MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Remove Diesel & Keep Only Electric Fire Pump?

2/23/2024

11 Comments

 
We have a building with an Extra Hazard Group 1 in a fairly rural location. We have an Electric, Diesel and Jockey (electric) pump system.

We had our diesel go out, sent away for repairs. What are the requirements for just having just electric in place?

My concern is is the fire department cuts power if they come on site for industrial fire, or lose power due to weather, then we would have no suppression in service.

The fire department can provide 1,500 gpm at 100 psi from a Type 1 engine through the FDC, (so 750 gallons). We have a pond to draft from.

What would be the considerations? Amount of water available? 

In the event of power loss, the size of the FDC versus the size of the riser (a 6-8" dry pipe valve)?

What would realistic attack line demand be for a hydrant/hose line? Can you think of anything else I'm not thinking of?

Thanks in advance for the help!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
JI
2/23/2024 08:19:45 am

My first thought is a back up generator should be on site which is able to supply the fire pump for the NFPA required water demand. The generator sizing should be for the duration of the water supply at the horsepower requirements for the sprinkler system demand. Depending on the types of systems, there might be varying durations and sprinkler demands that would need to be compared to see what the generator sizing should be. There are many factors that go into generator selection such as fuels readily available in the area, but in some cases the cost of a generator is not prohibitive when compared to a diesel fire pump install. However some facilities already require a generator so it is not a big deal to add the extra demand of a fire pump.

Secondly, the FDC is only an NFPA 13 requirement to supplement water supply, not to fully supply a sprinkler system. Depending on the type (pipe diameter, length, number of outlets) of FDC it may not be enough to ever satisfy sprinkler demand. A discussion with the fire department based on response times, and the system performance through the FDC would be a good idea to determine if the FD/AHJ is okay with potential power outages impairing the pump.

Reply
Glenn Berger
2/23/2024 08:28:59 am

Just having a single electric fire pump is satisfactory per the codes IF you have reliable power and IF your client doesn't want back-up equipment.

Power for the electric fire pump should be ahead of the building shut-off "switch." as such the fire department should not be cutting the power to the fire pump as part of their response plan.

Reply
Jack G
2/23/2024 08:31:40 am

Keep the diesel. Em generator would cost a couple hundred thousand.
Back when this was installed, there is a 25% reduction in insurance premiums for having a secondary or backup water supply, and the premium is probably big for x- haz-1.

Reply
Franck
2/23/2024 08:35:17 am

Another concern might come from the Insurance Company.
Depending on the insured values and the expected loss scenarios (PML/MFL), 2 fire pumps might be required, or additional premium applied.
Supply by Fire Department via FDC is not considered as an alternative to a fire pump. And 1500 gpm à 100 psi might not be sufficient for EH Gr 1 (check with the hydraulic calculations results and requirements for hoses/hydrants as it will be the same water supply for both in that case).

Back up generator is an option (but might be more costly than put back the diesel pump if there is none).

Another concern is that most Fire Department will put out the power when arriving on site. One possible solution is then to have 2 different switches : one for the entire plant and one dedicated for the electric pump, so that you can switch off the poser ton the plant without switching off the power to the pump.

Otherwise, many facilities have just one pump.
And electric pumps are more reliable than diesel pumps (except if no power, but how often it happens?).

Reply
Anthony
2/23/2024 08:38:49 am

Fire pump back up is one of the more difficult parts of the job for 'sprinkler guys' like me. The easiest options are always diesel back up or a generator with automatic transfer switch. The back up power or source of water only comes into play in section 9.3 where the fire department can't supply the required water to tall buildings.

code says:
9.2.2 The normal source of power required in 9.2.1 and its
routing shall be arranged in accordance with one of the following:
(1) Service connection dedicated to the fire pump installation
(2) On-site power production facility connection dedicated to the fire pump installation
(3) Dedicated feeder connection derived directly from the dedicated service to the fire pump installation
(4) As a feeder connection where all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The protected facility is part of a multibuilding campus-style arrangement.
(b) A backup source of power is provided from a source independent of the normal source of power.
(c) It is impractical to supply the normal source of power through the arrangement in 9.2.2(1), 9.2.2(2), or9.2.2(3).
(d) The arrangement is acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
(e) The overcurrent protection device(s) in each disconnecting means is selectively coordinated with any other supply side overcurrent protective device(s).
(5) Dedicated transformer connection directly from the ser-vice meeting the requirements of Article 695 of NFPA70,National Electrical Code

9.3.1 Except for an arrangement described in 9.3.3, at least
one alternate source of power shall be provided where the
height of the structure is beyond the pumping capacity of the
fire department apparatus.

9.3.2*Other Sources. Except for an arrangement described in
9.3.3, at least one alternate source of power shall be provided
where the normal source is not reliable.

9.3.3 An alternate source of power for the primary fire pump
shall not be required where a backup engine-driven fire pump,
backup steam turbine-driven fire pump, or backup electric
motor–driven fire pump with independent power source meeting 9.2.2 is installed in accordance with this standard

So as long as the fire department can supply the building height then you only need to make sure the power to the pump follows the rules of 9.2.2.

IF your power supply flows that and all the rules of NEC then there is no need for the diesel.

Reply
Greg
2/23/2024 08:46:21 am

Good question. I've recently evaluated the same choice for diesel fire pump keep, or remove.

In reviewing a few U.S. state adopted codes for fire protection, I've concluded that water supply provisions adequate to supply sprinkler systems and hydrants are required, and that the supply must meet the demands, and be reliable.

A specific statement does not appear for dual 100% capability. I believe I'm correct in saying that redundancy of pumps to provide additional reliability, above that of meeting the demand requirement of hydrants and sprinkler systems, does not appear to be within the model codes.

However, corporate expectations to control property loss, and insurance company recommended practices will tend towards ensuring 'highly reliable' water supplies. The term 'highly reliable' denotes the capability for a water supply system to be available through a plethora of conditions, of which one should consider electrical power loss, underground line break/service, fire pump service and maintenance, fuel delivery (for extended fire events), ground level water tank inspections, suction cleanout (for natural bodies of water), etc., etc., etc.

The best design concepts for creating highly reliable service comes from the recommendations within FM Global Data Sheets and other property insurer publications. The "extra" within the guidelines of the insurer's recommendations is above code minimum but may be in-fact 'good business sense', and be practical to rule out fire risk and consequence.

Ancillary references to reliability that include terms such as "defense in depth" would come from the U.S. DOE fire program's design for water supply, or U.S. DOD UFC documents. In such DOE / DOD programs, further consideration than dual pumps occur, through a design including remote pump houses, extensive sectional control valving, and considerations for elevated tanks (the most reliable of all).

Reply
Jesse
2/23/2024 09:01:31 am

The electric pump is sufficient presuming the electric utility is reliable.

Having served as a professional firefighter for nearly 20 years I can attest that, yes indeed fire will turn off the power, But the pump should have a dedicated service. And the FD in their pre-planning should know which power to disable and which to leave on.

Franck brings up a good point re: the insurer. Depending on the insurer, and the values involved, property carriers consider themselves an equal AHJ. When the PML reaches a specified value, the insurer may require multiple pumps and failure to provide may limit coverage. If it does, you need to ensure that their impairment procedures are being followed.

Reply
Kimberly Olivas
2/23/2024 09:47:10 am

By Code, electric fire pumps can only be used exclusively if the AHJ has deemed the power supply to be reliable enough. You cannot set your electric fire pump up with any shut off switches before the controller either. It has its own feed. If the fire pumps were the electric and a diesel pump back-up, then it could be possible to get rid of the diesel. But that's up to the AHJ, I would think. I am just talking off the cuff; I was excited to see a question I might be able to help answer. :)

Reply
Dan Wilder
2/23/2024 12:02:17 pm

As with everyone else, Reliable power as determined by the AHJ/Insurance. If the pump is on site backup gens and has the appropriate switches/panels to make that transition

There are several rental companies that can provide a temp diesel pump, trailer mounted, with or without a jockey pump, manual or automatic off via pressure solenoid, cell notification....lots of options. We have done multiple pumps in this fashion during maintenance down time or catastrophic failures that have occurred.

Reply
Pete
2/23/2024 03:13:06 pm

Someone please sell me a diesel jockey pump. The reason is with all my 2-pump electric/diesel installations, when there's a site-wide power outage, the diesel doesn't function as a back-up pump. The electric jockey pump always fails with the power outage, same as the electric fire pump. The diesel pump comes on due to normal system pressure drops over a couple hours without a jockey pump. Then a tech gets a call from the central station and must respond to shut the diesel pump off. The set-up is hardly a substitution for reliable power.

Reply
sean
2/26/2024 01:24:40 pm

I think your biggest issue is right now the original design included both pumps. The code requires to maintain the system and equipment as first designed.

By reducing that you place a larger risk on liability.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT