3 sprinklers. 1 to each "reverse pocket," generally I'd call these clouds. Then space the other sprinklers around the clouds such that you don't have any dead spots over 15ft^2. See NFPA 13D 2019 8.2.5.7.

Reply
Glenn Berger
11/28/2023 08:11:21 am

Additional sprinklers are required. I typically use the position of the deflector with respect to the ceiling clause.

Reply
James Evans
11/28/2023 08:16:27 am

As allowed by NFPA 13D, as long as the volume does not exceed 100 cubic feet then the sprinklers in the high area are not required. Even in NFPA 13 if the change in elevation does not exceed 3'-0" you are allowed to space sprinklers as if the elevation change is not there. The sprinkler spacing you are showing does not exceed the area for a residential sprinkler, so in my opinion if the volume does not exceed 100 cubic feet then they are fine.

Also remember that NFPA 13D's goal is to save lives not property. the sprinklers are designed to wet walls to slow a fire to allow for escape. Although in most cases it does extinguish the fire.

Reply
Mickey
11/28/2023 08:33:26 am

Are they using standard spray sprinklers or residential sprinklers? It's odd that the 2019 Edition of 13D does not mention a maximum depth of the pocket requirement. NFPA 13 has a 36" maximum for standard spray and 12" maximum for residential sprinklers.

Reply
Jesse
11/28/2023 08:35:03 am

Its difficult to tell. I don't think the combined volume of the higher areas would require protection.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
11/28/2023 08:50:52 am

What Anthony said. Shift the heads north and south out of the lower ceilings, and add 3 heads, (1) in each lower ceiling area (watch out for that fan though). Not sure what your water supply is, but also seems like heads are spaced at 14'x14' or 16'x16'. If you don't have a volume or pressure issue, max those things out to 20'x20' and save heads in other areas possibly. The upper right area seems like it should only need 1 sprinkler from left to right. If you are working through a 3/4" meter, then forget what I said and keep them at 14'x14' to avoid exceeding listed gpm rating on meter. If you have a full 1" meter, or pump and tank setup, max those heads out.

Reply
Michael
11/28/2023 08:51:45 am

I think you would consider these ceiling pockets.

Reply
Alex
11/28/2023 09:58:50 am

I'm swaying more on the side of adding heads in the higher ceiling.

From the picture, wouldnt the upper pocket exceed 100 SF?

Reply
Peter Googins
11/28/2023 10:48:12 am

I agree. Just the little two areas between the drop ceiling (rough guestimation) 2ftx2ftx14=56 cu ft, times that by two is 112 cu ft?

Reply
DE
11/28/2023 12:05:43 pm

What Anthony and Casey said. Unprotected volume definitely exceeds 100cuft. Sprinklers required in the 12'-1" ceiling.

Just my opinion but I wouldn't even apply the ceiling pocket section as the higher ceiling is the main ceiling, not the 10'-7" one and it's not really "bounded". Check the definition.

Regardless of life safety or property protection, sprinklers need to be positioned according to the standard.

To address the other comments, standard spray sprinklers are not permitted for this application under NFPA 13D.

Reply
Dan Wilder
11/28/2023 11:01:51 pm

The NFPA definition of a ceiling pocket is : An architectural ceiling feature that consists of a bounded area of ceiling located at a higher elevation than the attached lower ceiling.

This picture, as illustrated, does not comply with that definition so it just becomes the higher ceiling with a lower obstruction that looks to exceed 48". As there isn't room to move far enough horizontally away from the obstruction (Table 8.2.5.3.2), it's not located directly against a wall (i8.2.5.3.3 & it's over 30" anyway), and adding a sprinkler to the other side of the obstruction is still not in compliance (8.2.5.3.4 & with Table 8.2.5.3.2) a sprinkler would be required at the lower elevation in addition to the upper level sprinklers.

There are a couple NFSA EOD answers I can reference in the morning if they apply (I only have the PDF Handbook Index at hand)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT