MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Protect Dome Using Deluge Sprinkler System?

8/8/2022

14 Comments

 
We have a church project with a 22'-0 wide dome in the ceiling (all steel w/sheetrock finish), the dome itself is 13'-0 tall.

The consulting engineer is saying the dome doesn't need sprinklers in it - they just did one in a different state and they put sprinklers around the base of the dome to protect it, but nothing in it or at the top.

The dome is on the second level ceiling/roof - so if you stand on the first floor you can look all the way up to the dome. 
Picture
Picture
They originally did not want us to sprinkler it. We ended up putting 4 pipes symmetrically with a sprinkler at the end of each one, keeping spacing correct, etc. They didn't hide it behind the sheetrock as originally intended and they don't want to build soffits around the pipe, so they are back to wanting me to remove them. I explained it is my interpretation that this is a ceiling pocket by definition and there is nothing in NFPA 13 allowing me to exempt sprinkler coverage from the floor space below this dome. 

The fire marshal and the engineer conversed and they suggested putting an open head deluge system in this area with 4 evenly spaced open sidewalls in the soffit at the bottom of the dome spraying toward the center with a single or double electric deluge system.

I wouldn't want to do it with a single device personally, I would suggest a heat and smoke, both needing activation for the solenoid to open. I think the sidewalls would get the spray over the hazard (covering the floor area), but I'm concerned they won't activate properly. 

What is your take on this?

Is detection using heat or smoke at the high point of the dome for activation with open-head deluge sidewall sprinklers code compliant?

New to me, thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments
chad
8/8/2022 08:10:27 am

Deluge seems a bit aggressive and potentially problematic. Of course you are right about it being a ceiling pocket.

Do they need to sprinkle it for insurance purposes to call it "fully sprinkled"?

I would be in favor of omitting the sprinklers in there as the AHJ, if this is a historical building, provided that you add beam smokes accounting for stratification throughout below and a spot head in it. Add some side walls around the opening for a feel good measure? I know we are talking performance based esque stuff here but it just my gut reaction to it.

Putting two devices near the top that will be never really tested and serviced and potentially cause false alarms connected to a deluge does not seem ideal

Reply
Peter
8/8/2022 08:58:07 am

Aggressive is an understatement. This may make everyone feel warm and fuzzy for the installation, but this is going to be an ITM nightmare. NFPA 25 requires deluge systems to be flowed annually. While I won't speak specifically about this church, I have been in enough of them to know that discharging water inside one would be challenging at best. In reality, the deluge system will never be properly tested. Testing heat and/or smoke detectors located at +/- 43' inside the dome will also be an ongoing ITM nightmare.

Reply
Glenn Berger
8/8/2022 08:14:42 am

1) Sprinklers would be required in this space to consider the facility fully sprinklered.

2) I do not recommend a deluge system for this application.

3) Need to check the construction details on whether piping can be installed out of sight.

This is a why coordination is required during design to ensure a code compliant design is the outcome. Since this has become a retro-fix case, recommend beam detectors be placed below the dome level of the second floor, if possible to get the alarms going and fire department response.

Reply
Dan Wilder
8/8/2022 08:35:50 am

Have you reviewed NFPA 914 for Historic Buildings?

I've done similar deluge systems but only to half the total height of the protected space (ceiling was at 110') open head deluge (sidewalls) tripped by UV/IR was around the 60' mark (Las Vegas).

If there is an engineering report detailing out the alternate and the AHJ had bought off, feel free to write in your recommendations but at that point you are an installing contractor and not the EOR, just document everything and follow the installation criteria. Yes the pocket would need protection to comply with "fully sprinklered".

https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=914

Reply
Jesse
8/8/2022 09:35:15 am

It does need to be sprinklered, and I agree that an open head deluge system is a bad idea. The ITM requirements alone make we want to forget this idea entirely.

Reply
OP
8/8/2022 10:15:41 am

- This is not a historic buiding, actually new construction.
- It does need sprinkler protection to be fully sprinklered
We coordinated way ahead, we ran four wet sprinklers with our piping up tight to the four steel beams from base to high center, the contractor did not buildout the ceiling to conceal the pipe as they were supposed too. Now they want us to remove it and not protect it or find another way.
We could find no other way to protect it reasonably or per code and the fire marshal suggested the open head deluge. I doubt they will do it due to price, but I couldn't think of any other way to provide coverage. My thought was to build the ceiling out and leave the four sprinklers there...
An engineer they brought in wanted us to provide pendent sprinklers around the base as they have done in another facility in another state - I explained this was a ceiling pocket, not a vertical opening and being 22-0 wide presents another issue for coverage, not to mention heat collection at the sprinklers...

Reply
chad
8/8/2022 10:21:51 am

Its new construction?!?!--- don't back down, you are in the right. make them change it if they don't want soffits or to see the pipe, you warmed them. Sheesh.

Reply
Albert
8/16/2022 09:36:39 pm

Make the fire marshall change? That’s a good way to make a new friend.

Tim De Witt
8/10/2022 01:24:20 am

There is a paper published that indicates sprinklers will have significant delay in response or even not operate at all with such extremely high ceilings or soffits. Available methods of calculation will proof that. I will consider engineered smoke control design with aspirated early warning detection which will satisfy life safety. Non-combustible building materials with fire proofing on steel subframe to prevent structural failure can be also be implemented. Further full CFD modelling should be done. Sprinklers may not be the design solution in this case.

Reply
Greg
8/15/2022 07:54:46 am

Place of worship present unique challenges. Start with the code required "why" for sprinklers and the "fire science" why. From the code perspective there is a compulsion for a fully sprinklered occupancy. Is there any sprinkler (sidewall) or other automatic actuating head that will work for the space and achieves the aesthetic requirements? If not, move to rational from the fire science side of the problem. When would the dome sprinklers be activated? Is it most likely that fire control will occur from a heat plume somewhere along the ceiling, but not under the dome? Is it probable that (based on what is intended underneath the dome) that the dome sprinklers could even be effective in controlling a floor level fire. What if the dome sprinklers failed to activate or were delayed based on an imperfect heat plume? What would be the result, if the fire starts directly under the dome, and no sprinklers operated in the dome, could the remaining sprinklers control the fire? How large could a fire be, as domes are typically a feature designed by the architect for people to walk under. Or is this intended to house a display, is there an electrical plug for such displays?

In concluding, if the dome is ancillary to the ceiling, which it appears it is and there is not a sprinkler type that will match the space or the aesthetic requirement, that the questions above be brought out in conversation and with any additional fire features or benefits such as smoke detection (not from the standpoint of an assembly occupancy) but the early warning and emergency response.

Reply
chad
8/15/2022 07:57:35 am

Science? (gasp) How scary and forward thinking of you.

Greg- you nailed it.

Reply
Greg
8/15/2022 12:33:53 pm

Thank you Chad,

My last paragraph seems to be missing a cut paste. opps. If not sprinklered, conclusions should match a fire science perspective and the rational shared with owner, AHJ .

Albert
8/16/2022 09:31:44 pm

Deluge?!? Are you sure the fire marshall isn’t having a bit of fun with you? I’d put a concealed ec pendant right on the center.

Reply
OP
8/16/2022 09:36:16 pm

Absolutely sure, It was the fire marshals idea trying to satisfy the engineer.
I priced it, they decided to leave the four sprinklers and rework the dome ceiling so the pipe will be hidden (as it was originally coordinated to be).
Thank you all for your insight.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT