MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Verify Flow for Underground Flush Test?

7/31/2020

9 Comments

 
Many sprinkler systems in our area (I'm a fire marshal) have aboveground pipe installed by a fire sprinkler installer and the underground installed by an underground pipe contractor. NFPA 24 requires a minimum flow rate from underground pipe in order to remove rock and debris from the underground pipe.

Many of the underground contractors simply open up the pipe and wait until there's consistent clear water and/or stop hearing the rocks ping around. There's no measurements taken for the underground flushing and when I ask for them to verify the flow rate I get blank stares.

Is there a way to tell just by static pressure in the area if opening up the pipe flange is enough flow to satisfy the underground flushing? Or is there a measurement I should be seeing to verify the flow rate? 

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​Submitted anonymously and posted for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Brian Gerdwagen FPE
7/31/2020 10:06:49 am

Just put a handheld pitot on the flow after it is clear, like you would when flow testing a hydrant.

You know the orifice and the pitot pressure will give you the flow.

Reply
FIREPE25
7/31/2020 10:08:00 am

We generally use hosemonsters that we make ourselves with friction clamps welded to them to hold play pipes. Once the water is clean we then pitot the playpipes to ensure we flowed enough.

Reply
James
7/31/2020 10:34:38 am

NFPA 13 seems to indicate that flowing the maximum available may be acceptable. But using a pitot tube should be able to measure the flow.

10.10.2.1.3.1 Where the flow rates established in Table
10.10.2.1.3 are not attainable, the maximum flow rate available
TO the system shall be acceptable.

Reply
Bruce Verhei
7/31/2020 10:34:16 pm

You can calculate the flow required.

I’d be concerned that you are flowing long enough. How long is the new connection? I’d require a longer flush after last debris for 1200’ than for 75’.

I might do 5 minutes for the shorter length, 15 for the longer. That’s after last debris. Another piece of debris, clock starts again.

You might want to talk with your water department about how clear the want the water system after a flush. My water departments used a styrofoam cup to take a sample. They are super white and quite tiny pieces of scale are visible. Way whiter than a Starbucks paper cup. The water department wanted the water slowly turned off and any microscale flushed before we were done.

.......

More opinion. The way the fire service, the sprinkler industry, and the insurance industries expect flushing to be done is antediluvian. Pigging is the way of the future. Much cleaner. More assured obstruction removal. Much less of the citizen’s water poured on the ground.

Best.

Reply
Franck
8/3/2020 05:05:21 am

Just a question (maybe stupid) from Europe.

Is pigging a recognized solution by NFPA and/or FM to clear pipe systems in the US?
We still use to recommend the damn old flushing solution, but pigging seems more efficient (and environmental friendly).

Reply
Bruce Verhei
8/4/2020 02:43:09 am

I talked with survey bureau and local FM contact a little more than a decade ago. I had to teach them what pigging was in terms of water system. Back then the fire protection engineers I talked with weren’t aware just how widely the public water systems were cleaned using pigging.

Most of our fancy hydraulically calculated sprinkler systems are completely, directly, dependent on on those public water systems. We normally focus only the flow-pressure curve. We don’t consider debris in those mains. Mains that are kept debris free by pigging.

Pigging is the gold standard.

To my knowledge it is not widely accepted by the various stakeholders once the water passes the last underground ‘T’ on the way to the fire sprinkler system(s).

Best.

Franck
8/3/2020 05:16:16 am

Another possible solution to guess the flow without a pitot tube or hosemonster, is to use the water supply flow curve at the area of the flushing.
If you make a flow curbe using Q1.85 graph (this is normally a straight line), you have a direct relationship between the pressure in the mains and the flow.
This means, for example that if you have a static pressure of 65 psi and a residual pressure of 55 psi when flowing 500 gpm, for example, you can expect that if your pressure dropped to 25 psi, you probably flow around 1000 gpm, or around 1200 gpm when the pressure drops to 15 psi (this is not a linear scale, so use Q1.85 graph).
This is not as accurate as with a flow measurement, as indicated above, but gives you at least a guess.

Q1.85 graph can be found on the web at the following website:
https://www.pingfire.com/Default.aspx
or
https://glendhoward.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/flowtestplotcropped.jpg

Reply
ELSA LOPEZ
8/4/2020 04:11:07 pm

For me the flowrate measurement for a 4" or 6" pipe is not an Easy solution to be done at Site with an open pipe flowing huge quantity of water, for small risers it could be a good solution. For me the most accurate way is to measure the flow with the pumps discharge pumps Curve. Measuring pressure at pumps discharge will give you the flowrate you are using if any other system is being used at the same time.

Reply
HJ
8/6/2020 10:12:10 am

The requirement is found in NFPA 24:Table 10.10.2.1.3 (2013). The contractor should be using a pitot gauge to verify the minimum required gpm is reached during the flush test.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT