Sprinkler Hazard Class. for Cannabis Extraction?

4/16/2020

Got any information on what a cannabis extraction facility would fall under design-wise per NFPA 13?

The facility is less than 5,800 sf and may not need anything per the AHJ but I want to be sure what the correct hazard classification should be in case they do decide to put a sprinkler system in, should anyone have information more than what an "agricultural facility" is listed in 13. Thanks in advance.

Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe

7 Comments

Jesse

4/16/2020 10:08:27 am

It depends on the extraction process. There is a mechanical press process, a CO2 process, and a butane extraction process. Prior to my current job, I was a high protected risk engineer for insurance and we surveyed a lot of CBD processors. The hazard class will be governed by the overall process. Its likely the system would be designed to OH2, with a pocket of a higher density of EH2 for the butane extraction.

Stephen Dale

4/16/2020 10:23:14 am

I agree with the other comments. The butane extraction process is quite hazardous and needs good controls beyond just ceiling sprinkler protection. Even the CO2 has issues with design concentrations and tenability. I guess what i am saying is that, depending on the process, this is an EH2 area and ceiling protection design is not your only issue.

Jonathan Sullivan

4/16/2020 11:15:24 am

Not an expert in this area, but I enjoyed the NFPA Journal a few years back where the cover was a large cannabis plant. Kept that on my desk as a conversation starter for a while.

Check out Chapter 38 of NFPA 1-2018, it has the requirements for holistic protection in extraction spaces. Even if not adopted, you can use as best practice. Denver CO building and fire code would also be good references, I think.

Dave Snyder

4/16/2020 12:29:01 pm

Handled one of these a couple years ago using the butane (including propane) process. Extremely hazardous as the two gases are not odorized. As stated above the process will dictate the hazard classes to be considered for use.

Spoke at the time to the chair of the NFPA 1 committee and also the Denver FD Fire Protection Engineer. NFPA 1 criteria is based on the Denver FD requirements, As also stated above, other aspects of life safety come into play to develop an integrated fire protection / life safety approach. A Fire Protection Engineer (or other qualified design professional) should be making the fire protection design decisions.

Kevin Geidel

4/16/2020 12:29:15 pm

-The process and hazards present drive the sprinkler classification. The ventilation requirements and fire separation are also important to the determination. My experience has shown the bio mass is not the driving factor, but the chemicals and process utilized for extraction. We recently worked with a pressurized ethanol extraction process that was at approximately 60°F.

Check with your local AHJ with regards to "agricultural facility" as these have often been considered industrial and pharmaceutical.

Mike Armstrong

4/17/2020 09:24:22 am

I believe the ICC has a relatively new document that address'all aspects of these facilities. You may check their site. I know several AHJ's who are using the document and have found it cover all aspects thoroughly.

Marc L Tardif

4/3/2022 02:19:28 pm

Hazardous Solvents are frequently used for plant oil extraction and post extraction oil refinement. the 2 most common solvents used for Initial oil extraction are:
1) LPG (propane & butane) which are flammable gases regulated under NFPA 58, and:
2) Ethanol, a class 1B flammable liquid regulated under NFPA 30, and chap 66 of the NFPA 1 fire code.

Ethanol and other flammable liquids are also used in post extraction oil refinement.

Extra Hazard GP 2 design criteria should be used in these spaces.

Leave a Reply.

Home
Our Cause

The Blog
The Forum

PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit
MeyerFire University

Pricing
Login
Support
Contact Us

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.
All text, images, and media Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

Sprinkler Hazard Class. for Cannabis Extraction?

Leave a Reply.

ALL-ACCESS

SUBSCRIBE

COMMUNITY

YOUR POST

PE EXAM

FILTERS

ARCHIVES

PE PREP SERIES