MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Is Traction-Elevator Shaft Considered "Enclosed"?

12/15/2022

15 Comments

 
We have three traction elevators side by side, and the three elevators are run in a shaft with no dividing walls between the elevators.

The construction is poured-concrete with a concrete ceiling.

Is this shaft considered to be "enclosed" for the purpose of omitting sprinklers from the bottom of the shaft?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe

​
15 Comments
Glenn Berger
12/15/2022 08:09:48 am

I would say that sprinkler(s) are required at the bottom of the shaft, There is space between the elevators cabs, which can allow cumulation of stuff in the elevator pit.

Reply
James Phifer
12/15/2022 08:14:19 am

My opinion, the sprinkler would not be required. The standard allows the omission of sprinklers within the hoistway. There is no limit as to the number of elevators allowed within the hoistway.

Reply
Alex
12/15/2022 10:26:03 am

Hi James,

I'm located out in Boston, who uses an amended version of the 2015 IBC.

3002.2 states that "not more than four elevator cars shall be located in any single hoistway enclosure"

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Alex
12/15/2022 10:27:09 am

Sorry, I hit reply too fast. That is just an FYI regarding your statement that there is no limit to number of cars.

Thanks

James Phifer
12/15/2022 12:50:18 pm

Good to know Alex. Appreciate the information.
Thanks

Todd E Wyatt
12/15/2022 08:23:46 am

No, a hoistway is not considered an "enclosed space" since NFPA 13 includes prescriptive requirements specifically for "hoistways."

2022 NFPA 13 9.3.6 Elevator Machine Rooms, Machinery Spaces, Control Rooms, Control Spaces, and Hoistways includes the requirements for an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) in “hoistways.”

Chapter 9 — Sprinkler Location Requirements
9.2 Allowable Sprinkler Omission Locations.
9.2.14 Elevator Hoistways and Machine Rooms.
Sprinklers shall NOT be required in locations complying with 9.3.6.3, 9.3.6.6, or 9.3.6.7.2.

9.2.14 states that IF the hoistway meets “9.3.6.3, 9.3.6.6, OR 9.3.6.7.2”, an ASPS is NOT required in the hoistway.

First, review 9.3.6.3 :
Automatic fire sprinklers shall not be required in elevator machine rooms, machinery spaces, control rooms, control spaces, or hoistways of traction elevators installed in accordance with the applicable provisions in NFPA 101, or the applicable building code, where all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The … hoistway of traction elevator is dedicated to elevator equipment only.
(2) The … hoistway of traction elevators are protected by smoke detectors, or other automatic fire detection, installed in accordance with NFPA 72 or other approved fire alarm code.
(3) The … hoistway of traction elevators is separated from the remainder of the building by walls and floor/ceiling or roof/ceiling assemblies having a fire resistance rating of not less than that specified by the applicable building code.
(4) No materials unrelated to elevator equipment are permitted to be stored in … hoistways of traction elevators.
(5) The elevator machinery is not of the hydraulic type.

IF the hoistway does NOT meet 9.3.6.3, next check 9.3.6.6 :
The sprinklers required at the top of the elevator hoistway by 9.3.6.5 shall not be required where the hoistway for passenger elevators is noncombustible or limited-combustible and the car enclosure materials meet the requirements of ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.

IF the hoistway does NOT meet 9.3.6.6, the last “exception” is 9.3.6.7.2 :
The sprinklers in the elevator hoistway shall not be required when the suspension means provide not less than an FT-1 rating when tested to the vertical burn test requirements of UL 2556, Wire and Cable Test Methods, where the suspension means shall not continue to burn for more than 60 seconds, nor shall the indicator flag be burned more than 25 percent.

IF the hoistway does NOT meet “9.3.6.3, 9.3.6.6, OR 9.3.6.7.2”, an ASPS is required in the hoistway.

9.3.6 Elevator Machine Rooms, Machinery Spaces, Control Rooms, Control Spaces, and Hoistways.
9.3.6.1*
Sidewall spray sprinklers shall be installed at the bottom of each elevator hoistway not more than 2 ft (600 mm) above the floor of the pit.
A.9.3.6.1
The sprinklers in the pit are intended to protect against fires caused by debris, which can accumulate over time. Ideally, the sprinklers should be located near the side of the pit below the elevator doors, where most debris accumulates. However, care should be taken that the sprinkler location does not interfere with the elevator toe guard, which extends below the face of the door opening.

Reply
OP
12/15/2022 09:33:47 am

This question is in relation to the following reference:

9.3.6.2 The sprinkler required at the bottom of the elevator hoistway by 9.3.6.1 shall not be required for enclosed, noncombustible elevator shafts that do not contain combustible
hydraulic fluids.

Is the shaft still considered to meet the "enclosed" requirement if it contains more than one elevator?

I'm leaning toward "Yes."

This is for an existing building built in the early 70s, and I noted that during our on-site review of the shafts, that these pits specifically were very clean.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/15/2022 10:15:39 am

AHJs are required to enforce and interpret the adopted Codes and referenced standards.

AHJs are not permitted to NOT enforce portions of the Code and referenced standards they may disagree with.

If a jurisdiction disagrees with a Code and/or referenced standards, they are permitted to amend the adopted Code and/or referenced standards as directed per their municipal or state statute.

ASPS may initially protect occupants but their primary goal is to protect the building and subsequent emergency responders.

The answer provided was based on the assumption this was NEW construction. If these hoistways (e.g "shafts" with elevators in them) are an existing condition, the adopted International Existing Building Code (IEBC) should be reviewed FIRST instead of the IBC.

Reply
OP
12/15/2022 10:26:41 am

This question is more about the definition of "enclosed" rather than whether the AHJ will enforce the statement.

If it were a new-build, would a shaft enclosing three elevators with no division between elevators still be considered an enclosed shaft?

Chad
12/15/2022 01:15:43 pm

Todd-

You paint a overly broad brush with your first two statements and they conflict with each other. NFPA 1 (which applies in the OP's state of MA), allows a fair amount a leeway for interpretation.

Interpretations are a disagreement, in some cases, deciding that a section does not apply in the AHJ's judgment, even though the AHJ next door would not agree. Interpretation is nuanced and is part of the enforcement you refer to. And if you are aggrieved, there is always an appeals process.


The point of this post is to point out that AHJ's do not live in a black and white We are not required or compelled to do as much as inferred. Although there could be an moral or ethical reasoning to just enforce all codes as written, it would end poorly for us all if we did not judge each case on its individual merits.

Todd E Wyatt
12/15/2022 03:23:42 pm

My responses about the "authority" of the AHJ were to some of the other responses that aluded to AHJs they've work with not enforcing the Code because they either disagreed with it or were making "interpretations" that created noncompliance conditions. I was an AHJ for the DOH in WY and I understand the difficulties of serving as an AHJ especially when our decisions cost Projects additional Time and Cost because the Design Team made Code assumptions that were then discovered during Construction and/or during Final Inspection.

2021 NFPA 1 Fire Code states the following regarding AHJ authority :

Chapter 1 - Administration
1.6 Enforcement.
This Code shall be administered and enforced by the AHJ designated by the governing authority.
1.7 Authority.
1.7.3 Interpretations, Rules, and Regulations.
1.7.3.1
The AHJ is authorized to render interpretations of this Code and to make and enforce rules and supplemental regulations in order to carry out the application and intent of its provisions.
1.7.3.2
Such interpretations, rules, and regulations shall be in conformance with the intent and purpose of this Code and shall be available to the public during normal business hours.
1.7.6 Reliance on Other Enforcement Officials.
1.7.6.1*
The AHJ shall be authorized to rely on plan reviews, inspections, opinions, and approvals rendered by other enforcement officials in determining compliance with this Code.
1.7.6.2
When the AHJ relies on inspections, plan reviews, opinions, and approvals rendered by other enforcement officials in determining compliance with this Code, the other enforcement officials shall be deemed to be acting as agents under their own authority and not as agents of the AHJ enforcing this Code.

A.1.7.6.1
The AHJ enforcing NFPA 1 may not have the technical expertise, required certifications, licensure, or legal authority to enforce all of the provisions and subject matter contained therein. As an example, Chapter 11 contains references to codes and standards that regulate specific building subsystems. These subsystems could be regulated by electrical, mechanical, plumbing, or other specialty enforcement officials with technical expertise or legal authority in the specific area of the subsystem. This paragraph authorizes the AHJ enforcing NFPA 1 to rely on the opinion and authority of these specialty enforcement officials in order to determine compliance.



S
12/15/2022 08:34:21 am

I personally agree with Glenn, although all of our Fire Inspectors in the surrounding area, with an exception to one city (they can't make up their minds), does not agree on this. They all say the fire would simply burn out, and having a head would just cause more headache issues.

Then there is the issue with knowing if the head was even going off without a tamper and flow switch wired in. Also, how do you test the flow switch without filling up the elevator pit.

I do also fully agree with James. If nothing is combustible there is no restriction on the size of the hoistway in the codes provided.

Reply
Bob Bambino
12/15/2022 08:41:30 am

I cant believe in 2022 that people are still arguing this? We protect people and buildings with fire sprinklers. Fully protect your elevator shafts, hoistways, whatever you want to call them. You also put sprinklers in the the machine rooms. Fires happen, especially in these areas, and quick extinguishment is the name of the game. People have to stop the nonsense of the back and forth on this.

Reply
Danial Bartle
12/15/2022 11:23:10 am

Our project has 2-2-stop traction cars in the same hoistway which is concrete and considered "2-hour" rated. When you add sprinklers to the bottom of the shaft, heat detectors are required to be included that would shunt the electric before the sprinklers activated during a fire event. The sprinklers in the shaft can be omitted if the cars and the cabling meet ASME A17.1-2016 Safety Code for Elevators, et al for combustibility. Scheduling elevator inspectors at the same time as ITM inspections can be difficult. NFPA 101 allows omitting the smoke detector in the top of the hoistway but ASME does not if the motor is in the hoistway.
IMO, it is not just whether the shaft is considered "enclosed". There are more issues to answer. By NFPA, I could omit the sprinklers but not the detector because of ASME.

Reply
NB
12/21/2022 03:24:08 pm

Couple of things to consider:

Are the elevators fire service access elevators and/or occupant evacuation elevator?

Check the elevator shop drawings to see if the suspensions are fire rated or if they are combustible.

Also, Joe made a sheet for this:

https://mcusercontent.com/5e69714f07f4a6938aeff0309/files/5be9fc63-b743-3add-4b40-dcfa8867f81c/MeyerFire_Sprinkler_Elevators_2020_.pdf?mc_cid=3275a69091&mc_eid=14f4c897d5

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​May 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    Aba
    Ada
    Asce-7
    Asme-a171
    Astm-e1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    En-12845
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire-detection-and-alarm-systems
    Fire-dynamics
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    Fm-global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    Icc500
    IFC
    Imc
    Ipc
    Irc
    Iso
    Means Of Egress
    Nbc
    Nfpa-1
    Nfpa-10
    NFPA 101
    Nfpa-101
    Nfpa-11
    Nfpa-110
    Nfpa-1142
    Nfpa-1221
    Nfpa 13
    Nfpa-13
    Nfpa-13d
    Nfpa-13r
    Nfpa 14
    Nfpa-15
    Nfpa-16
    Nfpa-17a
    Nfpa-20
    Nfpa-2001
    Nfpa-214
    Nfpa 22
    Nfpa-220
    Nfpa 24
    Nfpa-241
    Nfpa-25
    Nfpa-25
    Nfpa-291
    Nfpa-291
    Nfpa-30
    Nfpa-30b
    Nfpa-33
    Nfpa-400
    Nfpa-409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT