PE Problem #27

7/11/2019

Where an industrial application involves some uncertainty and deviation from standard practice and prescriptive code, but is without large uncertainties or extremely challenging applications, which of the following risk assessment approaches would be most appropriate?
a. Layer of protection analysis (FPS-LOPA)
b. Prescriptive standard application
c. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)
d. Human reliability analysis (HRA)

Solution | Posted 09/16/19

6 Comments

Amr

7/11/2019 10:32:55 am

a. Layer of protection analysis (FPS-LOPA) - SFPE 5th edition, P3184, Table 83.1

7/11/2019 02:34:53 pm

a. LOPA

Esteban Roldan

8/13/2019 09:07:12 pm

Did Meyer post the official answer to this?

9/15/2019 07:47:44 am

MF, please post! I agree that the answer should be QRA with supporting evidence from FPH p.3-140.

Joe

9/16/2019 07:26:14 am

Sorry about that! Posted now.

9/8/2019 10:32:15 am

c. QRA assess consequences and likelihood of each even to come up with risk assessment wheras, as part LOPA, it assess the number of protection layers with are being used to contain that risk. So answer must be QRA, other options not much relevant here.

Free Signup

Subscribe and learn something new each day:

Community

Thank You to Our Top November Contributors!

1. Mike
2. Cliff
3. Randy
4. Franck
5. NK

6. Matthew
7. On the Clock
8. Paul P.
9. Jesse C.
10. Doug

Your Post

The Toolkit

Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?

Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:

FREE 30-DAY TRIAL

GET THE TOOLKIT

Filters

Exam Prep

2019 PE Prep Guide
(Available Now!)

PE Prep Series
(Available Now!)

Current Leaderboard
(Click to enlarge)

PE Problems

Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

Solutions are posted the day after posting.

Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store

Copyright © 2019 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.