MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Hydraulically Calculate a Trash Chute?

10/13/2021

14 Comments

 
How should I properly be sizing a vertical branch line that feeds only a five-story trash chute?

Would a hydraulic calculation be a line calculation, so I would calculate as many as five sprinklers?

I typically feed sprinklers from the adjacent floor level, so I've never ran a separate calculation just for a trash chute. My gut says a 1-inch threaded line isn't enough for a trash chute, but I'm not 100% positive how a hydraulic calculation should be done here.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments
Alex
10/13/2021 07:26:10 am

Hi Anonymous,

There isn't a clear path outlined in NFPA for calculations of trash chutes. In the past, depending on the number of stories, I would either bring up 1 1/2" or 2" dry main.

In regards to calculating the system, I have never had someone ask for me to provide calculations. I suppose if I were to run a calculation, I would assume all heads within the trash chute were flowing and just calculate the dry riser.

For your situation, depending on the available water supply and distribution to the base of the trash chute, you could get away with a 1 1/2" dry riser feeding (3) heads.

Thanks!
Alex

Reply
RayJ
10/13/2021 08:17:55 am

Are you not able to run a 1" line to the trash chute off the lines on each floor? I think that would be more cost effective then running a new line up the entire chute.

Reply
Jessica Lutz
10/13/2021 11:59:52 am

I depends on the AHJ-preferred configuration.

Reply
Todd Wyatt
10/13/2021 08:20:15 am

2021 IBC 903.2.11.2 Rubbish and linen chutes requires sprinkler heads at the top of the chute, in the termination room, and at alternate floors (begining w/the second level below the last intake and ending with the floor above the discharge) and at the lowest intake.

Reply
Craig Hanson
10/13/2021 08:22:24 am

Trash and linen chutes are covered in NFPA 13 22.15. Usually a sprinkler every other floor is needed. There is no specific requirement to calc the chute as the sprinkler head is usually fed of each floors system. I don't think I have ever seen an independent system just for a trash chute.

Reply
Glenn Berger
10/13/2021 08:22:35 am

I have never been required to submit a separate calculation for the trash chute.

Typically it is one sprinkler per every other floor fed from a branch on that floor.

The shaft is typically fire rated, such that It will not be anywhere close to the most demanding area of a building.

Reply
Steven
10/13/2021 08:34:13 am

I have sized a trash chute riser in a 42-story high rise to be 2" pipe (although this building had fire pumps & PRVs). We used a hydraulic calculation as outlined in NFPA 13 (2016): 11.2.3.4.1, which requires only three sprinklers to be calculated (at a minimum of 15 GPM).

I think in your 5-story building, you would only have three sprinklers in your chute anyways, as Alex & Todd described. I don't know if 1" pipe will work in your situation, but I certainly think 1¼" should be sufficient. We have been having success using a grooved riser with welded 1" POLs, and incorporating flexible hose connections to tie-in to the sprinkler heads in the chute. I would propose trying something similar if your local AHJ does not have any issues with flex hoses.

Reply
Jesse
10/13/2021 08:57:16 am

I don't think I have ever calc'd a chute. Chapter 22 in NFPA deals with trash / linen chutes along the auspices of sprinkler placement and such, but typically those sprinklers are fed from floor level systems. I think I'd want to avoid a separate system if I could.

Reply
Jack G link
10/13/2021 09:42:05 am

Yes, calc 3 heads.
One head at top.
One in bottom, trash room.
Alternate floors.
Usually the sprinklers come installed in the chute, below the door, within a pocket,with a 45 degree shield over them. You may not be able to see them,
From the floor , inside the door.
I ve designed/ installed them both ways-- separate riser with flow switch/ test and drain, and from the floor.
I like the riser better, for zoning, and protecting just a chute fire.
I ve also installed from the floor, with a flow switch for the chute heads. You get a " double hit" , say if 5 chute head goes, if wired this way you get an alarm for chute, and floor. Although if chute head triggers, all the heads above usually triggers. Thats why i think riser is more appropriate. For the cost of the individual chute heads, it pays for tge 1.5 ir 1.25 inch riser.
I used " picker trunk, gem/ grinnell heads , which are still available but expensive. " Smooth frame, glass bulb, for wiping clean ". .
I like the flex head idea. I would use the " duct version " if providing.
Usually the chute is installed in a fire rated enclosure
Usuall, block, sometimes rated shaft wall, both types enclosures, make it hard to get to, and pipe, the below door, chute cute sprinklers.
Install at least arm or flex, with sleeve, to sprinklers, before the chute is walled in, is appropriate.
Test and drain. Flow switch in trash room below. Sometimes need a dry head in top of shaft.

Reply
David anderson link
10/13/2021 01:28:22 pm

I have been placing heads in trash chutes sincince I can nopt remember when. Although NFPA 13 only requires every other floor , Trash chutes are generally manufactured now with a factory installed sprinkler head at the door to the chute. Genrally I have placed an 1 1/4" control assembly and risert to feed this type of assembly at every floor. I have never been asked to calculate it. Lets face it most heads are high rises with 100 plus psi avalable at the highest floor. A single head would discharge 56 gpm. So reasoning rules. Whatever you do don't let this out as it will start a reaction and then the "what if" reviewers will take over. I can remeber years a go (early 1990's) when a Fire Marshall was inspecting a job I was doing and a duct passes through the corener of a closet that was 6 ' by 2'. The bulkheads lowered the cieling in the oine end of the closets by 12" and was about 18" wide. Rather than argue with him I said I'll tell you what, I'll give you a torch and stand you in the corner under the bulkhead and I'll set the head off. Let me know if you get wet.." That was it he pulled off the idea of requitring a second head. Why because common sense prevailed. There are those however where therre is no common sense. So leave dead dogs lie. Technicall y as pointed out it is 3 heads, but then you cna go everyother floor. Pick your poision.

Reply
Craig Hanson
10/13/2021 01:32:12 pm

I agree David, I will also add that you are costing your customer to do things that are not necessary or needed. running a separate line just for the heads in the chute on a 5 story building is a waste of money and time for your fitters that are probably going to cuss you out for running it.

Reply
David J Anderson link
10/14/2021 12:27:18 pm

Yes but here AHJ's generally require a control valve and flow swtich at every floor. So cost are not necessarialy appples to aples and added cost of addtional Fire Alarm Monitor Modules general out weigh the single feed riser system.

Patrick Drumm
10/23/2021 10:00:19 am

I 100% agree that doing things above and beyond code is not a path to go down often. In this case, there is a potential "what if" situation that may be more probable than some that are often proposed. More often than not this points me to a separate line design. With a separate line and one control valve at the base of the chute water flow can be shut down in a case of accidental discharge of a sprinkler due to physical damage. I know there is protection designed into these chutes and they do there job for the most part. With feeds off each floor, if someone at the bottom of the chute encounters water, they need to close feeds at ever floor until they find the correct floor. By then there could be significant water damage.

I have encountered a few specifications that require a control valve even if the sprinkler is fed from the individual floors. Is anyone aware of a code section in NFPA #13 that requires this?

sean
10/14/2021 11:34:23 am

11.2.3.4 Special Design Areas.
11.2.3.4.1 for dedicated runs.
If it is feed off the floor I would say the hydraulics can be dictated by a similar hazard calculation on the floor and keep the same hydraulic pipe schedule.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT