MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About
Picture
A FORUM FOR FIRE PROTECTION QUESTIONS & PE EXAM PROBLEMS | SUBSCRIBE NOW

Sprinkler Main Larger than Underground Size OK?

7/14/2020

15 Comments

 
Have a situation I've never crossed before: we have a very small building that's getting expanded. Originally the sprinkler contractor gave two options for the general contractor to price their underground fire sprinkler service - (1) is to provide a 2-1/2" main, the other (2) is to provide fire barriers in certain areas with automatic door closers to allow the room design method be used, and bring in a 2" underground.

I completely recognize that small underground pipe is not good practice and limits the future potential of the building. We recommended a 4-inch underground, but the increased cost for tap fees and underground pricing added $10-15,000 to the job which the owner adamantly refused.

We were given notice to proceed with 2-1/2" underground and thus provided a 2-1/2" riser and 2-1/2" mains. 

The GC gave a different direction for the underground and pulled 2" underground and is providing fire barriers and automatic door closers.

We've recalculated using the room design method and everything still works with the 2" underground, but the 2-1/2" riser and 2-1/2" main is already ordered and on the way to the jobsite.

Does NFPA 13 have any restriction against having a larger riser or main size than the underground?

Because of the change in building construction, we only need a 2" riser and 2" main but will instead already have prefabricated 2-1/2" in both. My thought is to have a permanent placard clearly affixed to the riser showing the situation and clearly identify on as-builts the methodology used.

​​​​Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
15 Comments
Jesse
7/14/2020 10:09:50 am

You have a problem.

The lead-in can not be smaller than the riser. Typically, underground can not be smaller than 6-in, but 13 makes a provision for smaller if A) no hydrants are attached to it, and B) it is no smaller than the riser.

I wouldn't stamp that drawing. Sorry, I know that's not what you hoped to read

Reply
Dustin
7/14/2020 10:22:34 am

Please provide code reference.

Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
7/14/2020 10:28:34 am

Regarding provision "B)",13-16 24.1.3.2 (2) only adds the not smaller than the riser provision if the system is not hydraulically calculated.

Reply
TC Lambert
7/14/2020 10:32:06 am

Being curious, as I have come up against situations like this here and there, I looked at NFPA 13. This limitation on the UG pipe size being at least as large as the riser is only for pipe schedule systems. If it can be proved by hydraulic calcs that the system demands can be satisfied you should be fine. That being said, I don't like the small UG size either. Since the GC has stacked the deck against you, I would push for an ample safety factor to be included in those calcs.

Reply
SUBMITTER
7/14/2020 10:34:23 am

Section 24.1.3.2 (2) is saying that the underground is at least as large as the system riser. That's only for pipe schedule systems - this system is hydraulically calculated.

Also, there are no hydrants connected to it and it is a dedicated sprinkler feed (no domestic).

SUBMITTER
7/14/2020 10:41:10 am

I wouldn't sign/seal the drawing either - if it wasn't code allowed.

The question (at least in my mind) isn't whether it's good practice to have an underground that's smaller than a main. It's not good practice and it doesn't lend itself to future building changes.

The question to me is whether it's allowed by code, and if hydraulically it can suppress a fire under the NFPA 13 standard.

As far as I can tell, despite the pickle the GC has us in, is that it would be allowed by code and does work hydraulically.

Ironically, if the main and riser is all 2-inch instead of 2-1/2-inch, then this discussion kind of goes away and the whole thing starts to look more traditional. That CAN actually work in this situation hydraulically - it's just that we already have the pipe cut at the larger 2-1/2 inch size. It's a goofy arrangement, no doubt, but being unconventional here really is only helping the situation hydraulically.

With the Room Design Method, 2-inch underground, and 2-1/2 inch main, we're sitting at a 12 psi (19.6%) safety factor.

Reply
Rusty Scott
7/14/2020 10:15:49 am

I've seen this before with warehouse risers where 6" underground is provided but in order to make the calc's work, a 8" riser is used and then sometimes transitions back to 6" on the horizontal. This would be the difference in bumping up the branch lines over the gridded system which is $$$. So I believe it is allowed due to code not explicitly stating against it (at least I haven't seen a code against it, doesn't mean it's not there), I believe it's more or less just not considered best practice.

Sounds like you have a fun G.C.

Reply
Jesse
7/14/2020 10:23:43 am

Your situation would be allowed, because of the 6" main. That's the minimum size allowed.

In the OP situation, the underground size is 2". This is only permissible if the system riser is 2" also and there are no hydrants on that lead in

Reply
SUBMITTER
7/14/2020 10:35:02 am

Correct - no hydrants on the lead-in, hydraulically calculated, no domestic flow either.

Colin
7/14/2020 01:03:51 pm

Jesse, this is a hydraulically calculated system with no hydrants. Please provide the code reference where it states that the riser must be the same size as the underground. I believe that's only for pipe schedule systems. While its not "best practice", I'm not aware of a code prohibiting what the OP is asking.

Nic
7/14/2020 10:27:15 am

NFPA 13 2019ed 5.1.3.2 says the incoming fire main can be less than 6" if the incoming main is at least as large as the system riser. So currently you have a problem if your riser is 2-1/2" and incoming main is 2"

But I could technically see a loop hole if you made your system riser 2" and overhead feed main 2-1/2". Not sure if your calcs would work with that.

Reply
SUBMITTER
7/14/2020 10:36:33 am

Even the 2019 section you've referenced, though, is only fir pipe schedule systems.

5.1.3.2(2) "Systems that are not hydraulically calculated shall have a main at least as large as the system riser."

This project is hydraulically calculated, and with the room design method in NFPA 13 it works with the 2-inch underground and 2-1/2" mains.

Reply
Nic
7/14/2020 10:50:23 am

Ah good point. Not sure how I missed that. I don't see where you it says you can't do what you have planned then.

KN
7/14/2020 10:46:49 am

It's common around here to tap the city main with one size, and then to upsize the pipe after the water meter. For example, you could tap the city main with a 2" pipe and then after the meter, upsize the underground to 2½" pipe or 3" pipe (depending your system demand). This obviously has an effect on your hydraulics, but if you can figure out a way to make the calcs work, there technicially isnt any problem with this.

Reply
SUBMITTER
7/16/2020 07:34:29 am

KN - just out of curiosity - do the hydraulic calculations typically accurately reflect the loss through the water meter and smaller tap?

I rarely see water meter losses accounted for, then again around here its uncommon to have fire flow through the meter.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jump to: Daily Posts
    Jump to: PE Problems
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    Free Signup

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    Community

    Thank You to Our Top
    ​October '20 Contributors!
    1. SK
    2. Franck
    3. Dan W.
    4. Jonathan ​5. Casey M.
    6. Sean
    7. Colin L.
    8. Mike
    9. Jonathan J
    ​10. Daniel G.


    Your Post

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    The Toolkit

    Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
    ​
    ​Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
    Picture
    FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    Filters

    All
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    IFC
    Information Sources For Analysis
    IRC
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 12
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management Systems
    Special Hazard Systems
    Types Of Analysis
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015


    Daily
    Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    Exam Prep

    Picture
    2020 PE Prep Guide​
    ​(Available Now!)
    Picture
    PE Prep Series
    ​(Available Now!)
    2020 PE Prep Series
    Current Leaderboard
    ​(Click to enlarge)
    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep

    PE Problems
    ​Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

    Solutions are posted the day after posting.

    Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

    Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

    RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store
Picture
Copyright © 2020 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About