MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinkler System Supported Only by Pipe Stands?

3/15/2024

8 Comments

 
I have an existing penthouse that has limited (no) access to the structure at the roof and requires sprinkler coverage. We have a variance from the AHJ to omit sprinklers from non accessible areas.

Has anyone designed a sprinkler system supported from the floor entirely by pipe stands or pipe racks?

I'm aware of the requirements of NFPA 13-16 CH 9.1.1.2.
Picture
The structural engineer on my project is not eager to get involved so alternative options especially pre-engineered options would be great. I'll push back if there aren't better options but looking for any advice.

​I'm also aware of NFPA 13-22 CH 17.5 however 8-0'' tall pipe stands don't seem especially stable. Preferably I'd like a Unistrut solution a contractor can assemble in field and place as required say every 10-0'' ( see pictures)


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Craig Hanson link
3/15/2024 08:43:45 am

If they use unistrut they have to use half straps or U-bolts. Unistrut pipe clamps (those two piece straps you see on plumbing and electrical) are not UL listed for sprinkler piping. They are ok for drain and test piping, but cannot be used on system piping.

As for the rest of it, it has to be engineered as per chapter 9 and braced, not just thrown together.

Reply
DE
3/15/2024 08:52:05 am

We've had to do it something like that before but not at that height.

AHJ requested protection under cannabis grow tables that were fixed in place and over 4'-0 wide.

We used a PF651 reversible channel bracket and a PF1100 rigid pipe clamp to attach the pipe to the bracket. The bracket was used as a "stanchion"

The bracket was attached to the concrete floor using drop-in anchors, hex bolts and washers.

This is NOT a listed method to do this so definitely get approvals.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
3/15/2024 09:24:39 am

“We have a variance from the AHJ to omit sprinklers from non accessible areas.”

I recommend getting this “variance” in writing from the AHJ as subsequent plan reviewers and/or inspectors may cite this as non-compliant based on the applicable scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2021) and the referenced standard (e.g. NFPA 13-2022).

NFPA 13-2022 Section 9.2 contains a consolidated list of (18) specific locations where sprinklers can be OMITTED and “non-accessible areas” is not one of these (unless it is referring to “Concealed Spaces.”)

The AHJ (IBC : Building Official) is “authorized and directed to enforce the provisions” of the Code, “render interpretations” of the Code, and “adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions.” These policies and procedures shall “not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for” in this Code, however. The AHJ, per IBC-2021 104.10 Modifications, is permitted to “grant modifications for individual cases” where there are “practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions” of the Code.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
3/15/2024 09:25:05 am

REFERENCES
NFPA 13 - 2022
CHAPTER 9 Sprinkler Location Requirements
9.2 Allowable Sprinkler Omission Locations.

ENHANCED CONTENT
Section 9.2 contains a consolidated list of specific locations where sprinklers can be omitted. It was developed to consolidate all the specific allowances that were scattered throughout Chapter 8 of the 2016 edition.

Section 9.2 can be expected to be a very active part of NFPA 13 during future revision cycles. It is the one section where the basic principle of NFPA 13—that sprinklers must be installed throughout the premises—is allowed to be altered. During each code development cycle, the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria acts on inputs and comments seeking to “excuse” a specific portion of a building from the requirements of sprinkler protection due to a special situation. The case is typically made that, under certain conditions, the presence of sprinklers does not provide any greater protection, and the omission of sprinklers in those specific areas and spaces within a building should be permitted. (Section 9.3 identifies those spaces and conditions.)

It is important to note the following two points regarding Section 9.2:

It is imperative that when the elimination of sprinklers from a space based on Section 9.2 is being considered, the space must comply exactly with the description and requirements found within the applicable paragraph(s). In other words, any deviation from the description in an applicable paragraph negates its application, and, as a result, the space must be sprinklered.
If a space is not specifically detailed in Section 9.2, it is intended to be protected by sprinklers under 9.1.1(1).

9.2.1* Concealed Spaces Not Requiring Sprinkler Protection.
9.2.2 Spaces Under Ground Floors, Exterior Docks, and Exterior Platforms.
9.2.3* Exterior Projections.
9.2.4 Dwelling Units.
9.2.5 Closets and Pantries.
9.2.6* Electrical Equipment Rooms.
9.2.7 Cloud Ceilings.
9.2.8 Revolving Doors Enclosures.
9.2.10 Small Temporarily Occupied Enclosures.
9.2.12 Noncombustible Vertical Shafts.
9.2.13 Noncombustible Stairways.
9.2.14 Elevator Hoistways and Machine Rooms.
9.2.15 Duct Protection.
9.2.16 Open-Grid Ceilings.
9.2.17 Drop-Out Ceilings.
9.2.18 Skylights.

IBC-2021
Chapter 1 Scope and Administration
Section 104 Duties and Powers of Building Official
104.1 General
The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this code. The building official shall have the authority to render interpretations of this code and to adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies and procedures shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of this code. Such policies and procedures shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this code.
104.10 Modifications
Where there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the building official shall have the authority to grant modifications for individual cases, upon application of the owner or the owner's authorized agent, provided that the building official shall first find that special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical, the modification is in compliance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen health, accessibility, life and fire safety or structural requirements. The details of action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the department of building safety.

Reply
David Williams
3/15/2024 09:36:54 am

Unistrut has an engineered design group that could handle structural design if needed. They are often called on for OR equipment supports and the like.

Reply
Jack G
3/15/2024 09:41:36 am

I ve used pipe stands on exposure systems around transformers as outlined in exposure protection phamplet. I m sure if provuded simularley they would be acceptable.
At six flags, the log jam ride, the platform rotates 360 degrees all day. At the jackson nj locatikn, over 38 years ago we installed sprinklers inside the 5 foot clear space. ( and its still standing )
So I dont think pipestands if appropriately installed are a problem for an entire systrm.
Opinion.

Reply
Jesse
3/15/2024 09:47:52 am

Lots of good comments about Unistrut and their engineered design group. We done things similar to this (though not at this scale) for protecting freezers / coolers outside of a restaurant. They might be able to help.

I really want to reinforce what Todd said about getting the variance in writing. We had a project where a fire marshal and the fire chief agreed to something so far outside the norm of NFPA 13 and NFPA 20 it boggled my mind. And then both left to go to another AHJ. Get it in writing

Reply
RYAN HINSON
3/15/2024 09:55:55 am

Consider getting AHJ buyoff on using NFPA 15 (2022) Standard and Annex Sections 6.3.2 for pipe supports and system stability bracing requirements. We use this often for similar applications.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT