Can you run sprinkler pipe underground after the riser has entered the building?
The building we're working on is an apartment building that is being sprinklered to NFPA 13R (2016 Edition). The apartment is 4-story and has open air breezeways. There are dry sidewalls protecting the breezeways. The owner wants to run pipe under the slab in the open air breezeways instead of providing a heated path for sprinkler pipe across the breezeway. I have strongly recommended against this, but have gotten pushback from the owner and contractor regarding this pipe arrangement. Is this underground arrangement allowed? I believe there are some cases where this is acceptable but not many. Thanks in advance! Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Alex
12/9/2021 07:00:04 am
Hi,
Reply
Anthony
12/9/2021 07:41:38 am
From 13R 2016 ed:
Reply
Glenn Berger
12/9/2021 08:25:03 am
Whether or not it is explicitly permitted, your specific project may require it. I would recommend to do anything possible to avoid. But when necessary, proceed with caution.
Reply
Aaron Baumgartner
12/9/2021 08:54:51 am
Hello,
Reply
Danial Bartle
12/9/2021 09:00:00 am
I have not worked with 13R, but if the auxiliary drains requirements (more than 5 gallons) and the 5-year inspection requirements for MIC (NFPA 25)are similar to 13, I would imagine it would be costly and difficult to perform those properly and may be they way to prevent the underground installation.
Reply
Pete H
12/9/2021 09:39:26 am
Similar to the rest, I don't see anywhere where it's specifically forbidden. Follow Chapter 10 of NFPA 13 and NFPA 24 for all rules about underground pipe. I'd still call your local AHJ and give them the heads up that you're kind of tied to that unusual installation to smooth things over in advance.
Reply
Jesse
12/9/2021 09:46:19 am
There are a lot of reasons NOT to run sprinkler pipe (downstream of the check valve) underground. To protect it from corrosion, you'll probably need to use typical UG pipe so ensure that the appropriate C-factor is used in calcs. You also have the obvious inspection issues.
Reply
Joe
12/9/2021 10:22:38 am
I am very familiar with your situation. We have installed NFPA-13R systems in many multi-family residential buildings that have these open exterior breezeways which separates the buildings into many smaller buildings but covered by the same roof. Piping overhead is not an easy option. Due to the building code and fire rated separations the builder must maintain, they cannot create a heated chase across the breezeways, either on lower floors or attic without creating a fire rated enclosure, and in doing so would prevent heat from the soffit area you are trying to condition or protect.
Reply
sean
12/9/2021 10:53:01 am
Permitted but everything about it is more complicated.
Reply
Jack G
12/9/2021 01:16:44 pm
Cgapter 8 , 13, allows interconnection of breezeways from one service. Chapter 10 has a bunch of qualifiers, one if which is running more than 10 ft within a building. It is , underground, the best way to do this. 13 describes an accessable trench. What i ve gotton approved in the past is the underground slab portion of the trench is poured last, so the location is identified easily. I use rods to mark the joints( can be found with a parking lot magnant). In case of separation.
Reply
Nick P
12/16/2021 11:27:48 am
The previous post from Joe is what we typically see as well.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop September '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
November 2024
PE PREP SERIES |