MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Remote Area Width Based on Original/Adjusted?

3/15/2023

11 Comments

 
Is the minimum length  for a remote area determined by the original Density/Area (such as 1,500 sqft so it would be 46.5 ft), or is it based on a modified/adjusted area (such as 900 sqft = 36 ft).

After doing this for years, I was trained and always took is as a given that we use the length based on the original area. I cannot seem to find an actual reference backing this up.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Pete H
3/15/2023 06:47:20 am

I don't have any code reference on hand, but the way I've been trained is the longest distance in your remote area is orientated to run parallel to the branches, and the shorter distance of your rectangle to run perpendicular to that.

Granted, room shapes, building shapes, and pipe arrangements don't always make for perfect rectangles, and if the building size doesn't allow the full 1.2 multiplied by the square root of the design area length to run in the same orientation as the branch lines, then you make the perpendicular measurement in your rectangle larger to make the required area.

Apply this logic as necessary for alternate arrangements that do not allow for a perfect rectangle.

Reply
Dan Wilder
3/15/2023 07:32:42 am

NFPA 13 - 22'

Area is taken from Section 19.2.3.1.1 (single point or density/area curves) and adjusted accordingly based on (not a complete list):
-Building construction (roof/ceiling slope 19.2.3.2.4)
-Sprinklered/unsprinklered allowances (19.2.3.1.5.2)
-QR sprinklers (19.2.3.2.3.1)
-High temp sprinklers (19.2.3.2.6)
-System type (dry or DI preaction 19.2.3.2.5)
-Orifice Size (19.2.3.2.7)
-Multiple variations of the adjustments based on the original area of operation, including the section 19.2.3.2.8.2 for unsprinklered combustible concealed spaces. As they are multiplicative, there is no order of operations, the end answer will always be the same (decrease 20% & increase 30% is the same as increase 30% and decrease 20%).

28.2.4.2.1* Where the design is based on the density/area method, the design area shall be a rectangular area having a dimension parallel to the branch lines at least 1.2 times the square root of the ***area of sprinkler operation (A) used***, which shall permit the inclusion of sprinklers on both sides of the cross main.

Emphasis on the "area of sprinkler operation used***. This does not reference the minimum, standard, or maximum square footage of the remote area....just that the calculation is to take into account the area used x 1.2 as found in Section 19.2.3.1.1.

Like much of NFPA, the earlier it happens in the book typically means that is a starting point and is modified after via subsequent and/or subsections. The book provides area/density tables, then modifications up and/or down, then tells how to perform the hydraulic calculation based on the information.

Reply
danefre
3/15/2023 08:22:38 am

Dan and Pete nailed it.

A bit unrelated to this - one of the common mistakes we see in dry systems with pitched roofs is the way the 30% increases are taken.

30% for dry & 30% for pitched is NOT a total of 60% increase

Reply
David Kendrick
3/15/2023 09:47:36 am

NFPA 13 - 2016 Annex

A.11.2.3.2.7 Example 1. A dry pipe sprinkler system (OH2) in a
building with a ceiling slope exceeding 2 in 12 in. (50 in 300mm)
(16.6 percent slope). The initial area must be increased 30 percent
for the dry pipe system and the resulting area an additional
30 percent for the roof slope. If the point 0.2 gpm/ft2 (8.1 mm/
min) over 1500 ft2 (139m2) is chosen from Figure 11.2.3.1.1, the
1500 ft2 (139 m2) area is increased 450 ft2 (42 m2) to 1950 ft2
(181 m2), which is then further increased 585 ft2 (54 m2). The
final discharge criterion is then 0.2 gpm/ft2 (8.1 mm/min) over
2535 ft2 (235 m2).

So the first 30 percent add to 1500 square feet is 1950. The second add is 1950 times 30 percent for 2535 square feet.

danefre
3/15/2023 10:24:56 am

Thanks for the reference. I'm glad the annex has an example.

Surprisingly, I have seen boilerplate spec's actually say increase by 60% for dry system and pitched roof.

Glenn Berger
3/15/2023 08:15:02 am

I am not quite sure what your question is implying. If you have a renovation project that requires sprinklers to be replaced / relocated and with piping reconfigured then you need to verify that the original conditions are not affected from the design.

Reply
Anthony
3/15/2023 10:30:13 am

As others have said, and I agree, the length of the longest side of the remote area along a branch line should be based on the modified area.

In your example yes you should use 36'-0.

Reply
sean
3/15/2023 12:03:38 pm

The final area is what determines the width.

Reply
Franck
3/15/2023 12:07:34 pm

It has to be done on your final design area.
If it is modified to 900, this is what you have to use.
Otherwise you won’t have the same required shape for your calculation. It might end up with a more favorable result (if your length along the branchline is proportionally smaller than with 1.2 factor) or unfavorable if the length is longer.
In your case, using 46.5 instead of 36 ft for 900 sq ft would end up with a higher flow and pressure demand (enhanced friction loss contribution along the branch lines).

I used to work for an insurance company that used to require a 1.4 factor instead of 1.2 as a conservative approach… And it does make a difference on the end result…

Reply
DAVE
3/15/2023 12:07:53 pm

Agreed, it's 1.2 x the square root of the adusted. I have always explained to trainees that once the final size of the remote area is determined, the multiplier adjusts a theoretical perfectly square fire into a more demanding NFPA 13-required rectangular remote area, and aligning with the branch lines to pick up more sprinklers usually (but not always) creates a greater system demand.
Interesting about the 30% plus 30% for dry system, I have not yet found someone making that 60% mistake, but will watch for it.

Reply
Alex
3/16/2023 05:57:47 am

As others have mentioned, you use your final area when determining branch lines and number of heads. Same goes for dry or pitched systems.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT