MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Pressure Gauge Req'd on Both Sides of Backflow?

1/3/2024

11 Comments

 
Would you require a pressure gauge on the bottom side of the backflow device?

NFPA 13 says pressure gauges shall be installed above and below each “alarm” check valve or “system riser” check valve where such devices are present.

Is the backflow preventer considered an alarm check or riser check valve?

Picture

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Pete H
1/3/2024 07:25:24 am

I could be entirely wrong, so take with a grain of salt:

From NFPA 13 (2016)

7.1.1.2 Pressure gauges shall be installed above and below each alarm check valve or system riser check valve where such devices are present.

8.16.1.1.2.5 A listed backflow prevention assembly shall be permitted to be considered a control valve, provided both control valves are listed for fire protection system use and an additional control valve not required.

8.16.1.1.3.2 A listed backflow prevention devices shall be considered a check valve, and an additional check valve shall not be required.

--

Since the device of the alarm check valve or system riser check valve is not technically present as much as they have a listed backflow device serving their purpose, 7.1.1.2 may not apply.

But I could also see the argument that since the backflow device is considered a check valve, and pressure gauges should be considered required, but I ultimately see that being up to AHJ interpretation of the code. I can read it either way.

Reply
Dan Wilder
1/3/2024 07:44:05 am

All references are to NFPA 13 - 2019

Yes, by using the available ports on the assembly. Test cock #2 & #3 provide the outlet locations needed to comply (on each side of the backflow clappers) and is downstream of the butterfly valve for access/maintenance. No different than an alarm check.

Worst case, use the #1 position for a gauge but no reason to add another outlet for a gauge on the supply side. Any service at this location requires building service shutdown of the incoming underground line.

The reason for that location (the pressure gauges) is to indicate an issue with the check valve (clappers of the backflow in this case) so no code/standard driven requirement for additional. It is nice to see if the UG supply is pressurized, but easily checked via cracking the control valve open a little. The control valve (butterfly/OS&Y) already has an indicating means for identifying an open/partial open/closed, closed valve condition.

As to what a backflow is defined as, firstly - the gauge requirement is for a "System Riser" which is defined below. Notice that there is no requirement for a check/backflow valve:

3.3.215 System Riser.
The aboveground horizontal or vertical pipe between the water supply and the mains (cross or feed) that contains a control valve (either directly or within its supply pipe), a pressure gauge, a drain, and a waterflow alarm device.

8.1.1.1 says only 1 gauge is required
8.1.1.2 says 2 gauges are required when an alarm check or system riser check valve is installed

Backflows aren't really discussed as a system riser until:
3.3.46* Control Valve. - A valve controlling flow to water-based fire protection systems and devices.
16.9.3 Control Valves
16.9.3.3.5
A listed backflow prevention assembly shall be permitted to be considered a control valve, provided both control valves are listed for fire protection system use and an additional control valve shall not be required.

Phew....getting all the definitions out of the way early this week!

Reply
Anthony
1/3/2024 07:51:37 am

A backflow preventer is definitely not considered an alarm check as it has no flow switch, alarm bell etc. I think the point of the code is to make sure the contractor actually installs the gauges in the ports provided by the alarm/riser check. I can see those getting skipped. I can see why it would be useful to have a gauge on the upstream side of the backflow preventer, but I would not require it as a specifying engineer.

Reply
Alex
1/3/2024 08:54:06 am

I do not believe a gauge is required. If there is an issue with the DCVA, it will be noticed during your forward flow test. Curious what others have to say.

Reply
sean
1/3/2024 09:03:47 am

The backflow device is not regulated by NFPA 13. If you see backflow protection is dictated by the local plumbing code. Your local plumbing code will dictate where gauges are required. If you use the International Plumbing Code 608.17.4.1 says you need a RP , RPZ, or RPDA device as a fire department connection is a second non-potable source.

Per SECTION 312 TESTS AND INSPECTIONS it appears you need to have the connection to support a gauge but may not required to keep it installed. Either way this plumbing device and shall be regulated by the local plumbing code.

Reply
Jack G
1/3/2024 10:04:57 am

To cover your bases( as AHJ ) may require, I ve been ordering the bfp with ports on each side of supply side gr valve. No difference in price, or replace the supply side with one that has the ports, or an os&y with ports. Easy gauge ports.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
1/3/2024 11:01:57 am

Lots of great comments. Some different viewpoints I hadn't considered.

I would be concerned #1 of modifying a listed assembly by adding a gauge to it in a permanent way. #2 if added below the backflow, you can get into some contamination concerns with how it's added. Black steel spool piece and mech tee? Galv pipe? The gauge assembly going to be okay with the water dept. before the backflow?

I don't see a need for a permanent gauge here. Backflows are tested annually, and even more often in some areas.

Reply
Glenn Berger
1/3/2024 07:15:18 pm

I do require pressure gauges on both sides of backflow preventors.

Having them allows the determination of actual pressure drop across the BFP when preforming the forward flow testing.

A BFP is not an alarm check valve or a riser check valve.

Reply
Dave
1/4/2024 11:22:53 am

Glenn, our specs require them too (yet it is never followed), but I was drawing a blank where it originated from.

Reply
Glenn Berger
1/4/2024 02:19:34 pm

Dave,

I have no qualms about issuing non-compliance reports when doing field reviews. Most of my clients like when I can quote paragraph numbers when the requirements of a contract are not followed.

Dwight Havens
1/6/2024 08:37:23 am

Another benefit to having a gauge on the supply side of the backflow prevention assembly (BFPA) is that it assures the ability to watch the supply side water pressure during main drain tests. I've seen a lot of confusion on which pressures to observe and record for this purpose, with many tests performed without ever relieving the pressure on the system side of the BFPA, especially on large systems. These results are then worthless in determining any change in the status of of the water supply.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT