MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

"Low Pressure FDC" Allowed Upstream of Pump?

5/6/2024

9 Comments

 
I have seen this method of arranging fire suppression components (see attached schematic) several times where I live. The attached is a partial re-creation of the fire water entry schematic for a high-rise building with a fire pump. The system has low and high pressure zones.

The underground parking dry systems are served by the municipal water directly, and the standpipes and aboveground sprinklers are fed by the pump.

Picture

Questions: 1. Can you have a FDC serving the low pressure zones as shown on the suction side of the pump per NFPA-14 6.4.3.1?

2. If not, how should the schematic be arranged instead?

3. What could happen if the Low Pressure FDC were pressurized as shown?

​This project was built under the 2013 editions of NFPA-13, 14, and 20. I am asking because I am beginning design of a sprinkler system for a 22 story high-rise. Thanks for your help.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Anthony
5/6/2024 07:36:11 am

1. No
2, have all systems fed from the pump.
3. probably nothing but I think the worry would be cavitation.

Why don't you have the pump service all the systems? There are plenty of 300 psi sprinklers available for high pressure zones that you'll have on your first several floors. Or after the pump do a PRV station and split the building into 2 systems a high pressure and low pressure system. Thats what I do on most high rises. see FIGURE A.7.2.4 Dual Pressure-Regulating Device Arrangement.( 2016 ed)

Also not sure your pump is rated high enough. that seems like a low boost for a building that's 22 stories.

Reply
OP
5/6/2024 09:59:09 am

Thanks, Anthony. To clarify - the schematic shown is for a previous project that's only 13 storeys, and I wasn't the designer. The 22 storey building is a new project that I will be designing.

Reply
Anthony
5/6/2024 08:04:23 am

So the part 3 was bugging me and looked it up in the 2019 handbook:

TL;DR: So the system is over pressurized, and reliability concerns .

According to 6.4.3, the fire department connection (FDC) is made on the system side of the check valve. For installation on systems with fire pumps, the FDC needs to be made on the sprinkler system side of the discharge check valve for the fire pump. Full efficiency and reliability cannot be obtained for a suction-side connection because of losses through the pump and valves and because of the inability to supplement the system if the discharge-side control valves are closed. Pumping into the suction side of a fire pump or booster pump increases the discharge pressure of the pump, frequently beyond the pressure limits of the system. The FDC should be made on the system side of a pump and on the system side — that is, the discharge side — of the pump’s discharge check valve and control valves."

Reply
JI
5/6/2024 08:24:08 am

In order to have a low pressure zone like that, the entire subheader for P2 & P1 should be subdivided with a check valve to ensure it cannot feed the suction side of the fire pump.

Sure there are Pressure Reducing Valves and high pressure sprinklers, but these can be more costly than sub dividing the the zone for various reasons:

-Potential for extra devices for the owner to maintain and test.
-Certain window sprinklers are also listed to 175 psi.
-Need special screwed fittings
-Fire pump may only be rated for small flow and high pressure to save on building generator costs (or to shave a bit of money off of the overall fire pump install too.)

Reply
OP
5/6/2024 09:59:58 am

That's generally what I'm thinking for my 22 storey project. Thanks!

Reply
chad
5/6/2024 08:42:23 am

It is common to have the garage with a separate FDC in many larger metros in colder climates with mid and high rises. How does the FD regularly operate?

From a design perspective I can see the advantages. From the AHJ perspective I can see confusion without detailed preplans and signage unless its common.

Reply
Dan Wilder
5/6/2024 08:59:37 am

Missing some info here but my thoughts:

The rule Anthony cited is a little dated and does not make allowances for both this situation and the ability of fire pumps to regulate their discharge pressures with the increasing use and availability of variable speed/frequency fire pumps (more recently addressed in the 14'-2019 Edition).

This arrangement, while not unique, should not generally be utilized*. The reasoning of not allowing the FDC on the suction side of the pump is to avoid over pressurization of the components on the discharge side of the fire pump (above 175PSI).

*However, in this case, the static pressure shown plus the rated pressure of the fire pump already exceeds 175 PSI, i.e. is already in excess of the lower, more standard rated components. The use of a High Pressure FDC also (likely) indicates that the signage will (likely) show a required pressure above 175 PSI.

It does show the use of Pressure Reducing Valves for both the sprinkler and hose valves on the discharge side of the pump so the issue of over pressurization is addressed (would need to verify final design pressure with all components affected).

To fix this, either provide a dedicate second water supply into the building to be used for the lower zones or flip the fire pump & P1/P2 systems to the discharge side of the pump (addressing the >175PSI issue). Hopefully, there can be additional guidance available within NFPA 14 in the future (I have not read through the PC's and minutes from the committee if it's already in the works).

Reply
Casey Milhorn
5/6/2024 09:15:57 am

Anthony has the code reference and no it is not allowed. JI has the proper solution if you want to keep low pressure zone, or Anthony if you want to have just one pressure zone. You can also use a master PRV to reduce pressure for wet and dry risers, if you are using it for standpipes you will need to provide (2) master PRVs in series w/ bypass. Depending on the applicable code and standard, (2) FDC's for each zone may be required as well. That would make the two pressure zones even more expensive vs the one. Also make sure to check the pumping ability of the responding FD. Sometimes redundant pumps are required if above the ability of the FDC to get 100 psi @ 500 gpm.

Reply
Jack G
5/6/2024 11:06:19 am

1. No, not legal.
3. Running the fdc thru the pump , the added pressure is added. This could exceed component rated pressure. Pump churn is 211, if fdp low zone pumper — pumps in 100 psi or more, component will see over 300 psi.
A solution would be to relocate it to pump discharge, add a prv , pipe to the 4 low zone dry systems, and or low zone standpipe.
Or could just change the heads and components to 300 psi, feed low zone from pump discharge.
***My favorite would be to add a check valve above each dry system control valve to match the window sprinkler configuration. Then I would pipe the fdc ( low zone ) supply to each system—- with a check valve for each system, so the systems are not co mingled. So adding 6 checks and reviling the low fdc supply pipe.
Now if you wanted to go a bit further, and have a 175 psi low zone, you could add 1 prv to the low zone standpipe, eliminate some prv s, and connect that riser to the low zone fdc, and or feed the garages and window sprinklers after that prv.
*** I personally prefer my favorite above.
I add signage ( like described in nfpa 14 ) which describe — what it supplies- system pressure, flow, maximum psi for the standpipe/ attached sprinklers. Metal signs for fdc s, metal for each system riser/ stand pipe. Then I ve made peel and stick standpipe hydraulic stickers, and stick them on each low zone risers/ standpipe—- as I’ve found , the signs will eventually disappear.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT