MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Specifying Galvanized for Dry? Nitrogen? Sch40?

8/9/2021

8 Comments

 
I'd like to ask a question especially to other specifiers out there. Interested in galvanized pipe, particularly on dry systems.

We all know the valid arguments, reasons, and ever-growing evidence against the use galvanized pipe on dry systems. I always find it curious FM Global is still hanging on to it (although it says galvanizing must be applied after roll-grooving).

While the case for nitrogen systems is becoming stronger, and even more cost-effective, I have not seen it going there yet except on military applications, and generally-speaking, owners are not warming up to it yet (maybe I should be a better salesperson). Owner learning-curve is a factor.

At the time of this writing (mid-2021) are other specifiers requiring nitrogen systems across-the board?

Are you requiring schedule 40 pipe on dry systems? Galvanized?

(See also: https://www.meyerfire.com/blog/why-are-dry-pipe-sprinkler-systems-so-difficult )

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Jon Sullivan
8/9/2021 08:25:39 am

We have not seen nitrogen yet in my industry sector which is public transportation on the east coast. We’ve recommended it, but my take is that it will be a while.

However, we do have clients request Schedule 80 galvanized so they are aware of the maintenance issues. Hopefully we’ll come around to nitrogen.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
8/9/2021 08:36:01 am

I am not a specifier full time, but I do some consulting on design build or in assistance to some engineers. We are starting to see it "considered" more often and sometimes it actually makes it through the design phase, into the specs, and through VE reviews, to actually be installed. My personal opinion (if I were to own a building with a dry system), would be to use black sch. 10 mains, black sch. 40 lines, using a nitrogen system that has the ability to self monitor and report when nitrogen drops below 98%. The only exception would be to use galvanized pipe where exposed to the weather or in areas near the coast, or other caustic environments, strictly for the external protection that galvanizing provides.

Reply
schulman
8/9/2021 08:43:40 am

here in NC the State Construction Office standard is Schedule 10 and 40 Black Steel Pipe on dry systems - only changed recently mind you ...
after years of failing Galv. Systems ...
and no, very little Nitrogen usage ... primarily due to cost ...

Reply
James
8/9/2021 08:49:05 am

Not a specifier here - but I can say when I see a nitrogen system included in the plans/specs it is a huge relief and I'm very happy it is there; I try to help make the owner aware of system lifetime and longevity on the backend with contractors, but it can still be a tough ask when nothing is in the bid documents.

At least having it in the bid docs helps us on the install side support the idea and try to help the system life and the owner. Not every contractor agrees I'm sure, but I'm thrilled when I see it in the docs on the front end.

Here in a few years when the C-Factor changes to 120 for black steel and nitrogen on new systems (I believe NFPA 13-2022), it'll be a considerable kickback on the cost of the installed system. Just more reason to get it included.

Reply
Glenn Berger
8/9/2021 09:25:11 am

Been specifying Schedule 40 Black Steel with Nitrogen for Government clients for almost 10 years and almost 5 years with commercial clients. Commercial clients have been coming around to N2 once they have experienced a system failure.

Reply
Andrew K
8/9/2021 10:06:23 am

This perspective comes from an installing contractor of fire suppression/protection systems in the NYC metropolitan area. In recent years we have experienced an increase in both having nitrogen generators for dry & pre-action systems spec'd in project bid documents, as well as an increased acceptance of such systems when proposed as a change. The nitrogen generator systems for dry and pre-action systems are now more likely to appear on bid documents than not. A guestimate would be in the area of 75% prevalence on projects.
These nitrogen generator systems are mostly spec'd and installed with Black, schedule 40 pipe.

p.s. I am in awe of this forum. Exceptional expertise.

Reply
Alex
8/9/2021 11:47:22 am

HI Anonymous,

On the contractor side, I still see some designers requiring the use of galvanized. Although, for any design build, we will use black steel, schedule 40 pipe.

To answer your question, I have not seen others specifying nitrogen systems across the board. Personally, I feel as the industry will go that direction overtime.

Best of luck with your design,
Alex

Reply
Scott
8/9/2021 01:08:00 pm

We like to spec Sch 40 black steel with an air compressor with a dryer package. Normally the cost of the dryer package is much more affordable than your nitrogen generator package and will still extend your systems life expectancy to some degree. We've noticed that the Nitrogen Generators in theory sound great and been marketed well to engineers, except that the cost is often never explained in full to the engineering side for proper cost analysis.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT