Good morning! Is there any NFPA 13 prescriptive option for this type of obstruction? These are ceiling waves with a horizontal fall chain lighting system. Thanks in advance.
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Dan Wilder
4/10/2024 07:27:18 am
If the fixtures are below the sprinklers >18", there isn't any additional requirements for sprinkler coverage, unless they are over 48" wide and solid top, but an "open" top gets more inventive. If they are attached to or start within that 18" zone, best bet is to place sprinklers on either side and treat the light as a vertical obstruction. This can be very instance specific so reviewing each design for impact is needed.
Reply
Anthony
4/10/2024 07:36:16 am
Most likely to be open above so you can treat it as a non obstruction as Dan says above.
Reply
Pete H
4/10/2024 08:02:32 am
Second pic looks to be a corridor so I'd call a suspended obstruction in light hazard and use NFPA 13 (2016) Figure 8.6.5.2.2. You look well below 18" under where I'd expect the deflectors to be so this should get you out of the need to protect around that.
Reply
Franck
4/10/2024 08:40:25 am
As indicated above, may be problematic only under some circumstances when the lateral side do present an. obstruction because located too close to ceiling sprinklers
Reply
Jesse
4/10/2024 12:07:14 pm
Is this fixture open at the top?
Reply
Glenn Berger
4/10/2024 06:32:06 pm
I just one of these scenarios in a Las Vegas showroom. The spacing of the verticals did not really look that close. In this case I would consider it a non-obstruction.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop September '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
October 2024
PE PREP SERIES |