MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Immediate AHJ-Approval for Plan Submittal?

9/23/2019

6 Comments

 
With all our submittals we are required to have a PE review and stamp before submitting to the AHJ.

Has anyone else wondered why it takes two business weeks to get review and approval?

I appreciate the statement that they are being reviewed for quality control yet when I've found errors with approved city drawings and they have no responsibility.

Any opinions? Anyone seeing "pay the fee" and getting immediate AHJ approval?

​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
David J Branson, PE link
9/23/2019 10:28:45 am

For many of the AHJs I work with, the job is pulling long days and barely keeping up with the workload. I have not seen many that are over-staffed. My experience is that two weeks is a very common minimum review period.

Reply
K
9/23/2019 10:46:50 am

I’ve been fortunate to be involved with the plan review process for multiple jurisdictions. I would challenge the “they have no responsibility” statement. Inspectors and reviewers can go to jail for negligence just as easily as an engineer or designer can. A lot of times these review offices are integrated right in with the fire department and are the first people the operations personnel turn to. If nothing else, they have a responsibility to ensure operations (or suppression) personnel can do their job. Further, the general public and media turn to the permitting office for a lot of information if something were to go wrong.

I am very well aware that various jurisdictions review processes, estimated review completion dates, staffing levels, etc can vary widely. In general, one common denominator I have found is how short staffed these review offices are, even when fully staffed.

Also, in a lot of the larger, (and at times even smaller jurisdictions), dozens of plans come in any single day. To give you an idea, I was able to do 7-10 reviews at most, and feel comfortable allowing a permit to be issued, and that was on a good day. This doesn’t include the follow up conversations, meetings, etc that were part of the day-to-day operation in the office. As holidays, staff time off, etc come and go, the wave of “number of reviews due” changes. An obvious influx can also be seen at various times such as summer and the end of fiscal years. Further, some reviewers have other job duties which can include new construction inspections, mandated periodic inspections, public out reach, training, and fire investigation duties, to name a few other areas of responsibilities.

Regarding the “pay for immediate approval”: one of the jurisdictions I was a part of did this. Sometimes these reviews can take all day if not multiple days. Again, keep in mind this ties up a reviewer to be able to dedicate that time to your review, taking a reviewer away from the other submittals to review. I’ve seen it work well, but then again if something such as a high-rise tower is submitted, it really demands a lot of the reviewer, and if they aren’t in their tip top prime, things can easily get missed. The departments I have been a part of have been great in the team mentality, so reviewers rely on field inspectors (and even to some degree engineers and designers), and field inspectors rely on reviewers.

I hope this provides some insight. Designers, engineers, and AHJs are as much of a stake holder in a project as the owner/operator.

Reply
Johnathan H
9/23/2019 11:20:10 am

As an AHJ, that was perfectly said! Sadly, in our little town of 18,000 I do the work of the Building official AMD the Fire Marshal, So I am looking at plans all day long. Fortunately I have a contract inspector that is knowledgeable enough and experienced enough to do a great job in the field! Where he doesn't know, he is not afraid to ask, plus about half of the submitting contractors around here are extremely good and conscientious in both their plan prep, as well as their installs!
We also have a fire prevention officers group made up of the fire inspectors, fire marshals, and seemingly the better contractors who gather together to discuss the code, installation issues, and anything else that prevents the process from moving forward. It is not a perfect world, by far, but communicating with each other is a huge key!

Reply
Matthew King
9/23/2019 10:58:04 am

Where I am at 2 days would be a godsend. Currently, 2- 3 months with an expediter depending on content. Without up to 6 mo backlog. They are very short handed here. They are converting to electronic submittal process.

Reply
Scott Thomas
9/23/2019 08:51:58 pm

As an AHJ (fire), I'm glad you asked. I'm always happy to educate contractors, design professionals, the public, local and state politicians why certain tasks are not completed in the fashion that suits every individual needs. As David J Branson and K explained AHJ's are understaffed and working in a world where everyone's project trumps all others. As most Fire Officials we strive to complete our job tasks with integrity in a timely fashion. Here are a few responsibilities that most Fire Officials have:
-Construction plan review
-Plan review of active and passive fire protection systems
-Site plan review
-Annual fire inspections
-Re-inspections for annual fire inspections, which can drag out for months or even years.
-New construction and new fire protection system inspections
-Consultations
-Complaint Inspections
-Fire Investigations, which many are criminal investigations, along with fire death and injury Investigations
-Responding to emergency calls
-Public education
-Continuing education and training for EMS, fire suppression, rescue, HAZMAT, along with ICC and NFPA certifications

Those were just to name a few. I would really love to be able to crank out plan reviews in less than two weeks, but when we get plans with deficiencies it takes longer to contact the designer and contractor to advise them of our findings and then wait for revisions. Right now with construction booming one or two people reviewing 20-30 sets of plans takes time inbetween all of the other duties previously mentioned.

My question to you would be, why are you sending incomplete plans in for review? You previously mentioned that you catch errors on city approved drawing. I do find omissions that designers think we will not catch, and at times we do not catch the errors because we are not all perfect. I tell all parties that just because I missed something in plan review, it does not relieve the contractor or designer of following the code and all violations found during the inspections shall be corrected even if they were missed during plan review. I would also ask why you would not turn in the drawings two weeks ealier if you know the standard review time is two weeks, and I'm sure it's not two weeks just for your prints, normally we have 20 or so prints in queue. We normally hear that we are the hold up, but those submitting plans normally know about the project long before the AHJ does.
As for the pay for immediate review, our jurisdiction does not offer that service at this time, though our state does for those projects being reviewed by the state building and fire safety division.
I would ask the municipality that you are having issues with and ask them about their process and let them know that you have found errors that they missed. I'm sure they will have all of the errors listed for you in the future!😉
I would be open for suggestions on better ways for faster review and time management for all of my required tasks if someone was concerned over my review times!

Reply
Mike
9/23/2019 09:36:08 pm

I think the main issue is that fire sprinklers usually are contracted very late in the building process. Sometimes the building is already being built. The contractor then has to design, submit and get approval for a prefabricated project and can be the last to install. I install anyways and have never had to change piping because of errors in design.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​July '22 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT