MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

NFPA 25 Standpipe Test with Only 2 Standpipes?

4/8/2022

11 Comments

 
I have a hospital that has two "double hose valves" at the top of two different standpipes on the roof. One is on a helipad and the other is below on a different roof. Both are the most remote locations.

Per NFPA 25, for the 5-year test, I'm supposed to flow 500 gpm at the most remote then an additional 250 gpm at a different standpipe until I reach 1,000 gpm for the fully-sprinklered building.

Can I just flow 500 gpm out of both double-hose valves (2 standpipes), or do I have to flow 500 gpm, then 250 gpm, then 250 gpm using three different standpipes?

Thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Alex
4/8/2022 06:06:27 am

Hi,

The Sprinkler Contractor you have conducting the test should already have an SOP written outlining their steps in conducting the test.

First. do you only have two standpipes within your building? From your last sentence, it alludes to there being more than two. NFPA 25 (2014) states standpipe system demand shall include 500 gpm from the first standpipe and 250 gpm for each additional standpipe until the total system demand is simultaneously flowing.

If you are uncertain about design flow, NFPA 14 (2013) states that maximum flow rate shall be 1000 gpm for buildings that are sprinklered throughout and 1250 gpm for buildings that are not.

Lastly, both valve locations will not be the most remote. The most remote location is a single point of your standpipe system that requires the greatest pressure to produce adequate flow. This is typically the highest valve since the pressure loss due to gravity is more significant than friction loss. EXCEPT, this is not always the case, especially if valves are located one story down than the others and are installed across the entire building… Hydraulic calculations can tell you which hose valve will be considered the most remote.

Hope this helps.
Alex

Reply
Nick
4/11/2022 07:39:38 am

Alex is spot on here. Also note you'll need a minimum 100 psi at that most remote standpipe connection.

Reply
Glenn Berger
4/8/2022 08:07:59 am

In order to comment, a full schematic of the system will need to be provided. You can possibly do a series of tests to ensure that the system can flow the required quantity of water.

Reply
Jesse
4/8/2022 09:08:39 am

I'm not sure where the 1,000-gpm flow rate is coming from. You should flow 500-gpm, 250-gpm from each of the two most remote hose connections of the most remote standpipe. and then 250-gpm from each remaining standpipe to a maximum of 1000-gpm for sprinklered buildings. Since you only have 2 standpipes, its 500-gpm + 250-gpm for a total flow of 750-gpm.

Reply
Colin Lusher link
4/8/2022 10:10:18 am

Your demand is 750 gpm with only two standpipes, not 1000 gpm. You need to flow 500 gpm from the most remote standpipe, then 250 at most remote valve on each additional standpipe up to a maximum of 1000 gpm. If there is only one additional standpipe, then you only need to flow 750 gpm. If you had three standpipes, you'd need to flow 1000 gpm.

Alex, yes, there is only one remote standpipe, but the second valve flowed should be the next most remote or demanding. We understand what he's saying here.

Reply
Dan Wilder
4/8/2022 11:13:40 am

Yep, flow is only 750GPM when there are only 2 standpipes in the building, 3 or more would require the full 1000 GPM (assuming a fully sprinklered building). As for testing, technically you could get away with flowing only 2 standpipes at 500GPM each would be a worst case scenario (again, assuming the other standpipes only have one hose valve at the top of each) but would not follow the 500250/250 standard already within NFPA 25.

The additional hose valve at the helipad is pretty common for the couple I have done(many times when there are no foam monitor nozzles).. Having a hose manifold (2 hose valves) at each main roof level with stairwell access is not uncommon as well with specifications

Are there any previous test reports showing what was done and accepted?
Do you have any calc plates or design drawings indicating what was remote? Even with the two levels of double hose valves, really need to understand the physical layout.

Reply
Anonymoose
4/8/2022 01:24:35 pm

So from reading Glenn's and Dan's comments, I have a question

4 3 2 1
Supply ═╩══╩══╩══╝

(assume the actually layout doesn't make (SP) 2, 3, or 4 more remote by distance or height)

Lets say SP3 was difficult to flow, ie no or deficient drainage, would it be acceptable to pickup an extra 250 on SP2 and get your required 1000 gpm that way? Since it would be more hydraulically demanding to skip 3 and make the feed carry 1000gpm all the way to 2, I think so.

PS. I think question does imply least a third standpipe

Reply
COLIN LUSHER
4/8/2022 01:55:22 pm

Technically, NFPA 14 requires you to flow each of the four standpipes in this situation. There is no provisions for the arrangement you/Glenn/Dan are suggesting.

But practically? Yes, I would say this would be a decent alternative way to test the system, you'd just need to get the buy in from the AHJ or approving authority since this scenario isn't covered by NFPA 14.

Reply
Anonymous
4/9/2022 09:32:20 am

This is a fully sprinkled hospital with multiple standpipes.
The two standpipes near helipad are the most remote. Both standpipes have “Siamese” hose valves at the top of each one at roof.
I also have another standpipe that I am prepared to flow at ground level and run hose out door to the parking lot to get an additional 250gpm.

Previous flow tests have only been with one hose monster at most remote standpipe(definitely not correct).

This system has a high pressure fire pump. After fire pump is an 8” pressure reducing valve. I recently adjusted it properly(was dropping well below 100psi while 2” main drain was open. It is now at 175psi with 2” main drain fully open.

I’m going to reach out to AHJ but in this area I don’t believe I’m going to get much help. Also going to dig into calcs more.

Thanks for all the advise!





Reply
COLIN LUSHER
4/11/2022 11:13:20 am

Ahhhh, ok, understood. In that case, yes, you'll need to flow 1000 gpm to properly test the system. It would be reasonable to ask the AHJ to allow you to flow the two most remote standpipes at 500 gpm each in lieu of adding in 250 gpm from a 3rd standpipe. Even though that differs from NFPA 14, it would be more demanding test and should satisfy the AHJ, in my opinion.

Reply
Anonymous
4/11/2022 08:47:01 pm

Thank you.




Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Jan 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT